=== jochensp1 is now known as jochensp === pieq_ is now known as pieq [14:56] seb128: thanks for working on the ddeb issues. With regards to bug 1922451 - did you look for any other superseded ddebs? [14:56] bug 1922451 in ddeb-retriever "irssi-dbgsym missing for focal-updates" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1922451 [15:05] bdmurray, no, I mentioned it on ~Launchpad but the query isn't trivial and I don't have time this week to investigate more the topic. If you want to do that it would we welcome [15:06] seb128: I'll try and have a look. [15:06] bdmurray, thanks! [16:13] dbungert: I poked those tests a bit more and got passes. I think sshuttle should migrate at the end of the current britney run [16:13] RikMills: I saw that, thanks for the prodding [16:15] would be nice though if that 5 hour test can be shortened, I'm filing a wishlist bug on that [16:15] would also be nice if they weren't quite flaky :/ [16:15] at least on the ubuntu infra [16:19] rbasak: as there are still some packages on i386 where we care about testing, I would want us to hint explicitly where the tests are known to not be relevant [16:20] vorlon: thanks. By not relevant, would that include any package which isn't related to i386's remaining wine/games/third party binary use case? [16:21] vorlon: and if so, would an unversioned hint be acceptable? [16:25] rbasak: can we look at an example together? I wonder if it's already hinted in the devel branch [16:25] rbasak: all/i386 hints are often appropriate [16:26] rbasak: but generally that's for packages that don't exist on i386 at all [16:31] vorlon: can't remember if I mentioned, sorry. My question is prompted by ubuntu-advantage-tools i386 autopkgtest failure in Focal. [16:33] rbasak: ah - so it's a regression because the package went from having no i386 bits to having an arch: all package present on all archs. Yeah, an all/i386 hint is appropriate here [16:33] OK. thanks!