[14:56] <bdmurray> seb128: thanks for working on the ddeb issues. With regards to bug 1922451 - did you look for any other superseded ddebs?
[15:05] <seb128> bdmurray, no, I mentioned it on ~Launchpad but the query isn't trivial and I don't have time this week to investigate more the topic. If you want to do that it would we welcome
[15:06] <bdmurray> seb128: I'll try and have a look.
[15:06] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks!
[16:13] <RikMills> dbungert: I poked those tests a bit more and got passes. I think sshuttle should migrate at the end of the current britney run
[16:13] <dbungert> RikMills: I saw that, thanks for the prodding
[16:15] <dbungert> would be nice though if that 5 hour test can be shortened, I'm filing a wishlist bug on that
[16:15] <RikMills> would also be nice if they weren't quite flaky :/
[16:15] <RikMills> at least on the ubuntu infra
[16:19] <vorlon> rbasak: as there are still some packages on i386 where we care about testing, I would want us to hint explicitly where the tests are known to not be relevant
[16:20] <rbasak> vorlon: thanks. By not relevant, would that include any package which isn't related to i386's remaining wine/games/third party binary use case?
[16:21] <rbasak> vorlon: and if so, would an unversioned hint be acceptable?
[16:25] <vorlon> rbasak: can we look at an example together?  I wonder if it's already hinted in the devel branch
[16:25] <vorlon> rbasak: all/i386 hints are often appropriate
[16:26] <vorlon> rbasak: but generally that's for packages that don't exist on i386 at all
[16:31] <rbasak> vorlon: can't remember if I mentioned, sorry. My question is prompted by ubuntu-advantage-tools i386 autopkgtest failure in Focal.
[16:33] <vorlon> rbasak: ah - so it's a regression because the package went from having no i386 bits to having an arch: all package present on all archs.  Yeah, an all/i386 hint is appropriate here
[16:33] <rbasak> OK. thanks!