[07:18] <sil2100> Ok, I see base-files and python-apt didn't migrate yet, I skiptested those as they're packages with non-functional changes
[07:20] <sil2100> Once those migrate, I think it's time to build our first RC set!
[07:31] <xnox> ahasenack: it would be interesting for you to reflash your bios. You should be able to either download a capsule to put on usb stick. Or download freedos onto usb stick + bios update.
[07:31] <xnox> We had previously had laptops that were possible to recover to normality with reflashed bios.
[07:45] <guiverc> I just noticed something & commented on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1924823  (reason there is a 'missing' message juliank said was there maybe)
[07:45] <ubot3> Launchpad bug 1924823 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ESP on install medium automatically configured as ESP for install, failing install" [Undecided, Fix Released]
[07:54] <doko> vorlon: well, it showed up on component mismatches ...
[08:17] <Laney> doko: can we promote xwayland? I did the subscriber yesterday
[08:18] <doko> Laney: sure, doing. just tell here when doing the subscription
[08:18] <Laney> I did it
[08:19] <Laney> or I thought I did anyway, sorry if I didn't 😬
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [460.56-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (i386-whitelist)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [460.56-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 (focal-proposed/restricted) [460.56-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 390.143-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (groovy-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 390.143-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (focal-proposed/restricted) [390.141-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 390.143-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (i386-whitelist)
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (bionic-proposed/restricted) [460.32.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 418.197.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (focal-proposed/multiverse) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 418.197.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[08:37] <juliank> guiverc: The hidden message below the space bar (for lack of better word)? It says "Your install medium is /dev/... You will not be able to create or ... on that disk"
[08:40] <guiverc> wasn't very readable  (i sure couldn't make it out... but you said there was a message!  I found it I think)
[08:41] <guiverc> good news was the install worked (updated ubiquity)
[08:44] <juliank> guiverc: Well that message is visible for a second and then crushed by the space allocation bar at the top and the partition list below it :D
[08:44] <juliank> guiverc: It's the shadows under the orange bar in https://people.canonical.com/~laney/weird-things/text.png
[08:44] <juliank> guiverc: I've also talked about other messages, so I might confuse things
[08:45] <guiverc> maybe the second is shorter due to my old-slow c2d box.. it didn't pause drawing display that I noticed, appeared only to flash before
[08:54]  * guiverc or the delay between prior event had me mentally zone out & I didn't notice text before it was being erased.... more likely probably
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 [source] (groovy-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (groovy-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (groovy-proposed) [390.143-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 [source] (focal-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (focal-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (focal-proposed) [390.143-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server [source] (focal-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (focal-proposed) [418.197.02-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 [source] (bionic-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 [source] (bionic-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (bionic-proposed) [390.143-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[10:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [418.197.02-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[10:14] <sil2100> xnox: hey! Could you check for us which subiquity version is in the stable ubuntu 21.04 branch? Since we can't see these branches by ourselves
[10:19] <xnox> sil2100: will do in a moment. Walking back from Starbucks.
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:20210225-1ubuntu1 => 1:20210420-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:20210420-1ubuntu1]
[10:26] <sil2100> xnox: thanks!
[10:26] <sil2100> Anyway, everyone: first RC images will be building shortly!
[10:34] <xnox> sil2100:  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/nmTNcm8nKx/
[10:35] <xnox> 21.04.1+git5.046949f0 is the "version" we are looking for
[10:35] <xnox> revisions 2387 .. 2390
[10:35] <xnox> let me check if there are any unapproved
[10:37] <Laney> give it a nice version number 😬
[10:38] <xnox> no unreleased / unapproved builds
[10:49] <luna> sil2100: can you ping me when they are up
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (bionic-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (bionic-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (groovy-proposed/restricted) [418.181.07-0ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 418.197.02-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (core, kernel-dkms)
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [418.197.02-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[11:34] <luna> Desktop ISOs is built now
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (focal-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (focal-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.102.04-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server [source] (focal-proposed) [450.119.03-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Hirsute Final] (20210420) has been added
[12:41] <patviafore> sil2100: it is unlikely that we are going to get root cause and fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1919177 by Thursday as it stands. This is an intermittent issue on Azure that doesn't always present itself. Should we just release note it as a known issue (with the understanding that we are still driving hard to fixing it)?
