lotuspsychje | good morning | 01:57 |
---|---|---|
marcoagpinto | Morning! | 04:24 |
wyoung | Afternoon! | 05:33 |
lordievader | Good morning | 06:22 |
ducasse | good morning | 07:58 |
tomreyn | middle of the day, kind of afternnoon-ish! | 14:12 |
jochensp | tomreyn: o/ | 16:26 |
tomreyn | hi jochensp | 16:26 |
jochensp | to recap: focal-updates contained libc6_2.31-0ubuntu9.3 before but it was removed and now provides 2.31-0ubuntu9.2 again (cf. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1912652/comments/15) this breaks systems with the .3 installed. I would expect version numbers in focal-updates to only increase, is there such guarantee? | 16:28 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1912652 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Hirsute) "Upgrading libc6-lse breaks on systems it is in use" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 16:28 |
tomreyn | breaks how? | 16:29 |
jochensp | like you have libc6_2.31-0ubuntu9.3 installed and now want to install libc6-i386 where you only get .2 but due to being version locked with libc6 is not installable | 16:30 |
jochensp | same for libc6-dev | 16:30 |
tomreyn | hmm, i see. can't comment then. | 16:31 |
jochensp | tomreyn: ok, where should I ask then? | 16:31 |
TJ- | jochensp: see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+publishinghistory | 16:32 |
jochensp | TJ-: I saw that and I think it's a bad idea ;) | 16:32 |
tomreyn | jochensp: the initial question seems like a support question to me. just the "how do you call this" question didn't seem like one, which is why i suggested moving here to keep the name discussion out of #ubuntu.- | 16:32 |
TJ- | due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-core20/+bug/1926355 | 16:32 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1926355 in snap-core20 "Snap applications segfault with new core20 (rev: 1015+)" [Critical,New] | 16:32 |
TJ- | The update has been reverted, please downgrade glibc binary packges to 2.31-0ubuntu9.2 until the new update becomes available. | 16:33 |
TJ- | The problem seems to be caused by the fix for LP: #1914044. | 16:33 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1914044 in glibc (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] gstreamer fails with "cannot allocate memory in static TLS block" error on aarch64" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1914044 | 16:33 |
jochensp | TJ-: I downgraded, but I think Canonical should have issued a .4 equal to the .2 instead | 16:34 |
TJ- | jochensp: agreed | 16:34 |
tomreyn | i tend to agree to this | 16:34 |
TJ- | jochensp: .4-really.2 | 16:34 |
jochensp | no real need to use -really if it's not a upstream version revert ;) | 16:35 |
tomreyn | this has been done before, not sure why it wasn't done here, or not yet | 16:35 |
TJ- | I wonder if it was deleted because the AA thought it was only in -proposed and it had already begun migration to -updates | 16:35 |
TJ- | looking at the timelines that seems plausible | 16:35 |
lotuspsychje | early 20.04 devel had a libc issue too after updates | 16:36 |
tomreyn | jochensp: maybe bring it up in #ubuntu-devel | 16:36 |
jochensp | ok, will do | 16:37 |
tomreyn | you should probably also add this note on 1912652 | 16:38 |
jochensp | that was the other option, I rather though I would find someone here to fix this soon but then got distracted in $dayjob.. | 16:39 |
tomreyn | yes, those tend to be way too distracting | 16:40 |
tomreyn | now focus on what really matters! ;-) | 16:40 |
jochensp | well, then I will ignore this and work on Debian :P | 16:41 |
tomreyn | hehe | 16:41 |
[VMGuy23] | time to reinstall 21.04! | 19:15 |
[VMGuy23] | graphix | 19:15 |
[VMGuy23] | (fix graphics) | 19:15 |
[VMGuy23] | ubuntu installer is really slow | 19:25 |
daftykins | nonsense | 19:29 |
leftyfb | image someone running an actual public server on WSL? ;) | 19:32 |
Walex | leftyfb: that is GNU/NT, not too different from GNU/Linux or GNU/BSD. | 19:50 |
leftyfb | Walex: WSL uses the linux kernel | 19:50 |
leftyfb | Walex: so not really | 19:51 |
Walex | BTW IIRC there are two WSL: v1 has a Linux system call layer, the inverse of WINE, v2 is more similar to User Mode Linux. | 19:51 |
[VMGuy23] | Wine has decided to not suck for once | 20:08 |
=== JanC is now known as Guest66672 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
[VMGuy23] | It's surprising, really | 20:14 |
[VMGuy23] | And it is performing very well | 20:29 |
Walex | Yes, WINE has been pretty good for a while, but it has always been quite fast. It is not an emulator after all, it is a native implementation. | 20:38 |
ravage | The name itself says that actually :) | 21:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!