[00:14] <teward> laney and release team: y'all need to update links on the release notes
[00:14] <teward> half of em point to betas
[00:16] <vorlon> teward: corrected
[00:17] <teward> vorlon: thanks.  until you hear backfrom Robie or the Canonical server team we have an empty section that says "Nothing Yet" under 'Ubuntu Server' heading, might be one of those "ummmm... was this a typo?" situation
[00:18] <vorlon> looks like a duplicated section, I'll remove it
[00:19] <teward> perfect thanks vorlon and sorry to make you do work :)
[00:19] <teward> I'd edit myself but i'm lazy so :)
[00:19] <vorlon> funnily enough, my job involves doing work
[00:19] <teward> heheh
[00:21] <teward> well i'm glad I can just put more work on you :P
[00:23] <teward> thanks vorlon :)
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [3.192.1.9 => 3.192.1.10] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[02:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (focal-proposed/main) [3.192.30.6 => 3.192.30.7] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[07:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.0.123ubuntu5 => 1.0.123ubuntu6] (desktop-core)
[07:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (groovy-proposed/main) [1.0.123ubuntu1.1 => 1.0.123ubuntu1.2] (desktop-core)
[07:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (groovy-proposed/main) [6.6.0-1ubuntu3.4 => 6.6.0-1ubuntu3.5] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (groovy-proposed/main) [1:5.0-5ubuntu9.7 => 1:5.0-5ubuntu9.8] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (focal-proposed/main) [1.0.118ubuntu1.3 => 1.0.118ubuntu1.4] (core)
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.8 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.9] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[07:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.95ubuntu0.8 => 1.0.95ubuntu0.9] (core)
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6.15 => 1:4.2-3ubuntu6.16] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (xenial-proposed/main) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.12 => 1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.13] (core)
[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (groovy-proposed) [1:5.0-5ubuntu9.8]
[07:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu6.16]
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.9]
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (groovy-proposed) [6.6.0-1ubuntu3.5]
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (hirsute-proposed/main) [16.2.0-0ubuntu1 => 16.2.1-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-chess (focal-proposed/universe) [1:3.36.0-1 => 1:3.36.2-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra)
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-online-accounts (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.36.1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-nibbles (focal-proposed/universe) [1:3.36.0-1 => 1:3.36.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra)
[11:18] <icey> SRU folks - follow up question about heat-dashboard - there's a point release that's out which contains, basically, the metadata from upstream for the new branch, and one commit (bug fix) - given the topic of SRU exceptions, would you prefer that the commit itself follow the normal SRU process, or would it be OK for me to upload the point releaes?
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polari (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.1-1 => 3.36.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 7755 entries have been added or removed
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (impish-proposed/main) [11ubuntu19 => 11.1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-17 (hirsute-proposed/universe) [17~17-1 => 17~19-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (impish-proposed/main) [0.46ubuntu2 => 0.47] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[12:00] <rbasak> icey: if I understand you correctly, both options are equivalent from an SRU perspective, and I'd leave it to you to decide whatever is easiest for you. Since we only really care about the diff, and not the specific upstream version number, and metadata changes for upstream point releases that we already accept would not be an issue.
[12:01] <rbasak> (interestingly I recall one occasion when a version bump did make something explode because something else was incorrectly testing on it, but that's unlikely to happen in a package where microrelease bumps are common)
[12:01] <icey> rbasak: perfect - it's generally nicer to pull in the upstream point release rather than carrying patches, if possible :)
[12:01] <rbasak> equivalent> actually thinking about it they aren't exactly, since the microrelease option doesn't require the usual SRU documentation. But my answer is still the same - up to you :)
[12:16] <LocutusOfBorg> first sync done :D
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (impish-proposed/main) [0.46ubuntu2 => 0.47] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[12:17] <LocutusOfBorg> sadly they made a typo in changelog
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.47]
[12:22] <doko> first queue reject done :D
[12:23] <LocutusOfBorg> lol :D
[12:30] <tumbleweed> ah, I copy-pasted the same typo
[12:33] <LocutusOfBorg> :D
[12:53] <cjwatson> So hm, the process of initializing impish appears to have copied packages from hirsute-proposed into impish, which is not obviously desirable: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gjs/+publishinghistory
[12:53] <cjwatson> err that was meant to be https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/DnXpGHsvGV/
[12:53] <cjwatson> but it looks like proposed-migration was incorrectly left enabled?
[12:54] <cjwatson> Somebody in ubuntu-release should probably go through everything in https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/DnXpGHsvGV/ and decide whether it was properly migrated
[12:58] <xnox> Initialised empty Git repository in /home/ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/data/impish-proposed/Hints/.git/
[12:58] <xnox> error: branch 'impish' not found.
