[06:49] Good morning [06:49] morning === jelly-home is now known as jelly === denningsrogue67 is now known as denningsrogue6 === jelly is now known as jelly-home === jelly-home is now known as jelly === StathisA_ is now known as StathisA [12:23] very good, 3 years with amazon ec2 with ubuntu [13:34] jamespage: o/ looking at OVS. What's ltmain.sh about? I see commits in your packaging repo that say "Required to build with newver versions of dpdk and with as-needed" but in that case why is this only in your Groovy and not Focal upload? I don't see any mention in debian/changelog. [13:34] The patching of ltmain.sh that is. [13:47] rbasak: ah I see someone snuck in a commit or two with no changelog references... [13:47] coreycb might be able to answer that better? I'm not sure why it was required [13:47] coreycb: ^^ ? [13:52] rbasak: jamespage: It looks like that was (or should have been) a no-op on my end, a revert and then a revert of the revert [13:52] is it showing up in the debdiff or just the git log? [13:52] coreycb: it's in the diff between what's currently in Groovy and the Groovy unapproved upload [13:53] No, sorry, I'm wrong. [13:54] It's already in Groovy, and isn't changed by the Groovy unapproved upload. [13:54] But this means that it differs from the Focal unapproved upload. In Focal it isn't present. [13:54] (and nor is it in the Focal unapproved upload) [13:54] But since the DPDK versions are the same across Focal and Groovy now, I don't understand why it's appropriate in one or the other. [13:55] But since the DPDK versions are the same across Focal and Groovy now, I don't understand why it's appropriate in one but not the other. [13:55] The missing-from-changelog was me trying to understand, and not seeing it in the historical Groovy changelog [13:55] Oh no, hold on [13:55] It is in the diff [13:56] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NvwYYCwKDy/ [13:56] Lines 57 and 631 [14:01] I have a mtg now but I'll dig some more, I can't tell why it is in the diff yet [14:01] OK, thanks [14:43] I'm reverting that change and re-testing in PPA [14:45] jamespage: we should check with cpaelzer - I vaguely remember discussing with him [14:46] I think he may have sponsored it for Luca Boccassi [14:50] I think the reason it's showing up as a new change now is because 2.13.1-0ubuntu1.1 was superceded by security changes that didn't include it [15:56] I just found a great tool called ncdu [16:01] yeah its pretty nice [16:04] I am running it on / [16:07] is there anything in /var/log/journal I need or can I remove it? [16:09] MIF: journal logs. If you want to reclaim some space: sudo journalctl --vacuum-size=X (or other --vacuum-* flags) [16:09] for X do I put the size? [16:10] and what will that do? [16:11] MIF: "man journalctl" will give you all the nitty-gritty details [16:11] Ok [16:13] sdeziel: what would be a good size? [16:14] MIF: it's a local decision only you can make. I tend to like having a few days of available logs but if you don't consult those often, you can trim pretty aggressively [16:14] ok [16:14] you want to have at least enough logs to fix any problems... [16:15] MIF: if you'd like journald to not use too much in the long run, you might want to tune journald.conf (see it's man page for details) [16:16] ok [16:17] wow [16:17] that worked alot [16:17] thanks [16:17] I went from 88GB to 44GB [16:21] thank you so much sdeziel [16:22] MIF: you are welcome === ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch === Guest42978 is now known as catalase === ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson