[02:26] PR snapd#10115 closed: tests: force a proxy to use cache action <⛔ Blocked> [05:54] morning [07:02] morning [07:06] pstolowski: heya [07:13] o/ [07:21] good morning pstolowski and mborzecki [07:42] o/ [10:15] quick errand, bbiab [10:16] PR snapcraft#3496 opened: Revert "repo: account for arch & version when filtering stage packages (#3461)" [10:38] PR snapd#10119 opened: boot: pass gadget path to command line helpers, load gadget from seed === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g [11:05] re [12:08] PR snapd#10098 closed: tests: updated restore phase of spread tests - part 1 [13:03] PR snapd#10120 opened: boot: derive boot variables for kernel command lines [13:16] popey: NOOOOOOOOOO [13:21] :( [13:23] what did the P-man do?! (not typing popey to avoid the unnecessary ping... dang it) [13:25] popey, disappoved ! [13:25] diddledan, -> twitter [13:25] diddledan: https://twitter.com/popey/status/1380139900108963848?s=21 [13:25] 🤷 [13:25] * zyga hugs popey and is genuinely sad [13:25] 🤗 [13:25] :-o [13:46] PR snapcraft#3496 closed: Revert "repo: account for arch & version when filtering stage packages (#3461)" [13:55] ijohnson, hey [13:55] about https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10047#pullrequestreview-618690124 [13:55] PR #10047: tests: remove the snap profiler from the test suite [13:55] so the idea is to have a place with the snaps we use but are not used with install_local right? [13:56] so as part of that PR I could move the profiler snap and the create another pr to mvoe more snapd, is that ok? [14:08] PR snapd#10121 opened: boot, cmd/snap: include extra cmdline args in debug boot-vars output [14:11] ijohnson, so, I need to see how the namimg should be [14:11] PR snapcraft#3497 opened: repo: fix regression in fix_symlink() [14:11] something list tests/lib/snpas/store and tests/lib/snaps/packable [14:12] ijohnson, does it make sense to reorg like that [14:12] so then install-local will just check for snaps in tests/lib/snaps/packable [14:18] hey cachio sorry was in a meeting [14:18] ijohnson, np [14:38] cachio: that proposal should be fine to set it up like tests/lib/snaps/store and tests/lib/snaps/packable [14:38] ijohnson, tests/lib/snaps/build and tests/lib/snaps/pack? [14:38] ijohnson, tests/lib/snaps/store and tests/lib/snaps/pack? [14:39] what do you prefer [14:39] ? [14:39] hmm not sure which is the better name [14:39] let's go with store for now, perhaps others can share their opinion in the pr [14:39] sure [14:46] thanks cachio [14:46] ijohnson, yaw [15:17] PR snapcraft#3498 opened: storeapi: set content-type and accept headers for close [16:03] * cachio lunch [16:34] PR snapd#10083 closed: systemd: enrich UnitStatus returned by systemd.Status() with Installed flag [16:37] PR snapcraft#3498 closed: storeapi: set content-type and accept headers for close [16:49] PR snapd#10122 opened: daemon: refine access testing [17:04] PR snapd#10123 opened: boot,gadget,devicestate: create "aux-key" for fde-hooks v2 [17:08] mvo mini review [17:15] zyga: \o/ [17:15] mvo always a pleasure [17:15] mvo our release is out, in a way [17:16] and some downtime is coming up [17:16] I really hope to catch more breath soon [17:52] PR snapcraft#3497 closed: repo: fix regression in fix_symlink() [18:09] PR snapd#10124 opened: tests: update layout for tests - part 1 [18:10] * cachio afk -> doc app [21:11] PR snapd#10125 opened: tests: update layout for tests - part 2