| sil2100 | o/ | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421) | 00:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421) | 01:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421) | 01:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421) | 01:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421) | 01:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421.1) | 01:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421.1) | 01:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421.1) | 01:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Hirsute Final] has been updated (20210421.1) | 01:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mosquitto (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.10-3 => 2.0.10-4] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaml-cpp (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.6.3-9ubuntu1 => 0.6.3-10] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 06:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mosquitto [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.10-4] | 06:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm (hirsute-proposed/primary) [1.4.1-0ubuntu4] | 06:38 | |
| philroche | Morning all. I see chatter above about respins. Are they the respins to address the riscv64 issues? If so am I safe to kick off cloud image respins now? | 07:17 |
| philroche | sil2100: ^ | 07:19 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 07:21 |
| sil2100 | Hello! | 07:21 |
| sil2100 | philroche: what's up? I think we have our final images now o/ | 07:21 |
| philroche | > I see chatter above about respins. Are they the respins to address the riscv64 issues? If so am I safe to kick off cloud image respins now? | 07:21 |
| sil2100 | Yes, I think it's all safe now from what I'm aware | 07:22 |
| philroche | Great. Kicking off now | 07:22 |
| sil2100 | Thank you! | 07:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libwacom [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3-2ubuntu3] | 07:25 | |
| philroche | Cloud image base build with serial 20210422 now in progress. We do not have riscv64 Minimal images so that serial remains 20210420 | 07:28 |
| sil2100 | ACK o/ | 07:28 |
| sil2100 | Final block-all block put in place just now, images pre-published o/ | 07:32 |
| sil2100 | Building source isos in the background | 07:32 |
| ginggs | q2-feature-classifier was recently (11hrs ago) added to big_packages, but i'm not seeing --flavor m1.large in the retried autopkgtest logs. is there a delay before the new config is applied? | 07:33 |
| * sil2100 goes AFK for a bit | 07:54 | |
| sil2100 | ginggs: I deployed your changes in production on both 'workers' yesterday so I'd expect it to work | 07:54 |
| sil2100 | AH | 07:55 |
| sil2100 | eeek | 07:55 |
| sil2100 | Ok, I think I know what I missed | 07:55 |
| sil2100 | ginggs: ok, now it should be good, sorry about it | 07:56 |
| ginggs | sil2100: thanks! | 07:56 |
| sil2100 | Now, back to AFK for a bit o/ | 07:56 |
| ginggs | enjoy! | 07:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 08:08 | |
| === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 08:33 | |
| doko | what's the procedure for packages now in -proposed and not reaching the release pocket, but with destination hirsute-updates? re-upload with series -proposed? | 08:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdrm (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.4.104-1build1 => 2.4.105-1ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) | 08:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 08:44 | |
| Laney | doko: when we initialise the next series we can leave things in -proposed if they should be handled by the sru team | 08:44 |
| Laney | (but they probably want to see bugs attached) | 08:44 |
| doko | ok, I'll ask the SRU team before re-uploading | 08:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 08:57 | |
| GunnarHj | Hi sil2100! Please see https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubiquity-slideshow/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/html/revision/896 | 09:01 |
| GunnarHj | Last update was 2+ years ago! | 09:01 |
