| bdmurray | guiverc: really? it was talked about. I'll look into it on Monday. | 00:02 |
|---|---|---|
| guiverc | thanks bdmurray :) | 00:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-gsva [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.38.2+ds-2] (no packageset) | 11:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-gsva [s390x] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.38.2+ds-2] (no packageset) | 11:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-gsva [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.38.2+ds-2] (no packageset) | 11:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-gsva [arm64] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.38.2+ds-2] (no packageset) | 11:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-gsva [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.38.2+ds-2] (no packageset) | 11:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-gsva [riscv64] (impish-proposed/universe) [1.38.2+ds-2] (no packageset) | 11:46 | |
| ddstreet | guiverc it was already announced: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2021-March/000266.html | 12:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-gsva [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.38.2+ds-2] | 12:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-gsva [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1.38.2+ds-2] | 12:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-gsva [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [1.38.2+ds-2] | 12:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-gsva [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1.38.2+ds-2] | 12:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-gsva [s390x] (impish-proposed) [1.38.2+ds-2] | 12:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-gsva [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [1.38.2+ds-2] | 12:53 | |
| * enyc meows | 13:33 | |
| hallyn | was looking at the oldest in focal unapproved queue, youtube-dl - it builds and installs fine, but depends on debhelper-compat 13, focal is on 12, what's the usual way to handle that? | 14:42 |
| hallyn | i saw another pkg where they just lowered the dependency on the bakcport... | 14:42 |
| rbasak | For -updates, I think it's a case of adjusting the packaging to use the version of the debhelper available | 14:48 |
| rbasak | Newer debhelper goes into -backports sometimes, but I don't recall this ever having been done in -updates | 14:48 |
| hallyn | it's actually targeted for backports | 15:21 |
| hallyn | anyway it's been there 11 months so is out of date with what's in newer releases again anyway, | 15:22 |
| hallyn | tmepted to reject and ask them to re-do with newest, but that seems rude | 15:22 |
| rbasak | Ah I didn't realise you were reviewing backports. I didn't think you were in the backporters team though? How does that work? | 17:03 |
| rbasak | Because availability of backports reviews has been an issue for the past few years. | 17:05 |
| hallyn | rbasak: lol, i'm not. i'm just looking through the queue | 18:07 |
| hallyn | in part to narrow it down so that my 'lxc' unapproved one can get looked at :) | 18:07 |
| hallyn | honestly i don't know waht teams there are at this point. there's a separate backport team? | 18:08 |
| rbasak | hallyn: there is but it's basically inactive. I think you'd struggle to find any backporters team member who has actually reviewed something for backports recently. | 18:37 |
| guiverc | ddstreet, that was a warning (and mirrrored to fridge); convention is the follow that up on event with the actual annoucement (expected last saturday my local time, or late friday 30 for most) | 19:36 |
| stgraber | looks like grub in xenial is rather broken | 19:58 |
| stgraber | grub-efi-amd64-signed : Depends: grub2-common (>= 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.31) but 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29 is to be installed | 19:58 |
| stgraber | been breaking all Xenial MAAS deploys and also breaking xenial image builds | 19:58 |
| stgraber | looking like a partial SRU or a partial SRU revert happened | 19:58 |
| juliank | stgraber: confirmed, src:grub2 was not released, but src:grub2-signed needs the new -common | 20:11 |
| juliank | stgraber: we really ought to have tooling to prevent stuff like this - or releasing packages that have a block-<release>-proposed (or whatever it was) tag | 20:12 |
| juliank | In an optimal world, releasing an SRU would be giving britney a unblock hint, and then have britney do the copy/move, such that it can still do its checks | 20:13 |
| juliank | xnox, vorlon ^ grub2 in xenial is broken atm, src:grub2-signed was released, but src:grub2 not, but former depends on latter :/ | 20:14 |
| juliank | In other news, we're now down to ~5K tests on arm64 impish, from 8k | 20:16 |
| juliank | So, not sure if queue will be empty on monday | 20:17 |
| stgraber | just looked at the grub2 SRU and though it's past the waiting period, the fixes haven't been confirmed on it, otherwise I could have done a quick sru-release to fix things. If we can have someone quickly confirm the grub build as good to go, I can release it. Otherwise we'd need to revert the grub2-signed back to the previous build, but that tends to get quite messy... | 20:21 |
| juliank | stgraber: the grub2 update .31 regressed the autopkgtest infra, and was validated, so does not need revalidation for 1915536 really; just for 1926748 | 20:31 |
| juliank | stgraber: I don't remember how I reproduced other issue :/ | 20:35 |
| juliank | stgraber: Verifying now. I've rerun the top of https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/update-notifier/xenial/arm64, once it passes upgrading grub2 at the start we should be good :D | 20:44 |
| juliank | stgraber: verified | 20:47 |
| stgraber | juliank: done | 21:58 |
| guiverc | thanks juliank (grub+shim on arm64 likely still cause) | 23:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: jcabi-aspects [amd64] (impish-proposed/none) [0.22.6-1] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jcabi-aspects [amd64] (impish-proposed) [0.22.6-1] | 23:34 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!