[12:41] <ubot3> Launchpad bug 1919177 in cloud-init "Azure: issues with accelerated networking on Hirsute" [Undecided, Incomplete]
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (hirsute-proposed/main) [7.0.0-2ubuntu1 => 7.0.0-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu2 => 1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:05] <cpaelzer> Hi release-team people - just FYI the qemu&libvirt uploads that just showed up for Hirsute are meant as zero-day (or slightly later) SRUs. They are tested (by me and bug reporters) and reviewed (even for SRU POV) by rbasak
[13:06] <cpaelzer> The bugs and associated MPs hold all the details you'd need
[13:34] <paride> sil2100, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1925211 <- the bug I mentioned you
[13:34] <ubot3> Launchpad bug 1925211 in linux (Ubuntu) "Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[13:34] <paride> cpaelzer, ^^
[13:40] <cpaelzer> yep - I'm doing further debug and I'm around in case there are questions
[13:40] <cpaelzer> thanks paride
[13:40] <paride> apw, could you have a look at that one?
[13:41] <apw> sforshee, ^
[13:43] <rbalint> cpaelzer, this may be related https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/4d484e14bb9864cef1d124885e625f33bf31e91c/NEWS#L5
[13:45] <paride> cpaelzer, added it to bugs to watch https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/hirsute-hippo-21-04-release-status-tracking/
[13:45] <sforshee> apw: ack
[13:46] <cpaelzer> ok, I'm trying to test through minline builds atm
[13:46] <cpaelzer> "mainline"
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (hirsute-proposed/main) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu2 => 21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu3] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
=== plars_ is now known as plars
[14:15] <paride> rbalint, that's a good heads-up but I'm not sure there's that change behind the issue cpaelzer found
[14:17] <paride> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1925211/comments/15 shows no udev events on detach on Hirsute, while Groovy shows events on detach
[14:17] <ubot3> Launchpad bug 1925211 in linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) "Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[14:17] <cpaelzer> so far I can pin this to mainline kernel v5.10..v5.11
[14:17] <paride> I don't think the new tags concept is enough to explain that
[14:17] <cpaelzer> just updated the case
[14:17] <rbalint> paride, cpaelzer ack, likely the kernel causes it
[14:17] <cpaelzer> I agree to paride - since there is NO even at all I think it is more likely that we look at a kernel issue
[14:18] <cpaelzer> s/even/event/
[14:18] <sil2100> apw, sforshee: ^
[14:18] <cpaelzer> sforshee: I'm down to offer kernel bisection testing for 5.10..5.11 - the question is do I loose more time setting up a kernel build than you do setting up a test env :-) ?
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210420)
=== didrocks999 is now known as didrocks
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (groovy-proposed/main) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.10.1 => 21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.10.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[15:00] <sforshee> cpaelzer: it would be helpful if you are able to bisect, then I can pursue a parallel course of attack
[15:02] <cpaelzer> sforshee: I have already started to break my builds
[15:02] <sforshee> ta
[15:02] <cpaelzer> sforshee: expect that I'll bisect it unless I let you know that I'm stuck
[15:04] <sforshee> cpaelzer: let me confirm, you're testing these kernels in the guest?
[15:08] <cpaelzer> sforshee: yes
[15:09] <cpaelzer> Host kernel and virtualization userspace components seem not to matter - the kernel level in the guest is what breaks the camels back
[15:10] <sforshee> thanks, just wanted to double check
[15:46] <xnox> sil2100:  vorlon: any idea how come http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-base/releases/16.04/release/ubuntu-base-16.04-core-amd64.tar.gz is now gone? and is the .6-base-amd64.tar.gz suitable replacement for it?
[15:50] <xnox> is rename due to finally doing core-vs-base fix that landed before we did .6 release?
[16:08] <coreycb> hello release team, our last upload for openstack is in the hirsute unapproved queue. heat-dashboard. would we be able to get that accepted?
[16:09] <cpaelzer> sforshee: the build of both starting points worked, so I guess the bisect will work as well
[16:09] <cpaelzer> probably not scripted since I have to set it up each time, but one step at a time
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-15 (hirsute-proposed/universe) [15.0.2+7-1 => 15.0.3+3-1] (i386-whitelist)
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (hirsute-proposed/main) [11.0.11+8-0ubuntu2 => 11.0.11+9-0ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-15 [source] (hirsute-proposed) [15.0.3+3-1]
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [source] (hirsute-proposed) [11.0.11+9-0ubuntu1]
[20:02] <cpaelzer> sforshee: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/1925211/comments/19
[20:02] <ubot3> Launchpad bug 1925211 in linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) "Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken block devices around in Hirsute" [Undecided, Confirmed]
[20:04] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: so this is s390x specific?
[20:04] <vorlon> whyyyy are there new priority mismatches during release week https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/priority-mismatches.html
[20:07] <vorlon> oh no there aren't, I am just looking at the i386 mismatches for the first time, hee
[20:07] <sforshee> cpaelzer: nice, you made better progress than I have
[20:08] <tarzeau_> is the codename after hirsute already know? and the next lts release codename?