| GunnarHj | I think there should be a secion "Release minus 28 days" (DocumentationStringFreeze) on the ReleaseProcess page with an item to check that the translation templates in ubiquity and ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (maybe others too) are up to date. | 09:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: openjdk-16 (focal-proposed/primary) [16.0.1+9-1~20.04] | 09:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: openjdk-16 (groovy-proposed/primary) [16.0.1+9-1~20.10] | 09:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected openjdk-16 [sync] (focal-proposed) [16+36-3~20.04] | 09:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-16 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [16+36-3~20.10] | 09:12 | |
| doko | ugh, I meant to reject the groovy one: ^^^ removing it | 09:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 09:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 09:55 | |
| sil2100 | waveform: hey! Can you do a quick spin of the raspi desktop images just-in-case? | 10:08 |
| xnox | bdmurray: i am not sure if that's the right formatting, but proposing riscv64 manual tests https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-manual-tests/+git/ubuntu-manual-tests/+merge/401604 | 10:11 |
| RikMills | sil2100: we have nextcloud-desktop client segfaulting on startup. seems from a quick PPA build and some upstream issues that building without LTO fixes that | 10:12 |
| RikMills | how are we handling such things SRU'wise today? | 10:13 |
| RikMills | LP: #1923053 | 10:13 |
| waveform | @sil2100 absolutely! | 10:13 |
| ubot3 | Launchpad bug 1923053 in nextcloud-desktop (Ubuntu) "nextcloud crashed with SIGSEGV." [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1923053 | 10:13 |
| doko | please unblock openjdk-8/8u292-b10-0ubuntu1, recent security release | 10:15 |
| ginggs | sil2100: whatever you did worked :) q2-feature-classifier passed now | 10:17 |
| Laney | RikMills: SRUing | 10:19 |
| xnox | sil2100: ^^^^^ | 10:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mosquitto (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.10-4 => 2.0.10-4ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:33 | |
| mdeslaur | What happened to xenial autopkgtests? | 10:33 |
| juliank | mdeslaur: what issue are you seeing? | 10:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mosquitto [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.10-4ubuntu1] | 10:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-hwe [source] (hirsute-proposed) [6.1.20-dfsg-1ubuntu1.21.04.1] | 10:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [6.1.20-dfsg-1] | 10:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yaml-cpp [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [0.6.3-10] | 10:45 | |
| Laney | cpaelzer: hey can you expand a bit on the 0-dayness for libvirt/qemu, why they should be 0 day and not regular srus? | 10:49 |
| Laney | just lacking the context and it's not clear to me from the bug, sorry probably my comprehension failing | 10:49 |
| cpaelzer | hiho Laney | 10:49 |
| Laney | heya | 10:49 |
| cpaelzer | yeah in this case it is hard to differentiate - let me try to make clear and you ask on whatever is left | 10:50 |
| cpaelzer | those SRUs and bugs go on for a while already, the reporters are two very awesome and active examples of our community | 10:50 |
| cpaelzer | furthermore the code is - by now - well tested in various environments and such | 10:50 |
| cpaelzer | I'm NOT insisting on this being a 0-day SRU - instead all I wanted to avoid (and sorry if that was misleading) was to "1. open II release 2. the usual initial archive frenzy breaking things, 3. then re-veryfying everything again 4. then SRU" | 10:51 |
| cpaelzer | so all I'm after is the delay, not so much if it is available at 21.04 release or later | 10:52 |
| cpaelzer | if it is "in" before the archive copy/opening and of II happens that is fine for me | 10:52 |
| doko | gaughen_: it's too early for the release party ;p | 10:52 |
| cpaelzer | and even that | 10:52 |
| cpaelzer | if you have reasonable reasons against that "all that it costs" is delay (for hte users) and extra work (for retetsts and rebases) for me - it isn't "breaking the case" | 10:53 |
| cpaelzer | Laney: does that make any sense to your release-focussed eyes? | 10:53 |
| cpaelzer | It also is a bit about the implications "even the new 21.04 doesn't support the latest EPYC-Milan chips" sounds not so nice - but with these fixes we do :-) | 10:54 |
| cpaelzer | but I didn't want to bring that to the SRU-template as this is probably too non-technical | 10:54 |
