sil2100Ok, I see base-files and python-apt didn't migrate yet, I skiptested those as they're packages with non-functional changes07:18
sil2100Once those migrate, I think it's time to build our first RC set!07:20
xnoxahasenack: it would be interesting for you to reflash your bios. You should be able to either download a capsule to put on usb stick. Or download freedos onto usb stick + bios update.07:31
xnoxWe had previously had laptops that were possible to recover to normality with reflashed bios.07:31
guivercI just noticed something & commented on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1924823  (reason there is a 'missing' message juliank said was there maybe)07:45
ubot3Launchpad bug 1924823 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ESP on install medium automatically configured as ESP for install, failing install" [Undecided, Fix Released]07:45
dokovorlon: well, it showed up on component mismatches ...07:54
Laneydoko: can we promote xwayland? I did the subscriber yesterday08:17
dokoLaney: sure, doing. just tell here when doing the subscription08:18
LaneyI did it08:18
Laneyor I thought I did anyway, sorry if I didn't 😬08:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [460.56-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (i386-whitelist)08:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [460.56-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)08:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (focal-proposed/restricted) [460.56-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)08:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist)08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 390.143-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-desktop)08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 390.143-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (focal-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 390.143-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)08:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (i386-whitelist)08:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)08:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (bionic-proposed/restricted) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 418.197.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kernel-dkms)08:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)08:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (focal-proposed/multiverse) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 418.197.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (kernel-dkms)08:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist)08:27
juliankguiverc: The hidden message below the space bar (for lack of better word)? It says "Your install medium is /dev/... You will not be able to create or ... on that disk"08:37
guivercwasn't very readable  (i sure couldn't make it out... but you said there was a message!  I found it I think)08:40
guivercgood news was the install worked (updated ubiquity)08:41
juliankguiverc: Well that message is visible for a second and then crushed by the space allocation bar at the top and the partition list below it :D08:44
juliankguiverc: It's the shadows under the orange bar in https://people.canonical.com/~laney/weird-things/text.png08:44
juliankguiverc: I've also talked about other messages, so I might confuse things08:44
guivercmaybe the second is shorter due to my old-slow c2d box.. it didn't pause drawing display that I noticed, appeared only to flash before08:45
* guiverc or the delay between prior event had me mentally zone out & I didn't notice text before it was being erased.... more likely probably08:54
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 [source] (groovy-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]09:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (groovy-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]09:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (groovy-proposed) [390.143-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]09:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]09:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]09:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 [source] (focal-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]09:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (focal-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]09:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (focal-proposed) [390.143-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]09:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server [source] (focal-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]09:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (focal-proposed) [418.197.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 [source] (bionic-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (bionic-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]09:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (bionic-proposed) [390.143-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]09:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]10:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [418.197.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]10:05
sil2100xnox: hey! Could you check for us which subiquity version is in the stable ubuntu 21.04 branch? Since we can't see these branches by ourselves10:14
xnoxsil2100: will do in a moment. Walking back from Starbucks.10:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:20210225-1ubuntu1 => 1:20210420-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)10:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:20210420-1ubuntu1]10:23
sil2100xnox: thanks!10:26
sil2100Anyway, everyone: first RC images will be building shortly!10:26
xnoxsil2100:  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/nmTNcm8nKx/10:34
xnox21.04.1+git5.046949f0 is the "version" we are looking for10:35
xnoxrevisions 2387 .. 239010:35
xnoxlet me check if there are any unapproved10:35
