| === popey0 is now known as popey | ||
| seb128 | mwhudson, hey, thanks for fixing the ubuntu-drivers-common build but it's failing autopkgtests now | 06:40 |
|---|---|---|
| seb128 | FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' | 06:40 |
| seb128 | is it new that syncpackage let .dsc files around in the dir it was called from? | 06:51 |
| === TJ- is now known as Guest88768 | ||
| TJ_Remix | anyone available to update systemd's mkosi which is fatally broken for Ubuntu? Bug #1923145 | 08:12 |
| ubottu | bug 1923145 in mkosi (Ubuntu) "Actually support Ubuntu" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1923145 | 08:12 |
| === TJ_Remix is now known as TJ- | ||
| === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks | ||
| vorlon | xnox, sarnold: nftables has been seeded in standard for hirsute but LP: #1887187 is still open. Are we migrating to nftables or not? | 15:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1887187 in nftables (Ubuntu) "[MIR] nftables" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1887187 | 15:12 |
| juliank | vorlon: it's certainly enabled as default iptables backend; and lxd bridge is broken by that if you enable ufw (need to add extra ufw rules to allow routing traffic to bridge; annoying) | 15:51 |
| juliank | So I guess we should have the native CLI tools for it, too | 15:51 |
| hallyn | hey all. stgraber suggested i might take the hirsute lxc package and push to focal, but i'm a bit rusty on these details - if the hirsute version is 1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1 , do i just prepend a new hcangelog entry like '1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1.20.04.1' ? | 16:08 |
| stgraber | hallyn: 1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 | 16:08 |
| stgraber | at least that's the format we used for previous lxc SRUs | 16:09 |
| hallyn | oh i tried to look for an example but i guess not hard enough | 16:09 |
| hallyn | thanks. oh, . would make it earlier? | 16:09 |
| hallyn | (nm, i see) | 16:19 |
| juliank | doko: Is there a way to easily disable lto on dev machine? | 16:31 |
| juliank | though arguably that's also not the best idea | 16:34 |
| juliank | problem is I need to disable LTO to get decent compile speeds for apt change testing | 16:34 |
| JawnSmith | Is any core dev available to restart the armhf s3ql test that failed triggered by procps? | 16:40 |
| ginggs | JawnSmith: i guess you meant in focal? done | 16:47 |
| hallyn | stgraber: figured i'd let a ppa test-build it first, https://launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/+archive/ubuntu/lxc-backport/+files/lxc_4.0.6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1_source.changes. (taking awhile to build) | 16:52 |
| JawnSmith | ginggs: yes, sorry for the lack of detail. Thanks! | 16:52 |
| === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch | ||
| ginggs | JawnSmith: np! | 17:17 |
| hallyn | stgraber: do you think we'd want to backport to bionic as well, or is that too much since it's on 3.x? | 17:59 |
| sarnold | vorlon: sorry, the security team has still not been able to work on nftables | 18:06 |
| === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson | ||
| stgraber | hallyn: probably wouldn't bother with bionic at this point. In the past we've been pushing lxc and lxcfs through -backports as an option. If there's demand for that, we could do it easily enough but trying to SRU this fix on top of 3.0 probably isn't worth the trouble. | 18:43 |
| hallyn | ok sounds good - thx | 18:45 |
| hallyn | wait - do we no longer use ${release}-proposed as the target pocket? | 18:48 |
| rbasak | hallyn: ${release} automatically redirects for SRUs. For backports I think you still need to use ${release}-backports | 18:54 |
| rbasak | ${release}-proposed will still work, but IMHO it's ugly because the upload ends up in -updates in the end. | 18:55 |
| hallyn | rbasak: thank you. | 18:55 |
| doko | juliank: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=optimize=-lto dpkg-buildpackage ... | 19:12 |
| JawnSmith | Is any core dev available to restart this test? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=s390x&package=ranger&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1 | 19:28 |
| JawnSmith | and also http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=amd64&package=reprotest&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1 | 19:30 |
| ginggs | JawnSmith: . | 19:35 |
| JawnSmith | thanks again! | 19:37 |
| ginggs | JawnSmith: yw! but going afk now | 19:37 |
| vorlon | sarnold: so, are we going to promote it to main in advance of security review, or should it be unseeded? | 19:42 |
| sarnold | vorlon: excellent question; I'd vote for unseed based solely on what I know of the situation, but whoever seeded it may feel strongly otherwise | 19:42 |
| vorlon | xnox: ^^ | 19:43 |
| JawnSmith | for any core dev still online here is a flurry of autopkgtest restart requests. I've looked into them all and they all just seem like flakey tests. | 21:08 |
| JawnSmith | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=groovy&arch=s390x&package=ranger&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-5ubuntu2.1 | 21:08 |
| JawnSmith | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=groovy&arch=arm64&package=postorius&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-5ubuntu2.1 | 21:08 |
| JawnSmith | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=groovy&arch=ppc64el&package=nodejs&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-5ubuntu2.1 | 21:09 |
| JawnSmith | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=groovy&arch=s390x&package=reprotest&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-5ubuntu2.1 | 21:09 |
| JawnSmith | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=ppc64el&package=reprotest&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1 | 21:09 |
| JawnSmith | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=amd64&package=xpra&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1 | 21:09 |
| bdmurray | JawnSmith: I can do those for you | 21:55 |
| JawnSmith | Thanks bdmurray | 22:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!