| cpaelzer | and the upstream changes came in late (in relation to the chip availability) - we were not stalling on this in any way :-) | 10:55 |
| mdeslaur | juliank: I don't see xenial listed in our PPA autopkgtests anymore: https://people.canonical.com/~platform/security-britney/current/ | 10:57 |
| juliank | mdeslaur: oh that's a question for sil2100, I don't do security autopkgtest | 10:57 |
| mdeslaur | sil2100: ^? | 10:57 |
| sil2100 | Oh? | 10:59 |
| sil2100 | Oh | 10:59 |
| sil2100 | I think distro-info-data is at fault here | 11:00 |
| sil2100 | Let me hack that in | 11:00 |
| mdeslaur | oh cool, thanks sil2100 | 11:00 |
| sil2100 | (since `distro-info --supported` now does no longer include xenial...) | 11:00 |
| mdeslaur | yeah, makes sense | 11:01 |
| * mdeslaur cries at having to support xenial for a few years still | 11:02 | |
| sil2100 | Ok, next run should have xenial back! | 11:03 |
| mdeslaur | thanks sil2100! much appreciated! | 11:04 |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: hey! re: the qemu and libvirt SRUs - I'd like to take them in as regular SRUs but without the 7-day aging period - would that sound okay? | 11:07 |
| sil2100 | mdeslaur: yw! | 11:07 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: yeah that would work fine for me | 11:17 |
| cpaelzer | sil2100: are the version numbers ok then, or would you want the very same upload but with ubuntuX.Y versions ? | 11:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 11:23 | |
| sil2100 | cpaelzer: they're fine, this will be forward-copied to HH+1 | 11:35 |
| cpaelzer | perfect sil2100, that is exactly what I wanted then | 11:39 |
| cpaelzer | least amount of trouble for you, but before the HH+1 opening hiccup | 11:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 11:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 11:41 | |
| kanashiro | sil2100, a couple of days ago you accepted the golang-github-containerd-containerd-dev binary package from the Bionic and Focal NEW queue. I just checked and it did not land in -updates yet. Is there any action needed to make it land? | 11:49 |
| === jchittum_ is now known as jchittum | ||
| sil2100 | kanashiro: hey! It didn't? What do you mean? | 12:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 12:19 | |
| kanashiro | sil2100, I can't install it in a regular lxd container running Focal and Bionic | 12:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (bionic-proposed/main) [0.37ubuntu0.9 => 0.37ubuntu0.10] (core) | 12:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (groovy-proposed/main) [0.44ubuntu1.3 => 0.44ubuntu1.4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 12:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (focal-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1.4 => 0.43ubuntu1.5] (core, i386-whitelist) | 12:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.46 => 0.46ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 12:30 | |
| sil2100 | kanashiro: interesting! | 12:30 |
| kanashiro | sil2100, indeed! I was wondering if an AA would need to perform any extra action | 12:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.46ubuntu1] | 12:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:3.38.2-1ubuntu2] | 12:34 | |
| sil2100 | kanashiro: I'll look into that in a moment after I'm done with release-related tasks, but one thing I'm suspecting is that the binaries didn't get copied from -proposed to -updates as the -proposed binaries maybe were not approved before the copy was made? | 12:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-libinput [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.30.0-1ubuntu1] | 12:37 | |
| sil2100 | I mean, I think there might have been an ordering issue, with the NEW binaries approved too late | 12:37 |
| sil2100 | Or something | 12:37 |
| sil2100 | I'll figure it out | 12:37 |
| kanashiro | sil2100, ah okay, I think you are right. The SRU was accepted before I asked you to check out the NEW queue | 12:39 |
| kanashiro | sil2100, anyway, thanks! | 12:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.44ubuntu1.4] | 12:50 | |
| sil2100 | Laney: eeek, actually there's a 'typo' in the changelogs! | 12:55 |
| sil2100 | Let me fix those, too bad I only now noticed | 12:55 |
| sil2100 | No biggie | 12:55 |