Laneygive it a nice version number 😬10:37
xnoxno unreleased / unapproved builds10:38
lunasil2100: can you ping me when they are up10:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (bionic-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added11:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added11:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added11:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added11:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added11:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added11:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 418.197.02-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core, kernel-dkms)11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)11:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [418.197.02-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]11:27
lunaDesktop ISOs is built now11:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (focal-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]11:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (focal-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]11:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)12:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (focal-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added12:08
patviaforesil2100: it is unlikely that we are going to get root cause and fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1919177 by Thursday as it stands. This is an intermittent issue on Azure that doesn't always present itself. Should we just release note it as a known issue (with the understanding that we are still driving hard to fixing it)?12:41
ubot3Launchpad bug 1919177 in cloud-init "Azure: issues with accelerated networking on Hirsute" [Undecided, Incomplete]12:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (hirsute-proposed/main) [7.0.0-2ubuntu1 => 7.0.0-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server, virt)13:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu2 => 1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server, virt)13:04
cpaelzerHi release-team people - just FYI the qemu&libvirt uploads that just showed up for Hirsute are meant as zero-day (or slightly later) SRUs. They are tested (by me and bug reporters) and reviewed (even for SRU POV) by rbasak13:05
cpaelzerThe bugs and associated MPs hold all the details you'd need13:06
paridesil2100, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1925211 <- the bug I mentioned you13:34
ubot3Launchpad bug 1925211 in linux (Ubuntu) "Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute" [Undecided, Confirmed]13:34
paridecpaelzer, ^^13:34
cpaelzeryep - I'm doing further debug and I'm around in case there are questions13:40
cpaelzerthanks paride13:40
parideapw, could you have a look at that one?13:40
apwsforshee, ^13:41
rbalintcpaelzer, this may be related https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/4d484e14bb9864cef1d124885e625f33bf31e91c/NEWS#L513:43
paridecpaelzer, added it to bugs to watch https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/hirsute-hippo-21-04-release-status-tracking/13:45
sforsheeapw: ack13:45
cpaelzerok, I'm trying to test through minline builds atm13:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (hirsute-proposed/main) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu2 => 21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu3] (core, ubuntu-cloud)13:55
=== plars_ is now known as plars
pariderbalint, that's a good heads-up but I'm not sure there's that change behind the issue cpaelzer found14:15
paridehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1925211/comments/15 shows no udev events on detach on Hirsute, while Groovy shows events on detach14:17
ubot3Launchpad bug 1925211 in linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) "Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute" [Undecided, Confirmed]14:17
cpaelzerso far I can pin this to mainline kernel v5.10..v5.1114:17
parideI don't think the new tags concept is enough to explain that14:17
cpaelzerjust updated the case14:17
rbalintparide, cpaelzer ack, likely the kernel causes it14:17
cpaelzerI agree to paride - since there is NO even at all I think it is more likely that we look at a kernel issue14:17
sil2100apw, sforshee: ^14:18
cpaelzersforshee: I'm down to offer kernel bisection testing for 5.10..5.11 - the question is do I loose more time setting up a kernel build than you do setting up a test env :-) ?14:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)14:22
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (groovy-proposed/main) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.10.1 => 21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.10.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)14:45
sforsheecpaelzer: it would be helpful if you are able to bisect, then I can pursue a parallel course of attack15:00
cpaelzersforshee: I have already started to break my builds15:02
cpaelzersforshee: expect that I'll bisect it unless I let you know that I'm stuck15:02
sforsheecpaelzer: let me confirm, you're testing these kernels in the guest?15:04
cpaelzersforshee: yes15:08
cpaelzerHost kernel and virtualization userspace components seem not to matter - the kernel level in the guest is what breaks the camels back15:09
sforsheethanks, just wanted to double check15:10
xnoxsil2100:  vorlon: any idea how come http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-base/releases/16.04/release/ubuntu-base-16.04-core-amd64.tar.gz is now gone? and is the .6-base-amd64.tar.gz suitable replacement for it?15:46
xnoxis rename due to finally doing core-vs-base fix that landed before we did .6 release?15:50
coreycbhello release team, our last upload for openstack is in the hirsute unapproved queue. heat-dashboard. would we be able to get that accepted?16:08
cpaelzersforshee: the build of both starting points worked, so I guess the bisect will work as well16:09
