=== popey0 is now known as popey [06:40] mwhudson, hey, thanks for fixing the ubuntu-drivers-common build but it's failing autopkgtests now [06:40] FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' [06:51] is it new that syncpackage let .dsc files around in the dir it was called from? === TJ- is now known as Guest88768 [08:12] anyone available to update systemd's mkosi which is fatally broken for Ubuntu? Bug #1923145 [08:12] bug 1923145 in mkosi (Ubuntu) "Actually support Ubuntu" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1923145 === TJ_Remix is now known as TJ- === didrocks999 is now known as didrocks [15:12] xnox, sarnold: nftables has been seeded in standard for hirsute but LP: #1887187 is still open. Are we migrating to nftables or not? [15:12] Launchpad bug 1887187 in nftables (Ubuntu) "[MIR] nftables" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1887187 [15:51] vorlon: it's certainly enabled as default iptables backend; and lxd bridge is broken by that if you enable ufw (need to add extra ufw rules to allow routing traffic to bridge; annoying) [15:51] So I guess we should have the native CLI tools for it, too [16:08] hey all. stgraber suggested i might take the hirsute lxc package and push to focal, but i'm a bit rusty on these details - if the hirsute version is 1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1 , do i just prepend a new hcangelog entry like '1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1.20.04.1' ? [16:08] hallyn: 1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 [16:09] at least that's the format we used for previous lxc SRUs [16:09] oh i tried to look for an example but i guess not hard enough [16:09] thanks. oh, . would make it earlier? [16:19] (nm, i see) [16:31] doko: Is there a way to easily disable lto on dev machine? [16:34] though arguably that's also not the best idea [16:34] problem is I need to disable LTO to get decent compile speeds for apt change testing [16:40] Is any core dev available to restart the armhf s3ql test that failed triggered by procps? [16:47] JawnSmith: i guess you meant in focal? done [16:52] stgraber: figured i'd let a ppa test-build it first, https://launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/+archive/ubuntu/lxc-backport/+files/lxc_4.0.6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1_source.changes. (taking awhile to build) [16:52] ginggs: yes, sorry for the lack of detail. Thanks! === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch [17:17] JawnSmith: np! [17:59] stgraber: do you think we'd want to backport to bionic as well, or is that too much since it's on 3.x? [18:06] vorlon: sorry, the security team has still not been able to work on nftables === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson [18:43] hallyn: probably wouldn't bother with bionic at this point. In the past we've been pushing lxc and lxcfs through -backports as an option. If there's demand for that, we could do it easily enough but trying to SRU this fix on top of 3.0 probably isn't worth the trouble. [18:45] ok sounds good - thx [18:48] wait - do we no longer use ${release}-proposed as the target pocket? [18:54] hallyn: ${release} automatically redirects for SRUs. For backports I think you still need to use ${release}-backports [18:55] ${release}-proposed will still work, but IMHO it's ugly because the upload ends up in -updates in the end. [18:55] rbasak: thank you. [19:12] juliank: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=optimize=-lto dpkg-buildpackage ... [19:28] Is any core dev available to restart this test? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=s390x&package=ranger&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1 [19:30] and also http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=amd64&package=reprotest&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1 [19:35] JawnSmith: . [19:37] thanks again! [19:37] JawnSmith: yw! but going afk now [19:42] sarnold: so, are we going to promote it to main in advance of security review, or should it be unseeded? [19:42] vorlon: excellent question; I'd vote for unseed based solely on what I know of the situation, but whoever seeded it may feel strongly otherwise [19:43] xnox: ^^ [21:08] for any core dev still online here is a flurry of autopkgtest restart requests. I've looked into them all and they all just seem like flakey tests. [21:08] http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=groovy&arch=s390x&package=ranger&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-5ubuntu2.1 [21:08] http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=groovy&arch=arm64&package=postorius&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-5ubuntu2.1 [21:09] http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=groovy&arch=ppc64el&package=nodejs&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-5ubuntu2.1 [21:09] http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=groovy&arch=s390x&package=reprotest&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-5ubuntu2.1 [21:09] http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=ppc64el&package=reprotest&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1 [21:09] http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=focal&arch=amd64&package=xpra&trigger=procps/2%3A3.3.16-1ubuntu2.1 [21:55] JawnSmith: I can do those for you [22:03] Thanks bdmurray