| * ogra waits for "respining all images for fixed comma in changelog" 😄 | 12:56 | |
| rbalint | sil2100, could you please accept google-guest-agent for Hirsute to let CPC start the normal SRU verification? | 13:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (focal-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1.4 => 0.43ubuntu1.5] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:01 | |
| sil2100 | Will do in a moment o/ | 13:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.46ubuntu1 => 0.46ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (bionic-proposed/main) [0.37ubuntu0.9 => 0.37ubuntu0.10] (core) | 13:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.37ubuntu0.10] | 13:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (focal-proposed) [0.43ubuntu1.5] | 13:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.37ubuntu0.10] | 13:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (groovy-proposed/main) [0.44ubuntu1.3 => 0.44ubuntu1.5] (core, i386-whitelist) | 13:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.46ubuntu2] | 13:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.44ubuntu1.5] | 13:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.102-0ubuntu3] | 13:22 | |
| ddstreet | Laney since distro-info --devel is broken starting today until that upload is released ^, is it going to get fast-tracked to sru -updates for all releases? | 13:27 |
| sil2100 | Yes | 13:31 |
| sil2100 | We always fast-track it, no aging, just verification and release | 13:31 |
| ddstreet | sil2100 cool...maybe would be good to release it the day before distro-info breaks next time :) | 13:32 |
| sil2100 | We'd need a name for that to happen ;) | 13:33 |
| sil2100 | We're still lucky we got it as early as today! | 13:34 |
| ddstreet | ouch, well maybe a redesign of distro-info should happen so it doesn't break each release day(s) | 13:35 |
| ddstreet | no update for distro-info in x? | 13:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (hirsute-proposed) [21.1-19-gbad84ad4-0ubuntu3] | 13:38 | |
| sil2100 | It's not accepted yet, but in the queue o/ | 13:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.17] | 13:41 | |
| ddstreet | sil2100 should i verify the bug so you can release? the distro-info breakage is actually stopping some of my work because my tooling uses it | 13:41 |
| sil2100 | plars, waveform: hey! You think we can mark rpi desktop as green? | 13:42 |
| ddstreet | not sure if someone else was currently verifying distro-info bug | 13:42 |
| sil2100 | ddstreet: sure, verification will always help! | 13:42 |
| plars | sil2100: I've mostly been focused on server, I know that bdmurray did some testing on it. I can spin it up on my 400 real quick if you want | 13:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 13:43 | |
| sil2100 | plars: I don't want to distract you from server, that's fine - I see it's green on the isotracker so I guess I can mark it 'ready' | 13:44 |
| sil2100 | Just will wait for a final just-in-case confirmation from waveform :) | 13:44 |
| juliank | sil2100: Please carefully check that software-properties is not broken by new distro-info-data; python-apt now gets fed releases from there and stuff might be broken | 13:45 |
| juliank | hirsute we need to be a bit more cautious as it's the first time python-apt uses distro-info-data | 13:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat-dashboard (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 5.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack) | 13:47 | |
| juliank | Not that hirsute users will start to get impish sources.list updates when they add -proposed or disable -updates and reenable it | 13:48 |
| sil2100 | juliank: but that's for hirsute, right? | 13:49 |
| juliank | sil2100: right | 13:50 |
| juliank | sil2100: I'm adding a bug comment | 13:50 |
| xnox | ddstreet: it's normal that distro-info does nto work on release days. | 13:50 |
| xnox | ddstreet: even if we have dates ahead of time, i think it's not that good on release days either. | 13:50 |
| xnox | cause next release is not open yet, and lots of things from next release are not there. Nor are stable things in stable. | 13:51 |
| ddstreet | that's not very good | 13:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 13:52 | |
| juliank | ooh nice, dpkg 1.20.9 made it into release pocket | 13:53 |
| juliank | This is *good* | 13:53 |
