/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/04/21/#ubuntu-release.txt

xnoxi don't feel comfortable taking meta-sifive patches; i'd rather take our kernel's dtb into uboot.00:02
xnoxwe must load matching dtb from kernel going forward.00:03
vorlonxnox: livecd-rootfs still pulls u-boot-rpi into the classic images00:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.8.5-1ubuntu0.1]00:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rabbitmq-server [source] (focal-proposed) [3.8.2-0ubuntu1.2]00:58
xnoxwaveform:  for next release we can drop pullin gin u-boot-rpi right? or do we still need for upgrades?01:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mkosi [source] (groovy-proposed) [5-1ubuntu0.20.10.1]01:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mkosi [source] (focal-proposed) [5-1ubuntu0.20.04.1]01:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-1ubuntu0.4]02:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thermald [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.3-4ubuntu1]02:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot-menu (hirsute-proposed/main) [4.0.2ubuntu4 => 4.0.2ubuntu5] (core)02:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (hirsute-proposed/main) [2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu7 => 2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu8] (core)02:37
xnoxvorlon:  bdmurray: i'm failing to reconcile dtb in kernel & u-boot, as they both have different drivers that expect different dtb.02:38
xnoxthus going back to u-boot-menu ubuntu3 which generates fdtdir option in extlinux.conf thus making u-boot load matching kernel's dtb for every kernel it loads.02:39
xnoxand u-boot upload that makes fdtdir option be skipped on qemu-riscv64_smode target, and instead just carry on using dtd that is already loaded in ram.02:39
xnoxuploaded both of those things into https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4532/+packages too02:39
xnoxwill build unleashed & unmatched images out of there. which should work correctly on unleashed, unmatched, and qemu.02:40
xnoxi tested qemu with local build of the two already.02:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwacom [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3-2ubuntu2]03:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-16 (hirsute-proposed/universe) [16+36-3 => 16.0.1+9-1] (i386-whitelist)03:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-16 [source] (hirsute-proposed) [16.0.1+9-1]03:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-snapshot (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:20210420-1ubuntu1 => 1:20210421-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)04:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-snapshot [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:20210421-1ubuntu1]04:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nautilus (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:3.38.2-1ubuntu1 => 1:3.38.2-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)05:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.18-1 => 6.1.20-1] (no packageset) (sync)06:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.18-dfsg-5 => 6.1.20-dfsg-1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud) (sync)06:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.18-1 => 6.1.20-1] (no packageset) (sync)06:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [6.1.20-1]06:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [6.1.20-1]06:56
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, can virtualbox-hwe go away now that xserver-xorg-dev-hwe-18.04 is not a real thing anymore?07:02
LocutusOfBorgI can provide the -hwe packages into the main virtualbox package so upgrades are ensured07:02
LocutusOfBorgI was not aware xorg-hwe was disappeared07:02
tjaaltonxserver-xorg-dev-hwe-18.04?07:15
tjaaltonit's still provided by the xorg-lts-transitionals package, or what do you mean?07:16
LocutusOfBorgtjaalton, but do we still have two different hwe stacks on each Ubuntu release?08:08
LocutusOfBorgI mean, I had introduced virtualbox-hwe because some people were using newer xorg on their system08:09
LocutusOfBorgis this still the case?08:09
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: not for focal, at least not yet08:10
LocutusOfBorgso now virtualbox-hwe is the same as virtualbox, wrt provided binaries and compatibility with stacks08:10
LocutusOfBorgand once you upgrade xorg on focal, a no-change rebuild will "fix it"08:10
LocutusOfBorgright?08:10
tjaaltonsounds about right08:10
tjaaltoneven if there is a new major release upstream within the next year, I'm not sure it's worth a backport08:11
tjaaltonbut we'll see08:11
LocutusOfBorgwill it be called maybe xserver-xorg-dev-hwe-20.04?08:19
LocutusOfBorgso in that case vbox will need a little change in control file08:19
tjaaltonprobably, follows the same naming as before08:19
LocutusOfBorgI was hoping to see an -hwe versionless package08:19
LocutusOfBorgmy vbox-hwe doesn't have such numbers...08:19
LocutusOfBorgbut nothing important :)08:20
seb128do we accept 0 days SRUs already at this point?08:26
seb128I would like the nautilus in the queue to be one please08:26
tjaaltonLocutusOfBorg: that would break upgrades, the point is that the 'old-lts stack' users would get upgraded to the next-lts GA stack, and not be kept on hwe forever08:27
Laneyseb128: not yet but noted08:29