cpaelzerprobably not scripted since I have to set it up each time, but one step at a time16:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-15 (hirsute-proposed/universe) [15.0.2+7-1 => 15.0.3+3-1] (i386-whitelist)18:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (hirsute-proposed/main) [11.0.11+8-0ubuntu2 => 11.0.11+9-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)18:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-15 [source] (hirsute-proposed) [15.0.3+3-1]18:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [source] (hirsute-proposed) [11.0.11+9-0ubuntu1]18:56
cpaelzersforshee: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/1925211/comments/1920:02
ubot3Launchpad bug 1925211 in linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) "Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute" [Undecided, Confirmed]20:02
bdmurraycpaelzer: so this is s390x specific?20:04
vorlonwhyyyy are there new priority mismatches during release week https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/priority-mismatches.html20:04
vorlonoh no there aren't, I am just looking at the i386 mismatches for the first time, hee20:07
sforsheecpaelzer: nice, you made better progress than I have20:07
tarzeau_is the codename after hirsute already know? and the next lts release codename?20:08
vorlontarzeau_: no20:08
cjwatsonI admire your optimism20:08
tarzeau_at least i know the first letter i and j ;)20:08
sforsheebdmurray: yes, s390x specific20:14
vorlonWimpress: hi, now that we're 2 days from the release, I wonder if you would like a higher limit declared for the Ubuntu MATE images which have basically been listed as oversized all cycle20:15
vorlonWimpress: also there are no contact addresses listed for notifying anyone about mate images being oversized, would you like to set one?20:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.04.2] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)20:29
sforsheecpaelzer: I put a kernel at https://people.canonical.com/~sforshee/lp1925211/ which is the hiruste-release kernel plus a revert of that commit. Can you confirm that it fixes the bug?20:37
vorlonrbalint: wrt your dpkg SRU, I don't consider autoreconf cruft anything that counts against it, and I don't review changes to autogenerated files20:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.18.4ubuntu1.7]20:46
bdmurrayHrm the Ubuntu Kylin slideshow mentions the 5.8 kernel20:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.18-dfsg-5ubuntu1.21.04.1 => 6.1.20-dfsg-1ubuntu1.21.04.1] (kernel-dkms)20:52
bdmurrayOh and archive.ubuntukylin.com doesn't resolve.21:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)21:29
Odd_Blokebdmurray: There are regression-addressing cloud-inits in all the unapproved queues, would you be able to release them?  (Note that we're just running this as a regular SRU, because the verification is small enough that our exception paperwork would be more work.)21:32
bdmurrayOdd_Bloke: its "accept" to -proposed and "release" to -updates please update your internal dictionary accordingly21:33
bdmurrayOdd_Bloke: I'll have a look shortly21:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.43 => 1:18.04.44] (core)21:47
Odd_Blokebdmurray: I said what I said #yolo21:50
bdmurrayUpgrading from Trusty‽21:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (groovy-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.10.2]21:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.04.2]22:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]22:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~16.04.2]22:04
bdmurrayvorlon: I uploaded an update to ubuntu-release-upgrader for the Xenial to Bionic snap stuff see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1922297/comments/18 for details.22:22
ubot3Launchpad bug 1922297 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Groovy) "20.10 to 21.04: snap does not upgrade channel" [Undecided, Fix Committed]22:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.102-0ubuntu1~20.04.2]23:07
xnoxbdmurray:  vorlon: u-boot / u-boot-menu / unmatched saga continues. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1925267 we have reverted u-boot-menu to not load kernel provide dtbs, because there isn't one for qemu and hence qemu was failing to boot.23:31
ubot3Launchpad bug 1925267 in u-boot (Ubuntu) "u-boot unmatched dtb does not match kernel dtb" [Undecided, New]23:31
xnoxbut the u-boot unmatched dtb has difference from the kernel one.23:31
xnoxmaking unmatched hw support not work right.23:31
xnoxas reported by cking.23:32
xnoxunleashed board dtbs are stable.23:32
xnoxthis kind of makes the unmatched image unreleasable, until we fix up either u-boot/u-boot-menu one way or the other.23:33
bdmurrayxnox: and you are suggesting updating u-boot?23:35
xnoxbdmurray:  upload u-boot with updated unmatched dtb23:40
xnoxbdmurray:  sacrifice and say that qemu booting is not supported until u-boot srus, by reverting u-boot-menu back to previous upload.23:41
bdmurrayxnox: How would a u-boot SRU help qemu booting w/o a new image?23:43
vorlonxnox: bootability of the unmatched image on unmatched hardware is strictly more important than bootability in qemu.  Especially if the unleashed image boots on both.23:43
xnoxvorlon:  revert of u-boot-menu will make both images no longer boot in qemu, until we fix uboot-qemu-smode23:44
xnoxbut both images will boot correctly on their respective boards unleashed & unmatched.23:44
vorlonthat's not ideal23:44
vorlonI would take a u-boot update pre-release with an updated dtb23:45
vorlonhow soon can we have it?23:45
xnoxbut i see lots of new features in dtbs in meta-sifive layers23:45
xnoxie. adding led support colors "purple for uboot stage" "this color for this stage"23:46
xnoxpwm etc.23:46
xnoxnone of the things we care about.23:46
vorlonwaveform, plars: ^^ fyi this will regrettably impact rpi image testing23:46
xnoxvorlon:  why?23:46
xnoxvorlon:  classic images stopped using uboot, have they not?23:47
xnox*classic pi23:47

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!