| juliank | apt 2.3.0 in impish requires dpkg >= 1.20.8 | 13:53 |
| juliank | well, 2.3.2 it will be | 13:53 |
| bittin | is impish 21.10 ? | 13:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-guest-agent [source] (hirsute-proposed) [20210414.00-0ubuntu1] | 14:06 | |
| bdmurray | bittin: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/534867266/distro-info-data_0.46_0.46ubuntu1.diff.gz | 14:07 |
| bittin | ubottu: bdmurray: ah cool thanks | 14:08 |
| ddstreet | sil2100 lp:#1925484 verified for x/b/f/g feel free to release plz | 14:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 14:15 | |
| juliank | ddstreet, sil2100 verified hirsute too | 14:18 |
| juliank | including software-properties-gtk toggling | 14:18 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 14:23 |
| slyon | Congrats! o/ | 14:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 14:23 | |
| sil2100 | Not yet released tho! | 14:24 |
| sil2100 | (almost there) | 14:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nextcloud-desktop (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.1.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.1.1-1ubuntu1.1] (no packageset) | 14:25 | |
| juliank | sil2100: well at least the releae announcement on ubuntu.com is out :D | 14:29 |
| RikMills | I also saw that tweeted by Planet Ubuntu | 14:33 |
| Eickmeyer | Lots of line jumping on release day. | 14:34 |
| Laney | itchy fingers | 14:39 |
| ogra | tappy feet | 14:52 |
| tumbleweed | Laney: thanks for doing the distro-infos | 14:53 |
| Laney | np | 14:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 14:54 | |
| Laney | tumbleweed: I was going to ping you to fwd it | 14:54 |
| Laney | probably too lazy to do a MR :P | 14:55 |
| tumbleweed | Laney: already done :) | 14:55 |
| Laney | nice | 14:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-13 (groovy-proposed/universe) [13.0.4+8-1 => 13.0.7+5-0ubuntu1~20.10] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-13 (focal-proposed/universe) [13.0.4+8-1~20.04 => 13.0.7+5-0ubuntu1~20.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-15 (groovy-proposed/universe) [15+36-1 => 15.0.3+3-1~20.10] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 15:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 15:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Hirsute Final] has been marked as ready | 15:11 | |
| rbalint | ubuntu-archive could you please promote libzstd in xenial to main? it blocks dpkg | 15:25 |
| philroche | sil2100: CPC is ready for launch :) | 15:40 |
| doko | rbalint: did you talk with the security team? sarnold, sbeattie? | 15:41 |
| rbalint | doko, no, let me extend the MIR bug | 15:44 |
| rbalint | doko, also contacted the security team internally, too LP: #1755310 | 15:48 |
| ubot3 | Launchpad bug 1755310 in libzstd (Ubuntu Xenial) "MIR libzstd" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1755310 | 15:48 |
| doko | rbalint: just want to make them aware of that | 15:51 |
| sil2100 | philroche: \o/ | 15:54 |
| sil2100 | philroche: I think you can go live now! Since we are just validating the published images | 15:54 |
| philroche | sil2100: ack. CPC will now begin promotion to release of 20210420 serial for Minimal images and 20210422 serial for Base images | 15:55 |
| sbeattie | rbalint: sorry, what is the context here? | 15:57 |
| rbalint | sbeattie, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libzstd/+bug/1755310/comments/3 | 15:59 |
| ubot3 | Launchpad bug 1755310 in libzstd (Ubuntu Xenial) "MIR libzstd" [Undecided, New] | 15:59 |
| sbeattie | rbalint: that doesn't give me any context as to why this is needed, except that dpkg for some reason has grown a dependency on it. | 16:07 |
| bittin | https://www.mynaparrot.com/en/join?meeting=65EA1A66-8D9B-458A-A9F8-A1BB2271D581 password: hirsute for people that wants to video chat | 16:07 |
| rbalint | sbeattie, ok so the why is that to enable launchpad to publish zstd compressed packages xenial's dpkg needs decompression support because launchpad runs xenial | 16:10 |
| rbalint | sbeattie, also xenial esm users may also maintain package archives where dpkg's zstd decompression may be needed | 16:12 |
| philroche | For our Chinese friends - for the first time ever....aws-cn was the first AWS partition to receive Hirsute release AMIs | 16:17 |
| cjwatson | ESM seems like a pretty niche use case, but having Launchpad use a supported version of dpkg is reasonably important | 16:21 |