seb128Laney, thanks08:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed eglexternalplatform from i386-whitelist in hirsute08:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed python-atomicwrites from i386-whitelist in hirsute08:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed wcwidth from i386-whitelist in hirsute08:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libz-mingw-w64 to i386-whitelist in hirsute08:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot-menu (hirsute-proposed/main) [4.0.2ubuntu4 => 4.0.2ubuntu5] (core) (sync)08:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (hirsute-proposed/main) [2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu7 => 2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu8] (core) (sync)08:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected u-boot-menu [source] (hirsute-proposed) [4.0.2ubuntu5]08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected u-boot [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu8]08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot-menu [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [4.0.2ubuntu5]08:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu8]08:48
LocutusOfBorgit would be nice to accept virtualbox and virtualbox-hwe please08:56
LocutusOfBorgthey contains some really needed fixes...08:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (hirsute-proposed/main) [11.0.11+9-0ubuntu1 => 11.0.11+9-0ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)09:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [source] (hirsute-proposed) [11.0.11+9-0ubuntu2]09:12
sil2100xnox: hey, ok, so I got impatient waiting for the u-boot stuff getting published and just ran livefs builds using the bileto PPA09:20
sil2100(since the image builds take 2 hours, so the earlier they start building the better)09:20
sil2100Sorry!09:21
xnoxcool09:43
xnoxsil2100:  we will have to rebuild those again anyway, but works for me.09:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.8-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 15.2.11-0ubuntu0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)09:45
sil2100Yeah, once we migrate this to release, which is fine09:45
sil2100It's so slooow09:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (groovy-proposed/main) [15.2.8-0ubuntu0.20.10.1 => 15.2.11-0ubuntu0.20.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)09:46
waveformxnox, sorry - just noticed your ping above - on the next release I am indeed hoping to drop u-boot-rpi from inclusion in the images but for that I'll need to migrate any existing config still using it (which involves certain ... complexities)09:48
jamespagehi release team - I have a new point release for Ceph to address a security issue - however given the exceptionally long time taken to build ceph on some architectures I'm proposing this fast follows hirsute release rather than holding anything up09:49
jamespagehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/192532209:49
ubot3Launchpad bug 1925322 in ceph (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] ceph 16.2.1" [Undecided, New]09:49
jamespageand please could someone reject the ceph 15.2.10 uploads from the focal and groovy UNAPPROVED queues - superceeded by the 15.2.11 ones which include the fixes for this CVE09:51
waveformxnox, but you are correct that for hirsute it's theoretically still needed for upgraders from original focal installs (assuming people haven't manually switched away)09:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (focal-proposed) [15.2.10-0ubuntu0.20.04.1]09:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (groovy-proposed) [15.2.10-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]09:53
dokojamespage: ^^^09:53
xnoxwaveform:  removing it from new images; will keep it installed for those who already had it. It's just we must continue building it and testing that it still works. Or like upgrade them to pibootctl somehow.10:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-8 (hirsute-proposed/universe) [8u282-b08-0ubuntu1 => 8u292-b10-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)10:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-8 [source] (hirsute-proposed) [8u292-b10-0ubuntu1]10:45
xnoxsil2100: i don't think the builds for u-boot are correct.10:56
xnoxsil2100:  instead of building in a given archive, i thought we need to build with EXTRA_PPAS=ci-train-ppa-server/....10:57
xnoxsil2100:  cause it's simply livefs host that is using the ppa, not the image......10:57
xnoxhttps://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/hirsute/cpc/+build/27192910:57
xnoxi can take last daily images, and simply upgrade u-boot-menu inside them.10:58
xnoxrepack, upload to people.canonical.com and try to deploy in the lab.10:58
Laneyright, you need extra_ppas metadata for the things to be used inside the build rather than just the build tools themselves11:00
Laneyhttps://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/ubuntu-cdimage/mainline/view/head:/lib/cdimage/livefs.py#L23111:00
sil2100_eh, great11:22
sil2100_xnox: so normally I'd add extra_ppas, but last time I tried that it didn't work an the builds were failing as there was some bug with support of the extra_ppas metadata11:23
sil2100_Ok then, I'll simply kick a set of -proposed images in that case11:24
xnoxfun fun fun11:24
sil2100_WOuld be nice to know if extra_ppas is working now or not11:24
xnoxit does work now.11:25
=== sil2100_ is now known as sil2100
xnoxbut i also want to add a new option "extra_ppas":"from-host" => aka copy all the sources from the host11:26
