[00:16] <amurray> RAOF bdmurray: I asked tjaalton on Friday about sponsoring my libseccomp SRU in LP: #1891810 but I can't see it in the queue... would either of you be willing to sponsor this to unapproved?
[04:49] <tjaalton> amurray: oh, i misunderstood then..i can sponsor it
[05:59] <amurray> tjaalton: awesome, thanks - apologies for confusing things the other day, but I think I finally understand how the queues / -proposed etc all fit together now - also I had subscribed ubuntu-sponsors to the bug, so is pinging someone in here redundant then in that case to just get it uploaded to unapproved? Or is that still a useful step in this case to make sure it gets seen?
[06:00] <tjaalton> amurray: pinging potential sponsors would help, sru team members generally have other things on their plate
[06:00] <tjaalton> the sru team is a small subset of core-dev
[06:00] <amurray> cool - I just wanted to make sure I wasn't creating extra noise - thanks again for your help with this
[06:02] <tjaalton> so if your team has (a) core-dev(s), they might be the first one(s) to ask ;)
[06:03] <amurray> ooh ok I'll bother m_deslaur next time instead then
[06:03] <amurray> :)
[06:20] <amurray> tjaalton: so just to confirm, are you happy to take a look at this one and sponsor it to unapproved for me or should I go to marc instead?
[06:21] <tjaalton> amurray: I can do it now. where was it?
[06:21] <tjaalton> oh the lp bug above
[06:21] <amurray> debdiff's are attached in the bug, and I have uploaded them to the security-proposed PPA as well at https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/ if that's easier to work with
[06:51] <tjaalton> amurray: hmm now I see that you're actually backporting 2.5.1 to every release.. why is that needed?
[06:54] <amurray> it adds support for new system calls plus some fixups for issues on various architectures as well - so without support for these new syscalls, applications that use libseccomp can't effectively sandbox themselves as they can't even specify a filter to say limit access to one of the new syscalls that get added in later kernels - this is important for things like snapd to make sure that snaps can't inadvertentl
[06:54] <amurray> call and hence bypass an intended access restriction
[06:55] <tjaalton> ok, I see that 2.4.3 was backported earlier, so it's not the first time
[06:55] <tjaalton> that a full backport is proposed
[06:56] <amurray> yep this is 'normal' for libseccomp :)
[07:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libseccomp (bionic-proposed/main) [2.4.3-1ubuntu3.18.04.3 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core)
[07:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libseccomp (xenial-proposed/main) [2.4.3-1ubuntu3.16.04.3 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (core)
[07:08] <tjaalton> amurray: uploaded
[07:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libseccomp (focal-proposed/main) [2.4.3-1ubuntu3.20.04.3 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[07:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libseccomp (groovy-proposed/main) [2.4.3-1ubuntu4 => 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~20.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[07:10] <amurray> tjaalton: thank you :)
[09:47] <jibel> sil2100, Laney could one of you review bug 1918613
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-bronn-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:02] <sil2100> jibel: on it!
[10:02] <sil2100> Laney: ...in the meantime, could you review the netplan FFe for Lukas? Since I guess it's in 'bad taste' to review and approve FFe's of a project I'm heavily involved in:
[10:02] <sil2100> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1919453
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-bronn-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-bronn-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[10:07] <jibel> sil2100, thanks!
[10:21] <sil2100> Done o/
[10:34] <tintou> Hi there! Can someone look at bug 1915529 (bileto: https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/4442 )
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-bronn-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in bionic
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-bronn-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-bronn-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in xenial
[11:01] <rbasak> Laney: ^ first script action seen
[11:01] <rbasak> (I think?)
[11:07] <Laney> yup
[11:07] <Laney> rbasak: and the mail worked too, woohoo
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.167~18.04.0 => 1.167~18.04.1] (core)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.167~16.04.0 => 1.167~16.04.1] (core)
[11:29] <xnox> vorlon: no change backports ftbfs because they want too new debhelper =( uploaded using compat 9 in hirsute, and just doing .1 bumps for bionic & xenial ^^^^
[11:29] <xnox> next time we do SRUs it should be better.....
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-science [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.14.1ubuntu1]
[13:05] <doko> ogra: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hirsute/+queue?queue_state=0  are all these syncs wanted for hirsute? because the ppa doesn't have any hirsute packages ...
[13:05] <ogra> doko, yeah, it is all for hirsute
[13:06] <ogra> (well, eventually for focal SRUs )
[13:06] <doko> I'm not going to review these, no time
[13:07] <ogra> doko, no, it is all planned and agreed with sil2100 already, there wer multiple meetings around these syncs
[13:07] <ogra> *were
[13:07] <doko> so source reviews were already done?
