[01:40] <petrj> hi, if there is a missing package in ubuntu, what's the right place to request/report for it?
[13:36] <juliank> I feel like the "# Copyright (c) (c) 2006 Canonical Ltd, and Rosetta Contributors 2006" in translations is a bit wrong these days
[15:30] <r0zbot-> Hello, I'm trying to automate the "snapcraft remote-build" process using github actions, but I've run into a bit of a snag. It always runs on a different host so it always hangs at the "waiting of launchpad token" step. Is there a way to manually create and pass it that token?
[15:57] <tomwardill> r0zbot-: I think you'd need snapcraft support for that, rather than launchpad. Although have you considered using snapcraft.io for the build, rather than remote-build?
[16:08] <r0zbot-> I tried using it, but its not that flexible for us. We wanted to run some automated deployment tests on the packages after building but it didn't seem like there was a way to do that (nor a way to make it call a webhook to do that externally), it just built them and released on the edge channel at each commit to the repo (we only really wanted that on created releases also)
[16:08] <r0zbot-> but thanks, I'll ask there
[16:14] <tomwardill> r0zbot-: ah, that's fair enough. Although can you not just build the snap in the CI action? I'm mostly just curious about using remote-build for something like that, it's not a use case I'd considered for that feature.
[16:20] <r0zbot-> well, I can for x86_64, but we also wanted armf and arm64 builds
[16:21] <r0zbot-> but its probably easier to just set up some self hosted runners for those archs
[16:22] <rbasak> Automated deployment tests: request in https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/launchpad-post-build-pre-upload-testing/5545 (never resolved)
[16:22] <tomwardill> probably cheaper than waiting on the LP build farm to produce a build :)
[16:22] <tomwardill> if you're paying by the minute for the github action
[16:24] <r0zbot-> lol thats fair enough
[18:30] <ricotz> pappacena, hello :), could you take a look at the builder, there are a lot of them stuck in "Cleaning" again
[18:37] <pappacena> ricotz let me check if I discover something
[18:44] <pappacena> Poked them. Let's see if that will help, or I will need to dig further...
[19:03] <ricotz> pappacena, thank you
[19:26] <ricotz> pappacena, seems to be a bigger problem than usual
[19:26] <pappacena> yep, let me check that internally...
[19:57] <pappacena> Ok, so it seems that we are having some trouble booting some of the builders, but I'm not aware of the root cause yet.
[19:57] <pappacena> I think c jwatson knows the history of this issue, but he is out today...
[20:19] <ricotz> thanks for investigating, I am hoping this can be fixed soon