[12:58] <xnox> fatal: ambiguous argument 'origin/impish': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
[12:58] <xnox> Laney:  that doesn't look good
[13:00] <xnox> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/impish/2021-04-23/11:25:13.log did not have any hints, and moved all the things.
[13:01] <xnox> Laney: bdmurray: vorlon: please create impish branch in hints repo. it seems that "devel" is not being used?
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsecret (focal-proposed/main) [0.20.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.20.4-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[13:06] <cjwatson> Base images (chroots and LXD images) installed for impish
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwacom [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3-2ubuntu3]
[13:14] <tumbleweed> xnox: I think devel is usually used for development releases, and named branches for stable releases
[13:14] <tumbleweed> the hirsute branch only just got created
[13:15] <xnox> ok, but i guess something else doesn't know that impish should be devel then =/
[13:17] <cjwatson> bootstrap archive adjusted for impish
[13:18] <cjwatson> rbasak: Could you run "mark-suite-dirty -A ubuntu/partner -s impish" please?
[13:20] <cjwatson> I'm also going to branch live filesystems, since I think I have most of the right intersection of permissions for that and it doesn't depend on much else
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.118ubuntu1.4]
[13:25] <Laney> xnox: which something else?
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.123ubuntu1.2]
[13:26] <tjaalton> huh, I can't sru-review hirsute uploads :)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gupnp (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 1.2.4-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[13:28] <Laney> not yet, we didn't get to that step yet
[13:28] <tjaalton> okay
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.13]
[13:30] <rbasak> cjwatson: done
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.95ubuntu0.9]
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-lib [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.2.3.2-1ubuntu3.2]
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-lib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2.1ubuntu2.4]
[13:43] <cjwatson> rbasak: thanks
[13:47] <Laney> Right I'm going to attempt to fix those bad migrations up
[13:47] <Laney> Bulk move everything to proposed, bulk copy everything back to release from hirsute release
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: csh (impish-proposed/universe) [20110502-6 => 20110502-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:54] <xnox> Laney:  britney1 fix for this issue https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/britney/do-not-carry-on-after-git-fail/+merge/401705
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-base [source] (focal-proposed) [4.5ubuntu3.2]
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-base [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.5ubuntu1.3]
[14:12] <Laney> OK potentially undone that damage
[14:12] <Laney> and reordered the checklist to avoid it in future
[14:14] <athos> j
[14:22] <cjwatson> livefses branched
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.0.123ubuntu6]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano-dashboard (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1:11.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:11.0.0-0ubuntu1.1] (openstack)
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: murano-dashboard (impish-proposed/universe) [1:11.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:11.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat-dashboard (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 3.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-17 [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [17~19-1ubuntu1]
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (impish-proposed) [11.1ubuntu1]
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (impish-proposed/main) [1.0.123ubuntu5 => 1.0.123ubuntu6] (desktop-core) (sync)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [sync] (impish-proposed) [1.0.123ubuntu6]
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [sync] (impish-proposed) [0.47]
[16:43] <Laney> cjwatson: packer and gdnsd resurrections are being rejected with "binaries conflicting with the existing ones" - any idea how to convince LP to accept them?
[16:46] <cjwatson> Laney: Ugh.  If you've hit that bug then the only recourse is probably a build1 upload
[16:47] <Laney> Hang on, I got packer to work by --from-suite=focal (where it was first built)
[16:47] <Laney> Same with gdnsd
[16:47] <Laney> Hoorah, sorry - I forgot about that initially
[16:47] <cjwatson> Oh, maybe ... happens when some of the builds failed I think
[16:48] <cjwatson> That's where the first riscv64 build happened for those anyway
[16:48] <Laney> Yeah, not where they were first built, misled by rmadison
[16:48] <Laney> Where the last build record was created or something
[16:49] <cjwatson> Yeah
[16:49] <Laney> That should make compare-archives clean, I think
[16:49]  * Laney sweats
[16:49] <Laney> modulo the things doko has accepted
[17:21] <Laney> rbasak: I'm running the removals now. I found a few more that I think were meant to be SRUs and will leave them in hirsute-proposed. Feel free to get them removed though if they're not.
[17:21] <Laney> rbasak: IOW I think you can do the ACL changes now
[17:24] <Laney> xnox: remind me to review that b1 branch next week if I forget!
[17:25] <rbasak> ack, looking
[17:25] <rbasak> Laney: there are a couple of syncs in NEW. Do those need rejecting?
[17:34] <rbasak> For Unapproved, they would all (of course) then leave Impish with an older version. What's the expectation there? That we'll follow the usual process for Hirsute, but also copy forward to Impish as soon as the binaries are built? Or something else?
[17:44] <bdmurray> rbasak: Are you available to do an SRU review?