[20:08] <vorlon> tarzeau_: no
[20:08] <cjwatson> I admire your optimism
[20:08] <tarzeau_> at least i know the first letter i and j ;)
[20:14] <sforshee> bdmurray: yes, s390x specific
[20:15] <vorlon> Wimpress: hi, now that we're 2 days from the release, I wonder if you would like a higher limit declared for the Ubuntu MATE images which have basically been listed as oversized all cycle
[20:16] <vorlon> Wimpress: also there are no contact addresses listed for notifying anyone about mate images being oversized, would you like to set one?
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.04.2] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[20:37] <sforshee> cpaelzer: I put a kernel at https://people.canonical.com/~sforshee/lp1925211/ which is the hiruste-release kernel plus a revert of that commit. Can you confirm that it fixes the bug?
[20:42] <vorlon> rbalint: wrt your dpkg SRU, I don't consider autoreconf cruft anything that counts against it, and I don't review changes to autogenerated files
[20:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.18.4ubuntu1.7]
[20:48] <bdmurray> Hrm the Ubuntu Kylin slideshow mentions the 5.8 kernel
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.18-dfsg-5ubuntu1.21.04.1 => 6.1.20-dfsg-1ubuntu1.21.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[21:13] <bdmurray> Oh and archive.ubuntukylin.com doesn't resolve.
[21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[21:32] <Odd_Bloke> bdmurray: There are regression-addressing cloud-inits in all the unapproved queues, would you be able to release them?  (Note that we're just running this as a regular SRU, because the verification is small enough that our exception paperwork would be more work.)
[21:33] <bdmurray> Odd_Bloke: its "accept" to -proposed and "release" to -updates please update your internal dictionary accordingly
[21:35] <bdmurray> Odd_Bloke: I'll have a look shortly
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.43 => 1:18.04.44] (core)
[21:50] <Odd_Bloke> bdmurray: I said what I said #yolo
[21:50] <Odd_Bloke> (Thanks!)
[21:53] <bdmurray> Upgrading from Trusty‽
[21:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (groovy-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.10.2]
[22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~20.04.2]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~18.04.2]
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu1~16.04.2]
[22:22] <bdmurray> vorlon: I uploaded an update to ubuntu-release-upgrader for the Xenial to Bionic snap stuff see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1922297/comments/18 for details.
[22:22] <ubot3> Launchpad bug 1922297 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Groovy) "20.10 to 21.04: snap does not upgrade channel" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (focal-proposed) [0.102-0ubuntu1~20.04.2]
[23:31] <xnox> bdmurray:  vorlon: u-boot / u-boot-menu / unmatched saga continues. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1925267 we have reverted u-boot-menu to not load kernel provide dtbs, because there isn't one for qemu and hence qemu was failing to boot.
[23:31] <ubot3> Launchpad bug 1925267 in u-boot (Ubuntu) "u-boot unmatched dtb does not match kernel dtb" [Undecided, New]
[23:31] <xnox> but the u-boot unmatched dtb has difference from the kernel one.
[23:31] <xnox> making unmatched hw support not work right.
[23:32] <xnox> as reported by cking.
[23:32] <xnox> unleashed board dtbs are stable.
[23:33] <xnox> this kind of makes the unmatched image unreleasable, until we fix up either u-boot/u-boot-menu one way or the other.
[23:35] <bdmurray> xnox: and you are suggesting updating u-boot?
[23:40] <xnox> bdmurray:  upload u-boot with updated unmatched dtb
[23:41] <xnox> bdmurray:  sacrifice and say that qemu booting is not supported until u-boot srus, by reverting u-boot-menu back to previous upload.
[23:43] <bdmurray> xnox: How would a u-boot SRU help qemu booting w/o a new image?
[23:43] <vorlon> xnox: bootability of the unmatched image on unmatched hardware is strictly more important than bootability in qemu.  Especially if the unleashed image boots on both.
[23:44] <xnox> vorlon:  revert of u-boot-menu will make both images no longer boot in qemu, until we fix uboot-qemu-smode
[23:44] <xnox> but both images will boot correctly on their respective boards unleashed & unmatched.
[23:44] <vorlon> that's not ideal
[23:45] <vorlon> I would take a u-boot update pre-release with an updated dtb
[23:45] <xnox> ack
[23:45] <vorlon> how soon can we have it?
[23:45] <xnox> but i see lots of new features in dtbs in meta-sifive layers
[23:46] <xnox> ie. adding led support colors "purple for uboot stage" "this color for this stage"
[23:46] <xnox> pwm etc.
[23:46] <xnox> none of the things we care about.
[23:46] <vorlon> waveform, plars: ^^ fyi this will regrettably impact rpi image testing
[23:46] <vorlon> s/impact/reset/
[23:46] <xnox> vorlon:  why?
[23:47] <xnox> vorlon:  classic images stopped using uboot, have they not?
[23:47] <xnox> *classic pi