[05:52] <rbasak> On Groovy, apt autoremove wants to remove libel-api-java libhsqldb1.8.0-java libjsp-api-java libreoffice-sdbc-hsqld libservlet-api-java libservlet3.1-java libwebsocket-api-java. But if I do that, update-manager wants to install them again. So I have a loop.
[05:52] <rbasak> Something to do with phasing perhaps? Still seems wrong.
[05:52]  * rbasak was about about upgrade to Hirsute...
[08:07] <RikMills> jibel: was this an essential change? sip.enableautoconversion(QtCore.QVariant, False)
[08:07] <RikMills> in https://git.launchpad.net/ubiquity/commit/?id=0ffb72be73e22d201e40e153eea0c678d70a4532
[08:09] <RikMills> seems to be the thing that started the crash of LP: #1903378
[08:09] <RikMills> wrong bug
[08:09] <RikMills> LP: #1912327
[08:10] <RikMills> i.e. crashed with TypeError: unhashable type: 'QVariant'
[08:10] <RikMills> commenting out those, I get no crash
[08:26] <seb128> anyone wanting to review a trivial python3.9 fix for software-properties to fix the mirror selection dialog?
[08:26] <seb128> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+merge/401192
[08:38] <juliank> seb128: lgtm
[09:29] <seb128> juliank, thx
[09:49] <xnox> I tried run_autopkgtest setting in my .sbuildrc but it doesn't work for me.
[09:49] <xnox> for every build it says that blah blah my .dsc is not valid or some such.
[09:49] <xnox> does one have to build the source package inside sbuild to have autopkgtest work?
[09:49] <xnox> i normally always build source packages on the host, not inside sbuild.
[13:08] <sil2100> mvo: hey! Sorry to poke you about that but I somehow remember you being the DDTP person in the past - am I misremembering something?
[13:09] <sil2100> Since we'd need to update the translations for that
[13:09] <sil2100> Is this still valid?
[13:10] <sil2100> hm, I don't see a hirsute branch even
[13:22] <mvo> sil2100: that's right, let me poke this after my current meeting
[13:22] <sil2100> Thanks!
[14:53] <hallyn> Hi - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1923232  - i forget, do i need to do something like subscribe ubuntu-sru to the bug to have someone look at the package to accept it?
[14:55] <bdmurray> hallyn: The SRU team works off the unapproved queue so if its uploaded that's enough
[14:57] <hallyn> bdmurray: hm, ok.   i've lost the link - where do i find the unapproved queue ?  :-)
[14:58] <bdmurray> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1
[14:58] <bdmurray> replace the release name as appropriate
[14:58] <hallyn> thanks bdmurray !
[14:59] <hallyn> sru team overloaded i gather
[15:00] <hallyn> wonder if that's a place i can help out
[15:00] <bdmurray> Quite a few SRU team members are also release team members so this kind of backlog around release happens regularly
[15:02] <bdmurray> hallyn: Help out as in join the team or help out as in lend a hand for a brief period of time? If its the latter you could look for stuff to reject. ;-)
[15:06] <remline> I also see https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
[15:10] <bdmurray> remline: those are the packages already in -proposed the unapproved queue are ones waiting to go into -proposed
[15:27] <hallyn> bdmurray: was thinking the former.
[15:28] <hallyn> vetting the packages against the linked bugs is something i think i'd be up to doing
[15:32] <bdmurray> Well you could review some, see what you think and ask somebody to double check / do the actual approval.
[15:47] <hallyn> yup