[17:49] <rbasak> bdmurray: I'm way beyond EOD now and a little too tired I think, sorry.
[17:49] <bdmurray> rbasak: No problem
[17:51] <rbasak> bdmurray: leave the details here though and I'll try to pick it up when I next can, if not done by then?
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (impish-proposed/universe) [7.5.0-6ubuntu4 => 7.5.0-6ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [source] (impish-proposed) [7.5.0-6ubuntu5]
[20:04] <valorie> thank you release team for a great release!
[20:05] <vorlon> Laney: I got a notification about haskell-hgettext being published to impish release, which I knew was wrong; I see that you've since fixed this; what was the cause? is it somehow related to the missing hints issue xnox brought up?
[20:26] <vorlon> cjwatson, stgraber: how did a commit wind up on snakefruit for ubuntu-archive-tools without going through the main branch?
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added magnum-ui to openstack in hirsute
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-automaton to openstack in hirsute
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added zaqar to openstack in hirsute
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (impish-proposed/universe) [8.4.0-7ubuntu3 => 8.4.0-7ubuntu4] (i386-whitelist)
[20:30] <cjwatson> vorlon: Looked like stgraber committed it directly on snakefruit; I don't know why.  I reviewed and merged it this morning after doko pointed it out
[20:31] <stgraber> cjwatson: what commit was that? I've not even ssh-ed to snakefruit in quite a while :)
[20:31] <cjwatson> stgraber: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/trunk/revision/1470.1.1
[20:32] <stgraber> hmm, I committed that earlier this week from my laptop
[20:32] <cjwatson> I suppose it's also possible somebody uncommitted it from the mainline after it was pulled onto snakefruit.  Not sure, I really don't feel like that degree of archaeology
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [source] (impish-proposed) [8.4.0-7ubuntu4]
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-defaults (impish-proposed/main) [1.190ubuntu1 => 1.190ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:32] <stgraber> I didn't even connect the company VPN this week so couldn't have been done on snakefruit
[20:32] <cjwatson> Your laptop doesn't somehow have a complicated bound branch arrangement?
[20:32] <cjwatson> How odd
[20:33] <cjwatson> I guess it must have been uncommitted from the mainline, but I have no idea why
[20:33] <stgraber> stgraber@castiana:~/data/code/ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools$ cat .bzr/branch/branch.conf
[20:33] <stgraber> parent_location = bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/trunk/
[20:33] <stgraber> push_location = bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/trunk/
[20:33] <cjwatson> Or I suppose maybe doko could have made his changes, encountered some kind of divergence, and done a bzr push --overwrite
[20:33] <cjwatson> Odd that he wouldn't have told us that if so
[20:34] <doko> no, I didn't
[20:34] <cjwatson> All a mystery then
[20:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-defaults [source] (impish-proposed) [1.190ubuntu2]
[20:34] <doko> I only noticed the divergence when trying to update the checkout on snakefruit
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added octavia to openstack in focal
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added magnum-ui to openstack in impish
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-automaton to openstack in impish
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added zaqar to openstack in impish
[21:02] <seb128> stgraber, cjwatson vorlon, sorry that was my fault, I forced pushed changes for a branch I've up for review but forgot that bzr would push to the master location and not the one I used previously :-/ since my checkout was recent enough and there was no newer merges listed on launchpad I just restore what I had, unsure if I could have got the proper state back from bzr?
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (impish-proposed/universe) [9.3.0-23ubuntu2 => 9.3.0-24ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [source] (impish-proposed) [9.3.0-24ubuntu1]
[21:03] <seb128> I should have asked if someone did changes recently, unsure what would be the right place which has proper visibility (IRC isn't great for that, everyone doesn't stick always online not read the backlog if they are not pinged)
[21:04] <seb128> when do we transition that vcs to git btw?
[21:05] <cjwatson> aha!  mystery solved
[21:08] <seb128> speaking of IRC not being great, I'm dropping offline, have a nice weekend. I will read irclog in case someone has extra comments, otherwise there is always emails
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-bluefield [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1011.14] (no packageset)
[22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (impish-proposed/universe) [8.4.0-7ubuntu4 => 8.4.0-7ubuntu5] (i386-whitelist)
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [source] (impish-proposed) [8.4.0-7ubuntu5]
[22:44] <xnox> vorlon:  the hint issue did not help indeed, but also britney was turned off late and it noticed impish before it was ready.
[22:44] <xnox> vorlon:  we thought running britney will be fine, cause the bloack all source hints was in place.... if it was read.
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-bluefield [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1011.14]
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1015.16] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1025.27] (core)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1018.22] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1043.45~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1099.112] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1015.16~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1043.45] (no packageset)
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1039.40] (no packageset)