[09:36] <seb128> xnox, is that on purpose that we don't display ISO check status on the desktop ISO anymore?
[09:41] <xnox> seb128:  on purpose. Everyone complained about it, so it is actually still being run, in the background, and i.e. ubuntu-bug picks it up. And it is copied into /var/log/installer.
[09:42] <xnox> seb128:  we don't have any UI/UX inside ubiquity to say something like "your install might not work, as iso changes got detected" or some such.
[09:43] <seb128> xnox, ah, where did it got disabled?
[09:44] <seb128> I think people didn't like the fact that it was not showing you the result
[09:44] <seb128> they will not like it better than it's not showing it + now it's not telling you while it's sitting on a spinner
[09:47] <xnox> seb128:  nothing sits on a spinner
[09:47] <xnox> seb128:  the check is executed as a systemd job from booted iso. nothing is done in the initrd anymore.
[09:48] <seb128> xnox, it just happens in background still after the session started?
[09:48] <xnox> seb128:  it's a systemd unit that runs in parallel to the rest of the system booting / running.
[09:48] <seb128> I see
[09:48] <xnox> seb128:  see casper
[09:48] <seb128> right, I saw that now
[09:48] <seb128> thanks
[09:49] <xnox> if the spinner takes too long to bring up the live session => it's just IO speed / machine being slow =/
[09:49] <xnox> i'm not sure how we can improve that.
[09:50] <seb128> right
[09:51] <seb128> still a bit sad we are not using the result in ubiquity, hopefully we fix that before the next LTS
[09:53] <xnox> seb128:  apport / ubuntu-bug use it. I never managed to get time for UX design and to implement that in ubiquity. Maybe you can find time to do that?
[09:53] <xnox> or at least do that in the new installer?
[09:53] <xnox> / subiquity => i'm not sure subiquity handles it right either.
[09:54] <seb128> xnox, I opened https://github.com/canonical-web-and-design/desktop-design/issues/157 , which got ignored and now needs to be reassigned because no mpt :-(
[09:54] <seb128> I will nag
[15:29] <sigv> I know most don't care about the Importance flag on merge request bugs, and it's not required or anything --, but could someone please set "Importance: Wishlist" for me on LP: #1926120 so that it doesn't hang around with that "Undecided"?
[15:45] <cjwatson> done
[15:45] <juliank> u 2?
[15:45] <juliank> :D
[17:18] <sigv> Thank you!