| cjwatson | (niche because most of the OS doesn't use zstd compression there. yes, of course one theoretically could) | 16:21 |
| cjwatson | sbeattie: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v9y6OGm5HsxPdGgb9ZrFMz5tEN21fMpdwuL9yIp8bjY | 16:23 |
| cjwatson | (seems to be Canonical-internal, sorry, not my doc) | 16:23 |
| * sbeattie knows how it is | 16:33 | |
| sbeattie | reading now | 16:33 |
| bittin | https://www.twitch.tv/communiteatime | 16:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.9.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.2] | 16:48 | |
| ogra | bittin, please keep it in #ubuntu-release-party ... people do actual work in here | 17:00 |
| sbeattie | rbalint, doko: okay, acked moving libzstd into main for xenial: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libzstd/+bug/1755310/comments/4 | 17:01 |
| ubot3 | Launchpad bug 1755310 in libzstd (Ubuntu Xenial) "MIR libzstd" [Undecided, New] | 17:01 |
| === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 21.04 Hirsute Hippo | Archive: Closed | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | Hirsute Release Coordination | We accept payment in cash, cheque or gin | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you will be missed | ||
| bittin | ogra: alright | 17:06 |
| ogra | 👋/ | 17:06 |
| ogra | yay | 17:06 |
| Laney | smooooooooooooth | 17:14 |
| xnox | sil2100: did you not add emoji in the end? or did it not come through? (cause email headers have to be 7bit clean normally) | 17:14 |
| xnox | the one in the x-ubuntu header | 17:14 |
| Laney | the most elite emoji is an invisible one | 17:18 |
| cjwatson | 7-bit clean> that's what RFC2047 is for | 17:18 |
| bittin | thanks for the release, cya next time :) | 17:18 |
| bittin | and keep up the good work | 17:18 |
| cjwatson | good choice of X-Ubuntu, I thought | 17:19 |
| xnox | cjwatson: oooh nice. | 17:19 |
| xnox | (the rfc, did not know that it exists) | 17:19 |
| xnox | cjwatson: it started with "you will be missed" but then it was deemed not good enough. | 17:21 |
| xnox | cjwatson: and it was mean to be "... missed 🦄" | 17:21 |
| xnox | for me that didn't come through | 17:21 |
| * ogra raises his beer | 17:28 | |
| ogra | to infinity ! | 17:29 |
| mdeslaur | sil2100: I still don't see xenial showing up...how long is it supposed to take? | 17:30 |
| mdeslaur | sil2100: (oh, no rush) | 17:30 |
| === popey8 is now known as popey | ||
| juliank | The torrent does not work | 17:49 |
| juliank | 04/22 19:48:40 [ERROR] GID#708191bcb787e6da - Tracker request https://torrent.ubuntu.com/announce?info_hash=d%A9%80%AB%E6%E4H%22k%B90%BA%06%15%92%E4L7%81%A1&peer_id=A2-1-35-0-%B0iA%D1%2C%3A%FB4%0F%DC&uploaded=0&downloaded=0&left=2809825280&compact=1&key=A%D1%2C%3A%FB4%0F%DC&numwant=50&no_peer_id=1&port=6915&event=started&supportcrypto=1 failed | 17:49 |
| juliank | Exception: [DefaultBtAnnounce.cc:303] errorCode=1 Tracker returned failure reason: Requested download is not authorized for use with this tracker. | 17:49 |
| juliank | Does something need to be setup on the tracker still? | 17:49 |
| dbristow | My torrents are seeding fine. | 17:54 |
| dbristow | I got mine from cdimage.ubuntu.com | 17:54 |
| juliank | dbristow: there's only server on cdimage | 17:54 |
| juliank | talking about the official download for amd64 dekstop: https://releases.ubuntu.com/hirsute/ubuntu-21.04-desktop-amd64.iso.torrent | 17:55 |
| dbristow | juliank: ftp://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/21.04 | 17:55 |
| juliank | I am seeding at 600 kB/s found images via dht | 17:55 |
| dbristow | juliank: My torrents were in that directory | 17:56 |
| juliank | good for you | 17:56 |
| dbristow | "Seeding to 15 of 51 connections" | 17:56 |
| dbristow | connected peers, that is | 17:57 |
| juliank | I have 14 of 41 peers | 17:58 |
| ogra | dbristow, yre you sure you dont seed arm64 ? | 17:58 |
| juliank | but that's all irrelevant | 17:58 |
| ogra | that dir doesnt have amd64 usually | 17:58 |
| juliank | ogra: So, via ftp releases.ubuntu.com offers other stuff than via http | 17:58 |
| dbristow | ogra: Trust me, the amd64 is there | 17:58 |
| juliank | dbristow: it's 2020, don't use ftp | 17:58 |
| dbristow | I'm not talking /cdimage/releases | 17:58 |
| dbristow | juliank: I prefer ftp when it's available, you can see symlinks. | 17:59 |
