[09:48] <seb128> is anyone working on the flatpak tests which are currently failing in hirsute with glib 2.68?
[11:19] <doko> seb128: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flatpak/blob/rawhide/f/flatpak.spec shows that Fedora disabled lto for flatpack, however the current package in hirsute isn't built with lto.  and I don't see that the flatpack ci tests are rebuilding flatpack. I'll add that to the lto-disabled-list for the next upload.
[11:30] <seb128> doko, thanks
[14:34] <seb128> bdmurray, hey, so since the sponsoring queue changes are merged could you git pull on the server?
[14:44] <bdmurray> seb128: I'll do that today or tomorrow
[14:50] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: Is there any chance you could create debdiffs for bug 1915923?
[14:58] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks
[15:54] <leftyfb> Does backportpackage have a limitation where you can't backport packages from the universe repo?
[16:04] <cjwatson> leftyfb: no
[16:05] <cjwatson> universe is just a different component of the Ubuntu archive, not a separate archive
[16:06] <leftyfb> cjwatson: what am I doing wrong then? https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/zGfp8P9TVp/
[16:09] <cjwatson> leftyfb: You're giving it a binary package name.  "apt showsrc liborocos-kdl1.4" says the source package name is orocos-kdl
[16:10] <leftyfb> oh, I didn't know we had to use the source names
[16:29] <bdmurray> xnox: I'm trying to follow the instructions here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RISC-V and ran into this. https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/kwKjGCnhC7/
[17:39] <xnox> bdmurray: which combination of host release, guest image, and like u-boot qemu package version numbers? Does focal one work for you?
[17:54] <bdmurray> xnox: focal works for me - I'm just using whatever the wiki page says
[17:55] <bdmurray> xnox: the host release is groovy
[17:55] <xnox> bdmurray: I wonder if qemu doesn't have riscv cpu errata
[18:22] <xnox> bdmurray:  reproduced too, even with my fixed up kernel for l2 cache issue.
[18:22] <xnox> cpaelzer:  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/FyJpTv9MpK/
[18:23] <xnox> cpaelzer:  is there something in older qemu's missing for newer riscv kernels? i.e. support for CONFIG_RISCV_ERRATA_ALTERNATIVE ?
[18:24] <xnox> hm, also easter
[18:41] <xnox> i wonder if there is qemu 6 anywhere for me to try.
[20:21] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I'll see what I can do.
[21:41] <bdmurray> I haven't done something like this before but does disabling the apparmor profile to get the autopkgtest for privoxy to pass seem sane? https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/H8J4FqdDWH/ The test uses a tempdir for the pid and config file which the profile isn't allowing.
[21:44] <bdmurray> This is likely a temporary fix as privoxy supports arguments for both the pid and config file and that won't work with the profile.
[23:36] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: re: bug 1915923: debdiff attached to bug.