[00:13] Gdoc: Edits and polishing done - guiverc see if you agree with the arrangement of "Ubuntu 21.04 Testing Week" to The Hub section ( rather than moving to "General" - considering the summaries ). [00:14] I'll look this arvo rather than now.. [00:15] guiverc: Plenty of time my friend :D [00:15] * guiverc hasn't ruled out making some noise & holes in paper :) [00:16] guiverc: I still have my hair - on spite of all the pulling to get Gdoc where it is :P [00:17] :) [00:44] Bashing-om, the summary doesn't match discourse listed link (Summary is popey's own writing/blog) and not the discourse. [00:45] guiverc: Ouch ! Teach me to rush - - thought they were the same :( Lemme re-think the sloppyation :P [00:46] I much preferred the blog one, it was all Alan, rather than modified from suggested sent to Alan via gdoc [00:46] I'm having issues with gdoc comments; it's started showing comments from jan-2017 [00:47] Ya advise that we go with the discourse summary - or revert back to the Planet's ? [00:47] I'd like to include Popey's blog in issue personally (with summary). I prefer the discourse link (not the content; the link I feel is more official) [00:49] guiverc: Hokay - I can do that fairly easily. Just provide the discourse link under Alan's bog summary in the Planet section. [01:10] guiverc: "Ubuntu 21.04 Testing Week" reformatted onto the Planet section. This workie like so ? [01:11] I very much like, well done Bashing-om [01:12] I'll look thru rest later though [01:12] guiverc: :) [02:09] Bashing-om, I've looked thru gdoc; two comments made.. one a suggested drop (a few words) & a confused-question over [] that felt like a note-to-self [02:15] guiverc: the [] is editorial for verbage not from the author - I did feel the supplementary info a good thing to provide our readers - is there a better way ? also adding CVE-2021-3449 article to Gdoc. a work now in progress. [02:19] I don't know... I agree it makes it more understandable/useful to readers, but I have no idea how to add it; that maybe the best way [02:19] Bashing-om, ^ [02:26] guiverc: So much that I do not know about editorial concepts :( [02:46] guiverc: Added the CVE advisory in the "in the Press" section - appropriate there, or find a way to move it up to "Other Community News"? How does it read to you ? [02:56] looks great to me [02:57] guiverc: Outstanding - Tired now and my thinking is forced :( [02:58] You've done well Bashing-om , thank you once again [02:58] guiverc: We are all in this together :D [21:26] UWN: Issue 676 up for review and final edits: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue676 :D [21:31] Huh, and here I figured we skipped the 21.04 UI Freeze last week because of little importance.. [21:34] And why are all flavors under the Testing Week summary spelled in lower case? [21:37] krytarik: lower case. do not know - let me see what I can learn. [21:37] "don't currently execute fsck on boot and that is currently being re-visited" - and I feel like the second instance of "currently" here could as well be a "now" [21:38] krytarik: Will make it so :P [22:23] krytarik: Above my knowledge set to find where the formatiing error is that produces that lighter text below "Ubuntu 21.04 Testing Week" section. Any ideas ? [22:28] I don't see any issue there though.. :3 [22:28] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Stephen Michael Kellat: Pondering the News Biz @ http://coyote.works//pondering-the-news-biz.html [22:28] krytarik: Must be the lighting (daylight) on my monitor :( [22:30] Well, if it is then it'd go away on scrolling, does it? :P [22:34] krytarik: Nope - still looking and all text below appears lighter than that above "Ubuntu 21.04 Testing Week" to me :( [22:35] Post a screenshot? [22:38] krytarik: https://imgur.com/OpbQSU0.png . Slight but I do notice . [22:40] Yeah, the screenshot proves that it must be on your monitor.. [22:40] Because I can't see any difference there either. [22:40] Good deal : Thanks for the looking :D [22:40] Of course! [22:45] But even on the screen shot - when I zoom in the difference is apparent :( More pronounced color saturation above and somewhat heavier lettering :( [22:47] Because you are then replicating the issue just using another medium than the live website view. [22:59] krytarik: O'Kay - Just seems strange that I only see that difference in rendering on UWN's page - not on irssi or the forum page :( [23:07] Bashing-om: Try any other wiki page? In the past, when I still had a monitor that was.. slightly old-school (CRT) and at the verge of going out, I've noticed that the page background there causes extra stress on the monitor.. [23:12] krytarik: Will do a different WIKI page - good thought - Yhis is a recent change of monitors. [23:17] krytarik: You are so right ! I do also see the deliniation of texts on some other WIKIs -:D [23:20] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Colin King: A Common C Integer Multiplication Mistake @ http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ASmackerelOfOpinion/~3/YQcaPmaVi1Y/a-common-c-integer-multiplication.html (by noreply@blogger.com (Colin Ian King)) [23:26] Bashing-om: https://imgur.com/iTzpV2d.png - does this fix the issue for you? [23:30] krytarik: Nope - even there I see a distinct difference in how heavy the text and black/red colors appear on my monitor :( Will be on my mind to know the why for a spell :D [23:37] Bashing-om: https://imgur.com/C44HpwK.png - how about now? :P [23:45] krytarik: All text following the "KDE Gear 21.04 Apps: Send us Your Features" section appears lighter to me. I had originally thought "markdown" - but as I can see the disparity on some other WIKI pages - nope, markdown does not seem now to be at fault. [23:50] Curious and curioser.. :3 [23:55] krytarik: I too thought might be my failing eye-sight. Had my wife looky and she confirms the difference. :( [23:55] (on this monitor) [23:56] Hummm that is a thought too ... see what the page displays like on her graphic's station !