| juliank | Why do we offer ftp, this is confusing to users | 17:59 |
| ogra | yeah | 17:59 |
| ogra | and the browsers drop support for it | 17:59 |
| ogra | (i actually though firefox did already) | 17:59 |
| juliank | ogra: rsync and ftp /releases/21.04 is different from http | 17:59 |
| juliank | ogra: http has /releases/21.04/release | 17:59 |
| ogra | yes, i know | 18:00 |
| juliank | ogra: and ftp only offers amd64 desktop + server | 18:00 |
| juliank | ogra: So this is super confusing :D | 18:00 |
| ogra | yeah | 18:00 |
| ogra | not sure if ftp is still used for mirroring though... | 18:00 |
| juliank | cdimage.ubuntu.com::releases/ <=> http://releases.ubuntu.com/ | 18:00 |
| juliank | cdimage.ubuntu.com::cdimage/ <=> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ | 18:00 |
| juliank | ? | 18:01 |
| juliank | yup | 18:01 |
| mgedmin | https://ubuntu.com/download/alternative-downloads says the torrent is at https://releases.ubuntu.com/21.04/ubuntu-21.04-desktop-amd64.iso.torrent | 18:02 |
| juliank | yes | 18:02 |
| juliank | we know where the torrent is | 18:03 |
| mgedmin | but I get the same "Requested download is not authorized for use with this tracker" error | 18:03 |
| dbristow | Someone needs to kick the torrent server | 18:04 |
| juliank | dbristow: Working on finding the responsible people :D | 18:06 |
| falcojr | sil2100: cloud-init has an SRU for X, B, F and G per https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1922739 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1899299 . If there is time today to review that SRU, testing is complete | 18:16 |
| ubot3 | Launchpad bug 1922739 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Hirsute) "AttributeError: 'DataSourceNoCloud' object has no attribute 'vendordata2_raw'" [Undecided, Confirmed] | 18:16 |
| ubot3 | Launchpad bug 1899299 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Hirsute) "do-release-upgrade from Trusty to Xenial breaks cloud-init init-local on reboot" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 18:16 |
| bdmurray | falcojr: Has it been 7+ days in -proposed? | 18:17 |
| falcojr | bdmurray: whoops...no it hasn't | 18:18 |
| bdmurray | falcojr: Is it important enough to release early? | 18:28 |
| bdmurray | coreycb: if you want to quickly verify bug 1925501 I'd be happy to release it | 18:35 |
| ubot3 | Bug 1925501 in Ubuntu Cloud Archive wallaby "[SRU] heat-dashboard-common fails to install on hirsute (wallaby)" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1925501 | 18:35 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: oh sure that'd be great. I'll report back. | 18:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted heat-dashboard [source] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.0-0ubuntu2] | 18:36 | |
| falcojr | bdmurray: no, I don't believe so | 18:39 |
| mgedmin | how come https://releases.ubuntu.com/21.04/ shows that SHA256SUMS.gpg has an older timestamp than SHA256SUMS itself? | 18:44 |
| mgedmin | (this explains the BAD signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key (2012) <cdimage@ubuntu.com>" I get from gpgv, I suppose) | 18:44 |
| vorlon | Laney: ^^ this is the second time we've had a bad .gpg for a SHA256SUMS reported after release, you didn't do any manual manipulation of the SHA256SUMS file, did you? | 18:55 |
| vorlon | mgedmin: I've re-signed and it should be mirroring now | 18:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (xenial-proposed/main) [3.168.13 => 3.168.14] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 18:56 | |
| mgedmin | verifies fine now! | 19:01 |
| vorlon | sil2100, Laney: when looking at SHA256SUMS to check if there were any other stale signatures, I noticed the beta milestone images have not yet been archived off. https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/hirsute-hippo-21-04-release-status-tracking/21700/2 says this task is "assigned and being worked on" but the legend here doesn't give any way to see who it's assigned to? :) | 19:04 |
| juliank | vorlon: it also has a checkmark on ":heavy_check_mark: Check torrents for proper functionality." and they don't work correctly - the tracker is rejecting them | 19:05 |
| juliank | what's going on? argh | 19:05 |
| bdmurray | juliank: If you have a better / more specific way to test them could you write it down in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseProcess? | 19:06 |
