| xnox | will check how things are, i guess toolchainy things need to be pinned from the toolchain-r repository higher than the rebuild archive, or the fallback archive. | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| xnox | however it sounds odd that it has no installation candidate | 00:01 |
| tjaalton | Eickmeyer: sometimes, why? | 03:54 |
| Eickmeyer | tjaalton: Got a kernel issue involving framebuffers that has your name written all over it. Really, the email thread. Tested a patch that works perfectly on our OEM hardware. | 03:55 |
| tjaalton | ehich thread? | 04:03 |
| Eickmeyer | tjaalton: Apparently a gitlab issue for intel: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/272 | 04:15 |
| * Eickmeyer had to look at his ticketing system | 04:15 | |
| Eickmeyer | tjaalton: So, basically, there's tons of screen flickering on some of our hardware that the patch in question fixes. | 04:16 |
| Eickmeyer | And it's only if a certain display panel is used. | 04:16 |
| Eickmeyer | But, we can confirm that the patch fixes the problem 100%. | 04:16 |
| tjaalton | oh that, it's upstream now | 04:32 |
| Eickmeyer | tjaalton: Weird, because we're seeing the problem in 20.04, even tested Hirsute. | 04:37 |
| tjaalton | i meant intel drm tree | 04:47 |
| tjaalton | branch | 04:47 |
| Eickmeyer | Oh, so it just hasn't been merged into the kernel yet? | 04:57 |
| tjaalton | I don't think it was sent to stable@, so no | 05:39 |
| tjaalton | should be in 5.13 eventually | 05:39 |
| tjaalton | the commit was pushed yesterday, so it's quite fresh | 05:44 |
| === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g | ||
| xnox | juliank: in base tarball of hirsute, i see gpgv output | 11:35 |
| xnox | is that normal? | 11:35 |
| xnox | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/tDgnFcWqHD/ | 11:35 |
| xnox | should i open a bug about it? | 11:35 |
| juliank | xnox: Haven't seen that before, seems like a minor bug somewhere | 11:37 |
| juliank | xnox: do you see it outside riscv64 too? | 11:37 |
| xnox | juliank: yes, same on s390x | 11:40 |
| xnox | it's this test case http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/423/builds/229833/testcases/1318/results | 11:40 |
| xnox | juliank: which should be the same on all arches. Shall I open a bug about it? | 11:41 |
| xnox | oh | 11:41 |
| xnox | oh | 11:41 |
| juliank | oh? | 11:41 |
| xnox | i think /dev/pts is not mounted? | 11:41 |
| juliank | oh! | 11:41 |
| xnox | let me mount that | 11:41 |
| xnox | ok /dev is not mounted | 11:42 |
| xnox | the test case should be updated. | 11:42 |
| xnox | with /dev mounted it is fine. | 11:42 |
| juliank | ay! | 11:45 |
| === zyga_ is now known as zyga | ||
| === jchittum_ is now known as jchittum | ||
| TomyWork | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1923670 I can confirm that this issue slipped into bionic now as well, as of linux-modules-5.4.0-72-generic_5.4.0-72.80~18.04.1_amd64. I reverted and rebuilt cifs.ko locally, and I can now use DFS again. | 16:28 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1923670 in linux-oem-5.10 (Ubuntu) "CIFS DFS entries not accessible with 5.4.0-71.74-generic" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 16:28 |
| TomyWork | I hope this is the right place for this, since I'm not asking for support (my issue is solved) but reporting/confirming an issue | 16:32 |
| TomyWork | s/an issue/a bug/ | 16:33 |
| === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Closed | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Trusty-Groovy | If you can't send messages here, authenticate to NickServ first | Patch Pilots: | ||
| === popey8 is now known as popey | ||
| === tomreyn_ is now known as tomreyn | ||
| === Unit193 changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Closed | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Trusty-Hirsute | If you can't send messages here, authenticate to NickServ first | Patch Pilots: | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!