[13:08] <ogra> i dont think so
[13:19] <doko> Laney: where can I find better information, why bazel-bootstrap/riscv64 doesn't migrate?
[13:52] <sil2100> ogra: well, to be fair it was never mentioned that those builds were done for focal
[13:53] <sil2100> ogra: I didn't look at the packages themselves, but since we targeted hirsute I assumed those were built against hirsute - how can we know if the packages build correctly in hirsute then?
[13:53] <ogra> sil2100, i thought you had taken a look at the PPA ...
[13:53] <ogra> abeato, ^^^ could you do re-builds for hirsute
[13:54] <ogra> and ping me after ... then i can re-import
[13:54] <sil2100> No, I wasn't involved in the sponsoring parts
[13:54] <sil2100> Guess I shouldn't have assumed stuff
[13:54] <sil2100> oh well
[13:54]  * ogra notes that he's not actually here ... 
[13:55] <abeato> ogra, ack, will do
[13:55] <ogra> thx
[13:56] <xnox> ogra:  also source archive is private, so non-AAs can't see what you are trying to copy in =)
[13:56] <xnox> direct uploads would be nice, or like make the source that things are copied from public. Or like copy to a public PPA first, then into the archive. Although maybe even then things will still be hidden.
[13:56] <ogra> xnox, which is fine i guess ? since the reviewer will be AA ?
[13:59] <abeato> sil2100, is it possible to copy binaries to hirsute directly? or a rebuild is needed?
[14:00] <cjwatson> Most things become public once they've been copied to some kind of public archive, but this case will still be problematic because the team that owns the PPA is private.
[14:01] <cjwatson> Such copies (from PPAs owned by private teams) have historically caused problems because the original build location is invisible even after they're copied into the primary archive.
[14:02] <ogra> which is why only source packages got copied ...
[14:02] <cjwatson> I think most of those issues are fixed now, but it's only even been possible to avoid some of the problems within the last year or so, so there may be further problems.
[14:02] <cjwatson> Ah, only copying sources will probably help, yes.
[14:02] <cjwatson> The publication history will still look a bit odd for people who can't see that team.
[14:13] <xnox> abeato: we do allow binary copies from bileto.ubuntu.com => public one. But there are many requirements on the built binaries. I.e. built devirt, with pkgbinarymanger, with debug symbols, such that the end copy look correct "just like it was built in the archive"
[14:13] <xnox> but the source PPA had to be setup correctly before the builds were done.
[14:14] <xnox> built with -security/-proposed enabled, as appropriate
[14:14] <abeato> xnox, hm, I see, looks like it will be easier if I upload a new version for hirsute
[14:18] <xnox> abeato:  yeah....
[14:23] <Laney> doko: nowhere special, use chdist or something to see why it's not installable I guess
[14:23] <Laney> (from update_output)
[14:27] <kanashiro_> sil2100: bdmurray do you have any comments about the backport of the container stack I am doing? LP #1919322
[14:27] <kanashiro_> I am working on runc regressions and it'd be great to know if any issue will arise with containerd and docker.io
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1068.76~16.04.1] (kernel)
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1096.109~16.04.1] (kernel)
[15:37] <sil2100> Laney: hey hey! Did you have a moment to take a look at ze netplanz FFe?
[15:39] <juliank> ubuntu-archive please remove some rust cruft: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-num-rational/+bug/1920947
[15:48] <falcojr> bdmurray: cloud-init SRU uploads have been queued for X, B, F, and G. Can you review so we can get them into proposed?
[15:51] <juliank> more removals: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-proc-quote/+bug/1920957
[15:51] <juliank> next trying to figure out if we can remove rust-diesel
[15:51] <juliank> $ reverse-depends -b src:rust-diesel
[15:51] <juliank> b'<p>Package not published in specified release</p>'
[15:51] <juliank> reverse-depends me no likes
[15:51] <sil2100> bdmurray: once you're around, since Laney is busy busy, could maybe you take a look at the netplan FFe? Link to it is here:
[15:52] <sil2100> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1919453
[15:52] <sil2100> (since I don't want to self-ACK a project I'm active in)
[15:52] <juliank> Ooh, rust-derive-more can go too
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1096.109~16.04.1]
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1068.76~16.04.1]
[15:53] <juliank> removal: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-derive-more/+bug/1920959
[15:54] <sil2100> bdmurray: in the meantime, even though it's not my SRU day, I'll take a look at your SRU uploads o/
[15:55] <bdmurray> falcojr: noted
[15:55] <bdmurray> sil2100: thanks!