| juliank | bdmurray: open them in a torrent client and check that they can download? | 19:07 |
| juliank | and don't produce error messages about tracker not working? | 19:07 |
| bdmurray | juliank: they were checked with transmission | 19:08 |
| juliank | bdmurray: that shows the error when clicking on properties->tracker | 19:09 |
| juliank | also tons of delay at start in trying to find pee5rs | 19:09 |
| kc2bez[m] | juliank: I am having the same issue here. | 19:09 |
| juliank | kc2bez[m]: yes, surely, the tracker has not been told about the torrents yet | 19:10 |
| juliank | bdmurray: I added details, but it also seems to miss a step to actually poke the torrent tracker | 19:13 |
| juliank | bdmurray: maybe it (is supposed to) works automatically, I don't know | 19:13 |
| bdmurray | juliank: okay, thanks | 19:14 |
| juliank | can someone commit to following up on that and getting it fixed? I went EOD hours ago really, and I don't know who's in charge of it | 19:15 |
| bdmurray | juliank: vorlon and I will sort it | 19:16 |
| juliank | bdmurray: ack, thanks! | 19:16 |
| cjwatson | My guess is that releases-sync on caranda is broken | 19:24 |
| cjwatson | Since https://torrent.ubuntu.com/simple/hirsute/desktop/ only lists beta | 19:24 |
| cjwatson | It should hopefully leave logs somewhere on caranda where IS can read the,m | 19:25 |
| sil2100 | vorlon: it's on meee | 19:37 |
| sil2100 | I'll finish it up soonish | 19:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwacom (focal-proposed/main) [1.3-2ubuntu2 => 1.3-2ubuntu3] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 19:50 | |
| === tomreyn_ is now known as tomreyn | ||
| Laney | vorlon: No I didn't, if you'd like to add a step in there to verify the checksums though then it'll get done the next time | 20:15 |
| vorlon | Laney: well I'd like to figure out the bug that caused them to be stale | 20:16 |
| vorlon | -rw-rw-r-- 1 cdimage cdimage 198 Apr 22 15:22 SHA256SUMS | 20:17 |
| vorlon | -rw-rw-r-- 2 cdimage cdimage 833 Apr 22 14:44 SHA256SUMS.gpg | 20:17 |
| Laney | Sure, but checking them seems like a sensible thing to do anyway. | 20:18 |
| vorlon | what's particularly curious here is that the 14:44 timestamp is close to the timestamp for all the flavors, but the SHA256SUMS file for Ubuntu was much later | 20:20 |
| vorlon | so who was doing what at 15:22 :) | 20:20 |
| Laney | I mean I don't wanna blame sil2100 but that sure matches the timestamp on the old-releases archival | 20:22 |
| Laney | so I guess verifying would have worked ... | 20:22 |
| vorlon | okj | 20:22 |
| Laney | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/hirsute-hippo-21-04-release-status-tracking/21700 follow up actions | 20:27 |
| Laney | add any others, we'll have a retrospective next week | 20:27 |
| vorlon | torrents fixed now | 20:54 |
| juliank | yay | 20:57 |
| Laney | nice | 20:58 |
| juliank | I've seed 2.1 times :D | 20:59 |
| juliank | *ed | 20:59 |
| Laney | I had a ratio of like 5.4 before I deleted the iso | 20:59 |
| Laney | but only the nice DHT people I guess :p | 21:00 |
| juliank | yeah | 21:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gwenview [source] (hirsute-proposed) [4:20.12.3-1ubuntu0.1] | 21:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tmux (focal-proposed/main) [3.0a-2ubuntu0.2 => 3.0a-2ubuntu0.3] (ubuntu-server) | 21:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:21.04.9] | 21:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (hirsute-proposed) [7.0.0-2ubuntu2] | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu3] | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.67.2-2ubuntu2] | 21:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nextcloud-desktop [source] (hirsute-proposed) [3.1.1-1ubuntu1.1] | 21:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: landscape-client (hirsute-proposed/main) [19.12-0ubuntu9 => 19.12-0ubuntu9.1] (ubuntu-server) | 22:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (hirsute-proposed) [19.12-0ubuntu9.1] | 22:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tmux [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0a-2ubuntu0.3] | 22:30 | |
| sergiodj | bdmurray: thanks for the amazingly quick review & acceptance of the tmux SRU :) | 22:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!