sil2100You sure sure? If yes, then maybe re-starting those with extra_ppas instead? Or maybe you don't care about pulling other packages from -proposed?11:26
xnoxsil2100:  cause i.e. these days livefs build injects the archive and all of its deps.11:26
xnoxsil2100:  proposed sounds better.11:26
xnoxppa will be gone, and image will become toast.11:26
sil2100We'll still have to rebuild for release as we can't publish -proposed based images - we need to remember about that11:27
sil2100Ok, running those two subarches11:27
* ogra hands xnox some nutella ... just in case ... 11:31
sil2100Anyway, sorry about that, this will delay everything now because of me having wrong assumptions - again11:43
sil2100So angry at myself right now, grr11:48
xnoxsil2100:  it's ok. Also i now have better fixes for u-boot. Actually fix the crash in question properly. Submitted upstream, but pending their upstream mailing list moderation.11:51
xnoxhttps://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/71/files => but i think that's best for post-hirsute now, cause also need a cherrypick from upstream for another feature for things to work correctly.11:51
ubot3Pull 71 in u-boot/u-boot "cmd: pxe_utils: sysboot: fix crash if either board or soc are not set." [Open]11:51
sil2100Ok, confirmed that in hirsute indeed extra_ppas work again, no weird errors anymore, eh, sigh12:11
rbalintsil2100, xnox could you please add this or something simiar to release notes about LP: #1916485 https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/Jm5HfWsFSM/12:17
ubot3Launchpad bug 1916485 in docker.io (Ubuntu Hirsute) "test -x fails inside shell scripts in containers" [Critical, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191648512:17
sil2100rbalint: sure12:19
sil2100I'll add it to known issues12:20
sil2100Done12:22
sil2100patviafore: hey! Regarding LP: #1919177 - I think this late in the RC cycle I think adding it to known issues is the right way to go12:23
ubot3Launchpad bug 1919177 in cloud-init "Azure: issues with accelerated networking on Hirsute" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/191917712:23
sil2100patviafore: do you have access to the release notes to add info about it?12:23
rbalintsil2100, thanks!12:27
coreycbhello release team, by any chance could we get heat-dashboard accepted into hirsute for openstack?12:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.44]13:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.43 => 1:18.04.44] (core)13:36
patviaforesil2100: people on CPC do, so I'll get them to add it today13:41
patviaforesil2100: are there any known respins coming down the pipe (we have cloud images built on 20210420, and are ready to rebuild at any time)13:45
sil2100patviafore: yes, we will be re-spinning at least the riscv images, pi images and subiquity13:46
patviaforeokay sounds good, just ping me when, and I'll kick off a build shortly after13:54
sil2100Thanks! Will do o/13:55
bdmurraysil2100: Could you review ubuntu-release-upgrader for Bionic?13:58
bdmurraysil2100: its for bug 192229714:08
ubot3Bug 1922297 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Groovy) "20.10 to 21.04: snap does not upgrade channel" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192229714:08
sil2100Will do o/14:17
bdmurrayjuliank: With phased updates for Hirsute if you are installing from the ISO and choose to download updates will the phased-update-percentage be respected?14:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwacom (focal-proposed/main) [1.3-2ubuntu2 => 1.3-2ubuntu3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)14:25
juliankbdmurray: should be, yes14:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (bionic-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~18.04.0 => 20210414.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0] (no packageset)14:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (xenial-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20210414.00-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)14:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (focal-proposed/universe) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~20.04.0 => 20210414.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0] (no packageset)14:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-guest-agent (groovy-proposed/main) [20201217.02-0ubuntu1~20.10.0 => 20210414.00-0ubuntu1~20.10.0] (no packageset)14:50
xnoxLaney:  i went with this emoji RISC-V :five:14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.44]14:54
xnoxfor risc-v, to make it riscv FIVE not riscv VEE14:54
Laneylike sputnik v?14:55
bdmurrayxnox: your release note regarding u-boot-qemu from hirsute is relevant if you are running focal and want to try the risc-v images with qemu on it?14:56
xnoxbdmurray:  yes.15:07
xnoxLaney:  hahahha yes15:07
bdmurrayxnox: should u-boot-qemu be SRU'ed then?15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421)15:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421)15:09
xnoxbdmurray:  yes, however, i have better version of the patches for u-boot-qemu which are upstreamable & submitted upstream too.15:13
Laneyxnox: you testing these new images?15:14
xnoxbdmurray:  https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+git/u-boot/+merge/40154515:14
xnoxLaney:  just got off team calls, yes, will do in a second.15:14
Laneygood15:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (xenial-proposed/main) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 3.9.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)15:38
=== _hc[m] is now known as _hc
