[14:29] o/ [14:29] Any SRU/MRU meeting today or cancelled due to the sprint? [14:29] o/ [14:30] we'll try to do it [14:30] as the cycle starts there are finally a few work items to assign :-) [14:32] sounds good [14:32] o/ [14:32] ddstreet: doko: sarnold: jamespage: didrocks: ping [14:32] #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status [14:32] Meeting started at 14:32:29 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [14:32] Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick [14:32] Hi, we have no actions of last week - so we skip that section [14:33] but with Impish opening there are other things to do [14:33] #topic current component mismatches [14:33] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg [14:33] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg [14:34] Not much new things, but ibus-libpinyin -> opencc -> marisa [14:34] opencc is demoted as of today but has an old approved MIR in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencc/+bug/611210 [14:34] Launchpad bug 611210 in opencc (Ubuntu) "[MIR] opencc" [Undecided,Fix released] [14:34] Marisa is here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/marisa/+bug/1914808 [14:34] Launchpad bug 1914808 in marisa (Ubuntu) "[MIR] marisa" [Undecided,In progress] [14:35] I haven't checked in detail - but from a quick look that seems to be promotable [14:35] good morning [14:35] you did a first pass, correct? [14:35] one of the AAs here able to later have a detailed look and if indeed ok promote it? [14:35] hey sarnold [14:35] hi sarnold [14:35] yeah, will do [14:36] Other than that component mismatches only reminds us that backuppc dependencies wait for seucrity review [14:36] we have postponed this to impish to free up some pressure on security, but now I'm fully back to say "we need this" ;-) [14:36] sarnold: ^^ FYI [14:36] ack :) [14:36] and we have new MIRs again with the cycle starting [14:36] #topic New MIRs [14:37] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:37] There are two from the server team of which one I'd want anyone not being me to review [14:37] let us get started [14:37] #1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/telegraf/+bug/1926321 [14:37] Launchpad bug 1926321 in telegraf (Ubuntu) "[MIR] telegraf" [Undecided,New] [14:38] It is another case of the "vendored go because nothing else would work reasonably well" [14:38] we had a few of those already and I guess it will eventually be approved under the same banner [14:38] but to avoid the feeling of self-approving I'd want someone else to review this [14:38] anyone up to that? [14:38] I can have a look at that one [14:38] but warning, yeah, the vendoring won’t shock me for sure :) [14:38] Thank [14:38] you [14:39] in return I'd voluteer to take https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmanette/+bug/1918446 which is a desktopish thing [14:39] Launchpad bug 1918446 in libmanette (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libmanette" [Undecided,New] [14:39] thanks! In case you need anything, I know upstream quite well [14:39] awesome [14:39] and finally there is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1927004 [14:39] Launchpad bug 1927004 in fence-agents (Ubuntu) "[MIR] fence-agents" [Undecided,New] [14:39] that is a package that was in main in the long past (precise) [14:40] then everone realized the mixed quality [14:40] but it was and is important [14:40] so the new approach is to split the binary packages into good, bad and ugly [14:40] to only promote and support the former [14:40] Anyone left able to look at that? [14:40] sounds really like gstreamer plugins/codec :) [14:41] * didrocks would prefer someone else to take it to ensure that it’s dealt properly by next Tuesday [14:41] * cpaelzer as well [14:41] 1 each would be my preferred fair assignment [14:42] since we need sarnold for security reviews I wonder if ddstreet / doko / jamespage would have a chance to look at this please ? [14:42] sure i can take it, lp:#1927004 ? [14:42] yes ddstreet [14:42] thanks! [14:42] sorry i have split attention with the sprint [14:42] great - all incoming cases assigned [14:43] #topic Incomplete bugs / questions [14:43] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:43] 21 of them [14:43] The only real recent case is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensc/+bug/1892559 [14:43] Launchpad bug 1892559 in opensc (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ccid opensc pcsc-lite" [Undecided,Incomplete] [14:44] That had a few "please adapt this before we go on" requests [14:44] those are discussed, some are resolved some are not needed and some need work [14:44] AFAICS process wise this still is on security Team as the next major step [14:45] Nothing else recent in that queue [14:45] which brings us to [14:45] #topic Any other business? [14:45] nothing but the cases we assigned above from me [14:45] nothing from me [14:45] nothing from me [14:45] nothing [14:46] luna: to explain - yes the list has 12 entries but we only check those that had updates since they were last discussed [14:46] post LTS we sometimes clean some super old cases, but there is no strict cleanup rule for these [14:47] cpaelzer: ah alright [14:47] So overall we see the cycle start as expected, new review requests come in and have assigned them [14:47] best of luck to find the time to complete them before next week (not starting a backlog in the first week) :-) [14:47] yes, "start"... [14:48] :-) [14:48] Seems we are done for today and I'd then close the meeting [14:48] thanks cpaelzer, didrocks, ddstreet, luna :) [14:48] #endmeeting [14:48] Meeting ended at 14:48:17 UTC. Minutes at https://new.ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2021/ubuntu-meeting.2021-05-04-14.32.moin.txt [14:48] thanks everyone! [14:49] thx [19:02] \o [19:10] * mdeslaur -> away