[01:51] <callmepk> good morning
[01:55] <duflu> Morning callmepk 
[01:56] <callmepk> morning duflu
[05:30] <luna> morning
[05:40] <duflu> Hi luna 
[05:54] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:01] <didrocks> good morning
[06:06] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks 
[06:07] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN and didrocks 
[06:09] <oSoMoN> hey duflu 
[06:13] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN, hey duflu 
[06:21] <callmepk> morning luna oSoMoN didrocks 
[06:34] <oSoMoN> hey callmepk 
[07:03] <ricotz> good morning
[07:03]  * ricotz eyes the arm64 autopkgtest of libreoffice
[07:05] <didrocks> hey callmepk 
[08:02] <Laney> ello
[08:04] <RikMills> ricotz: I did more than eye it. it involved swear words
[08:06] <RikMills> oh, and morning :)
[08:11] <duflu> Hi Laney
[08:11] <duflu> and hi RikMills 
[08:17] <didrocks> hey Laney 
[08:21] <ricotz> hey Laney RikMills duflu didrocks 
[08:21] <ricotz> RikMills, haha, it looks good, just took a lot of time
[08:21] <didrocks> hey ricotz 
[08:22] <ricotz> so I am hoping libreoffice will transition soon
[08:22] <RikMills> ricotz: pleased for you. mine got a random badpkg on one test as something somewhere in the archive must have been hinky
[08:24] <RikMills> such are things though
[08:24] <ricotz> yeah. random failures are fun :(
[08:28] <seb128> goood morningg desktopers
[08:30] <RikMills> would be nice if we could see the log of running tests so you know that test 1/17 subtests has failed, and not have to wait another 18hrs to find that out
[08:31] <didrocks> hey seb128 
[08:37] <duflu> Morning seb128 
[08:50] <ricotz> hey seb128 
[09:25] <seb128> Laney, thanks for doing those metrics codereviews! 
[09:39] <Laney> hey seb128 & others, sorry I didn't re-hey, feels too long to highlight you back!
[09:39] <Laney> np
[09:42] <Laney> seb128: did you see that it semi broke the panel though? probably needs a where report = 'sponsoring' or report = 'ubuntu' now or something?
[09:49] <seb128> Laney, no, I'm going to check that in a bit, thanks for pointing it out
[09:53] <Laney> 👍
[10:03] <seb128> k, updated now
[10:04] <Laney> nice one
[14:30] <hellsworth> good morning desktopers
[14:46] <seb128> Trevinho, you might want to send that emoji email to ubuntu-translators@ rather than to coordinators
[14:46] <Trevinho> seb128: sent to both... wasn't sure what was the proper one :P
[14:46] <seb128> k
[15:38] <Trevinho> seb128: I was talking with Laney about it and maybe we could just use the same strategy of pkgstriptranslations, and leave to langpack-o-matic to put it in the localized package?
[15:38] <Trevinho> however, while looking at it, do you have any clue why tusty is hardcoded there?! https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/langpack-o-matic/main/revision/534
[15:39] <Trevinho> aren't we loading static translations from newer releases?
[15:45] <seb128> Trevinho, where is it hardcoded exactly?
[15:45] <Trevinho> sorry I sent you the base link..
[15:45] <Trevinho> https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/langpack-o-matic/main/view/head:/import#L300
[15:46] <Trevinho> not sure if that else meant to be removed and use translations += ... 
[15:46] <Trevinho> I mean use the old ones + the new ones, but...
[18:57] <seb128> Trevinho, hum, I would need to check, I will try to do that tomorrow
[18:57] <Trevinho> ok
[18:58] <seb128> but sounds like the fallback might need to be smarter indeed