[06:49] <lordievader> Good morning
[06:49] <luna> morning
[12:23] <ruimonteiro> very good, 3 years with amazon ec2 with ubuntu
[13:34] <rbasak> jamespage: o/ looking at OVS. What's ltmain.sh about? I see commits in your packaging repo that say "Required to build with newver versions of dpdk and with as-needed" but in that case why is this only in your Groovy and not Focal upload? I don't see any mention in debian/changelog.
[13:34] <rbasak> The patching of ltmain.sh that is.
[13:47] <jamespage> rbasak: ah I see someone snuck in a commit or two with no changelog references...
[13:47] <jamespage> coreycb might be able to answer that better? I'm not sure why it was required
[13:47] <jamespage> coreycb: ^^ ?
[13:52] <coreycb> rbasak: jamespage: It looks like that was (or should have been) a no-op on my end, a revert and then a revert of the revert
[13:52] <coreycb> is it showing up in the debdiff or just the git log?
[13:52] <rbasak> coreycb: it's in the diff between what's currently in Groovy and the Groovy unapproved upload
[13:53] <rbasak> No, sorry, I'm wrong.
[13:54] <rbasak> It's already in Groovy, and isn't changed by the Groovy unapproved upload.
[13:54] <rbasak> But this means that it differs from the Focal unapproved upload. In Focal it isn't present.
[13:54] <rbasak> (and nor is it in the Focal unapproved upload)
[13:54] <rbasak> But since the DPDK versions are the same across Focal and Groovy now, I don't understand why it's appropriate in one or the other.
[13:55] <rbasak> But since the DPDK versions are the same across Focal and Groovy now, I don't understand why it's appropriate in one but not the other.
[13:55] <rbasak> The missing-from-changelog was me trying to understand, and not seeing it in the historical Groovy changelog
[13:55] <rbasak> Oh no, hold on
[13:55] <rbasak> It is in the diff
[13:56] <rbasak> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NvwYYCwKDy/
[13:56] <rbasak> Lines 57 and 631
[14:01] <coreycb> I have a mtg now but I'll dig some more, I can't tell why it is in the diff yet
[14:01] <rbasak> OK, thanks
[14:43] <jamespage> I'm reverting that change and re-testing in PPA
[14:45] <coreycb> jamespage: we should check with cpaelzer - I vaguely remember discussing with him
[14:46] <coreycb> I think he may have sponsored it for Luca Boccassi
[14:50] <coreycb> I think the reason it's showing up as a new change now is because 2.13.1-0ubuntu1.1 was superceded by security changes that didn't include it
[15:56] <MIF> I just found a great tool called ncdu
[16:01] <mybalzitch> yeah its pretty nice
[16:04] <MIF> I am running it on /
[16:07] <MIF> is there anything in /var/log/journal I need or can I remove it?
[16:09] <sdeziel> MIF: journal logs. If you want to reclaim some space: sudo journalctl --vacuum-size=X (or other --vacuum-* flags)
[16:09] <MIF> for X do I put the size?
[16:10] <MIF> and what will that do?
[16:11] <sdeziel> MIF: "man journalctl" will give you all the nitty-gritty details
[16:11] <MIF> Ok
[16:13] <MIF> sdeziel: what would be a good size?
[16:14] <sdeziel> MIF: it's a local decision only you can make. I tend to like having a few days of available logs but if you don't consult those often, you can trim pretty aggressively
[16:14] <MIF> ok
[16:14] <JanC> you want to have at least enough logs to fix any problems...
[16:15] <sdeziel> MIF: if you'd like journald to not use too much in the long run, you might want to tune journald.conf (see it's man page for details)
[16:16] <MIF> ok
[16:17] <MIF> wow
[16:17] <MIF> that worked alot
[16:17] <MIF> thanks
[16:17] <MIF> I went from 88GB to 44GB
[16:21] <MIF> thank you so much sdeziel
[16:22] <sdeziel> MIF: you are welcome