xnoxsil2100:  Laney: unleashed & unmatched proposed images work fine on unmatched hw and in qemu16:16
xnoxunleashed image on unleashed not tested yet.16:16
sil2100\o/16:19
Laney|O|16:20
waveformnice :)16:20
LaneyI unblocked that16:21
Laneywe'll have to do respins of those + raspi16:21
Laneysoonnnnnnnnn16:21
xnoxsil2100:  so i think unmatched is good, but unleashed will not be on baremetal.16:51
xnoxsil2100: bdmurray: in the lab it is booting with SOC set to NULL.16:52
xnoxbecause of all the patches that are unapplied.... which includes the hunk that sets fdtfile.16:52
xnoxwhich unleashed now needs again.16:52
xnoxleh sigh.16:54
Laney...16:57
bdmurrayxnox: so I should stop trying to test it?16:57
sil2100I KNEW IT THAT THE UNAPPLY WAS SHADY!17:09
sil2100(still accepted it though)17:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (hirsute-proposed/main) [2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu8 => 2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu9] (core)17:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu9]17:19
ginggswould someone please review https://code.launchpad.net/~ginggs/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/401145 ?17:52
Laney👍18:10
ginggsLaney: thanks!18:37
coreycbbdmurray: by any chance could we get heat-dashboard accepted into hirsute or should we wait and SRU that?18:56
=== mhcerri is now known as mhcerri__
ginggsalso please review https://code.launchpad.net/~ginggs/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/40156519:04
bdmurraycoreycb: I'll have a look19:05
bdmurrayginggs: I'm looking at that now19:06
ginggsbdmurray: thanks!19:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [source] (groovy-proposed) [20210414.00-0ubuntu1~20.10.0]19:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [source] (focal-proposed) [20210414.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0]19:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [source] (bionic-proposed) [20210414.00-0ubuntu1~18.04.0]19:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [source] (xenial-proposed) [20210414.00-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]19:43
xnoxwhy no publisher run?20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat-dashboard [source] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.0-0ubuntu1]20:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted recordmydesktop [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [0.4.0-1]20:21
bdmurrayginggs: I'm rerunning the tests for q2-feature-classifier20:24
cjwatsonxnox: ?20:27
cjwatsonIt seems to be running normally20:28
vorlonxnox: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+publishinghistory shows u-boot published?20:28
coreycbbdmurray: thank you20:42
Trevinhomh, not sure if this may affect other applications TBH, various are using gjs a part the shell, but not sure if it's critical https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gjs/+bug/192326720:47
ubot3Launchpad bug 1923267 in gjs (Ubuntu) "indicator-multiload app broken after upgrading libglib2.0-0 2.67.5-2 to 2.68.0-1" [High, In Progress]20:47
vorlonxnox, cjwatson: ah - claims to have been published an hour ago but not visible in the archive frontend afaics20:49
vorlonand the index hasn't updated yet on anonster20:50
vorlonoh wait, no, I'm looking at the wrong thing20:51
vorlon8 is in release, 9 is in proposed - and yes these are visible from archive.u.c20:51
vorlonxnox: ^^ so yes the publisher has run20:51
xnoxvorlon:  so i think at 21.04 i did not see that britney is in progress. hence update_excuses was still at like 18:00 timestamp. Now it's at 20:19 timestamp. but still missing armhf build.21:06
vorlonxnox: ack21:07
xnoxwas hoping that u-boot ...9 would have migrated by now.21:07
vorlonsorry21:07
=== ogra_ is now known as Guest66031
=== ogra_ is now known as Guest75940
sil2100vorlon, bdmurray: I see u-boot is migrating o/22:41
bdmurraysil2100: vorlon indicated he'd do the respins22:41
sil2100vorlon: bdmurray mentioned you'll do the respins, right?22:42
sil2100Okay, so we'll need to respin the pi images (with pi desktop as well I think), riscv images *and* subiquity (since we wanted to pull in the neat versionned subiquity anyway)22:42
bdmurrayxnox: should u-boot-qemu be SRU'ed then?http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hirsute-proposed/main/dist-upgrader-all/current/DevelReleaseAnnouncement.html22:43
bdmurraywhoops mouse up22:43
bdmurraysil2100: after some discussion I'll be uploading a new u-r-u with a big fat warning in DevelReleaseAnnouncement - http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hirsute-proposed/main/dist-upgrader-all/current/DevelReleaseAnnouncement.html22:43
vorlonsil2100: yes I will do respins.  So you do want respins of subiquity images?  I wasn't clear on that23:05
vorlonsil2100: took me by surprise that there was a skiptest hint already for u-boot or I would've been paying attention sooner, sorry23:05
bdmurrayvorlon: I've uploaded u-r-u23:09
vorlonok23:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:21.04.10 => 1:21.04.11] (core)23:09
vorlonrespins running23:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:21.04.11]23:14
sil2100bdmurray: ok23:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gjs (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.67.2-2ubuntu1 => 1.67.2-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core, desktop-extra, i386-whitelist, mozilla)23:36
sil2100vorlon: yeah, we planned doing those earlier23:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!