[15:58] <sil2100> bdmurray, vorlon, Laney: another uh, small FFe for ubuntu-image - late and a really small release, but it's for the DTB UC20 stuff:
[15:58] <sil2100> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-image/+bug/1920955
[15:59] <sil2100> It actually only really matters for focal, but I want to keep the chain of releases proper
[16:09] <doko> bah, removed perl 5.32.1-3 from hirsute-proposed. not built on amd64, and b0rking -proposed
[16:17] <Laney> sil2100: sorry, I'll look soon
[16:17] <Laney> in 20 minutes or so
[16:18] <bdmurray> falcojr: bug 19118303 referenced in the changelog seems to be private so the SRU of cloud-init cannot be accepted. Additionally, bug 1908548 is missing SRU information although the test case seems obvious.
[16:25] <falcojr> bdmurray: Thanks. Can you clarify what you mean by "bug 1908548 is missing SRU information" ?
[16:28] <bdmurray> falcojr: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template
[16:39] <bdmurray> kanashiro_: Looking at docker.io for Groovy there seem to be some packaging changes that aren't documented in the changelog e.g. OOMScoreAdjust=-500. Could you double check the diff and update the SRU bug?
[16:43] <kanashiro_> bdmurray: ok, I will double check that. Would a new comment in the bug be enough? Like I did for containerd
[16:46] <Laney> sil2100: done
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted corosync [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.0.3-2ubuntu3.1]
[16:47] <bdmurray> kanashiro_: I think an "Other Info" section in the bug description would be best.
[16:48] <kanashiro_> bdmurray: ack
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted corosync [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.3-2ubuntu2.1]
[16:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted corosync [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.3-0ubuntu1.2]
[16:56] <sil2100> Laney: <3
[16:56] <sil2100> Laney: thank you!
[17:11] <falcojr> bdmurray: re: SRU of cloud-init...1918303 is now public and I have added the SRU template to 1908548
[17:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted exo [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.12.11-1ubuntu1.20.10.1]
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted exo [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.11-1ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[17:17] <bdmurray> falcojr: great, thanks!
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: at (focal-proposed/main) [3.1.23-1ubuntu1 => 3.1.23-1ubuntu1.1] (core)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: at (groovy-proposed/main) [3.1.23-1ubuntu2 => 3.1.23-1ubuntu2.1] (core)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.14.0-1ubuntu1.2]
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (groovy-proposed/main) [2.14.0-1ubuntu1.1 => 2.14.0-1ubuntu1.2] (core)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.3]
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: lg-gpio (hirsute-proposed/primary) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected lg-gpio [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lg-gpio [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected bootgen-xlnx [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [2020.2]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libegl-mali-xlnx [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [9p0.01rel0-0ubuntu3]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected u-boot-xlnx [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [2020.2-0ubuntu3]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected vitis-ai [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [1.3-1ubuntu2]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected xilinx-vcu-ctrl [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [2020.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected xlnx-firmware [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1ubuntu13]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected fpga-manager-xlnx [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [2020.2ubuntu1]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected vitis-ai-dnndk [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [1.3]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected xilinx-vcu-omx [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [2020.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected linux-firmware-xilinx-vcu [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [2020.2-0ubuntu0xlnx1]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected xrt [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [202020.2.8.726-0ubuntu2]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-rtslib-fb [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.73-1ubuntu4.1]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3.2 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3.3] (core)
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lg-gpio [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lg-gpio [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lg-gpio [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lg-gpio [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lg-gpio [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lg-gpio [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lg-gpio [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lg-gpio [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lg-gpio [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lg-gpio [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lg-gpio [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:21] <kanashiro_> bdmurray: I just added the "Other Info"  section as you requested
[19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (groovy-proposed/main) [1:15.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:15.0.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack)
[19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (groovy-proposed) [19.12-0ubuntu5.1]
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (focal-proposed) [19.12-0ubuntu4.2]
[20:11] <xnox> is perl broken?
[20:11] <xnox> Can't locate IO/Compress/Gzip.pm in @INC
[20:11] <xnox> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/529442668/buildlog_ubuntu-hirsute-armhf.rustc_1.50.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz
[20:13] <xnox> The following packages will be REMOVED:
[20:13] <xnox>   build-essential* dpkg-dev* libdpkg-perl* perl*
[20:13] <xnox> lol
[20:26] <doko> xnox: was out of sync across archs. should be fine now
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lg-gpio [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1.6.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:57] <xnox> doko:  ack.
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (groovy-proposed/main) [4.0-1ubuntu2.2 => 4.1-1ubuntu0.20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[21:29] <mwhudson> ah i saw that failure too, was confusing
[22:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (groovy-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.10.1]
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[23:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (groovy-proposed) [20.10.2-0ubuntu1~20.10.1]
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceilometer [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:15.0.0-0ubuntu3]
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceilometer [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:15.0.0-0ubuntu3]