/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/05/17/#ubuntu-release.txt

LocutusOfBorghello, can we please hint node-d3-transition? it fails now against itself and I opened an upstream ticket https://github.com/d3/d3-transition/issues/12607:32
ubot3Issue 126 in d3/d3-transition "test 122 failure on Ubuntu" [Open]07:32
gitbotd3 issue 126 in d3-transition "test 122 failure on Ubuntu" [Open]07:32
LocutusOfBorghttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/node-d3-transition/impish/arm6407:32
LocutusOfBorglooks like random failing on amd64 and failing on arm6407:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.11.0-1008.8] (core)08:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1040.41] (no packageset)08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fabric-manager-450 [amd64] (impish-proposed) [450.119.04-0ubuntu1]08:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fabric-manager-460 [amd64] (impish-proposed) [460.73.01-0ubuntu1]08:30
RikMillsso upgrades to 21.04 are back to being disabled. is that an error since the shim bug is fixed? or another reason?09:11
RikMillsas it was reported that upgrades were switched on last week09:12
jamespagesil2100: morning09:22
jamespageif you have cycles today the verification of the ceph uploads for focal and groovy has been completed - the unverified bug is the patch that was dropped in the .2 uploads09:23
juliankRikMills: some more things boot, others still don't09:23
juliankRikMills: not sure if reason, but https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192843409:24
ubot3Launchpad bug 1928434 in shim (Ubuntu) "shim-signed does not boot on EFI 2.40 by Apple" [Critical, Triaged]09:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1040.41]09:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.11.0-1008.8]09:28
RikMillsjuliank: ah, the meta-release file modification time/date would make sense with that bug coming to light09:39
sil2100jamespage: hey! Thanks for the heads up, I'll try to get to it in a bit o/10:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1044.46~18.04.1] (no packageset)10:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libvirt-glib [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-1] (desktop-extra)11:51
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
sil2100jamespage: ok, looking at it right now - in the meantime a gentle reminder about ceph in hirsute!13:03
sil2100jamespage: oh and whoops, groovy ceph FTBFS on armhf!13:04
sil2100/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/src/mgr/PyModuleRegistry.cc:420:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault13:04
sil2100hm, might be transient, let me re-try the build13:05
sil2100Ouch, I see armhf builds of ceph take ~10 hours?13:05
sil2100I won't be able to release it without armhf built13:06
sil2100Anyway, re-triggering, leaving the build log of the failure opened just in case13:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-signed (groovy-proposed/main) [1.30.1 => 1.30.2] (core)13:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.7-0~20.10.2]13:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-signed [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.30.2]13:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (groovy-proposed/main) [1.4.7-0~20.10.2 => 1.4.7-0~20.10.2] (core)13:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (groovy-proposed/main) [1.4.7-0~20.10.2 => 1.4.7-0~20.10.2] (core)13:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (groovy-proposed/main) [1.4.7-0~20.10.2 => 1.4.7-0~20.10.2] (core)13:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fence-agents [s390x] (impish-proposed/universe) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fence-agents [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)14:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fence-agents [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/universe) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)14:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fence-agents [arm64] (impish-proposed/universe) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)14:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fence-agents [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)14:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: resource-agents [s390x] (impish-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server)14:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: resource-agents [amd64] (impish-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server)14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: resource-agents [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server)14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: resource-agents [arm64] (impish-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server)14:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.7-0~20.10.2]14:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.7-0~20.10.2]14:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [1.4.7-0~20.10.2]14:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: resource-agents [armhf] (impish-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server)14:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fence-agents [riscv64] (impish-proposed/universe) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)14:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: resource-agents [riscv64] (impish-proposed/main) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server)14:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fence-agents [amd64] (impish-proposed) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fence-agents [armhf] (impish-proposed) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fence-agents [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted resource-agents [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted resource-agents [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted resource-agents [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fence-agents [arm64] (impish-proposed) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fence-agents [s390x] (impish-proposed) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted resource-agents [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fence-agents [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [4.7.1-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted resource-agents [s390x] (impish-proposed) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4]14:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted resource-agents [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1:4.7.0-1ubuntu4]15:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libvirt-glib [amd64] (impish-proposed) [4.0.0-1]15:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1044.46~18.04.1]15:07
vorlonRikMills-M: meta-release> LP: #192843415:15
ubot3Launchpad bug 1928434 in shim (Ubuntu) "shim-signed does not boot on EFI 2.40 by Apple" [Critical, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192843415:15
RikMillsvorlon: thanks for confirming the reason :)15:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1016.17] (no packageset)15:22
jamespagesil2100: I'd missed that :)15:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1016.17]18:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (focal-proposed/main) [2.0.3-3ubuntu4.2 => 2.0.3-3ubuntu4.3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)19:24
fossfreedomHi - quick question to the release team please.  Just checking today's Impish daily for Ubuntu Budgie - the apt sources are still "hirsute" - any ideas what I may have missed to ensure apt sources pick up from the impish repos?20:08
EickmeyerQuestion for the SRU team: I submitted bug 1928146 as a SRU for nvidia-modprobe and nvidia-settings. Dropped the nvidia-settings since that's part of a separate SRU, but the upload for nvidia-modprobe is done.20:40
ubot3Bug 1928146 in nvidia-settings (Ubuntu Hirsute) "Please SRU nvidia-modprobe 465.24 and nvidia-settings 460.73" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192814620:40
vorlonEickmeyer: I don't read a question in the above?21:02
Eickmeyervorlon: Sorry, my mistake. I was wondering if anybody had taken a look at it? I guess I'm just concerned that I saw no action. I realize there's a ton of other SRUs, but hadn't even received an acknowledgement.21:03
vorlonEickmeyer: when you say you "submitted" it, are you referring to opening the bug tasks for earlier releases?  Because I don't see anything in the queue; the SRU team processes SRUs that have been uploaded, so a bug opened on the stable releases without a corresponding upload is not on our radar21:08
Eickmeyervorlon: I uploaded nvidia-modprobe already?21:09
vorlonEickmeyer: to which release?  again, it's not in the queue21:09
EickmeyerHirsute, Groovy, and Focal. If it's not there, I'll try again.21:10
vorlonok21:10
Eickmeyervorlon: This is weird. I have .upload files with records of upload for each one of those releases.21:12
Eickmeyervorlon: I see it in the Unapproved queue.21:13
vorlonEickmeyer: for which release?21:13
EickmeyerHirsute, Groovy, and Focal. All 3.21:13
vorlonEickmeyer: you uploaded it to backports?21:14
vorlonthat would explain why I wasn't seeing it with 'queue -Q unapproved -s hirsute-proposed'21:14
vorlonand backports are not the domain of the SRU team but of the moribund backports team21:14
EickmeyerOh shoot. I suppose I can fix that. Wanna reject those?21:15
vorlonsure21:15
EickmeyerThanks.21:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-modprobe [source] (groovy-backports) [465.24.02-1~ubuntu20.10.1]21:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-modprobe [source] (hirsute-backports) [465.24.02-1~ubuntu21.04.1]21:16
Eickmeyervorlon: Weird that it went to backports for those. The one for Focal was definitely for updates though.21:16
vorlonEickmeyer: it should only have gone to backports if you had 'backports' in debian/changelog21:17
EickmeyerThat might explain it. I should've specified the SRU title.21:17
vorlonand yes, I see it in the queue for focal; the focal queue seems to have a few things ahead of it21:17
EickmeyerAwesome. I'll just reupload for hirsute and groovy then.21:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-modprobe (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [460.32.03-0ubuntu20.10.1 => 465.24.02-1~ubuntu20.10.1] (no packageset)21:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-modprobe (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [460.32.03-1 => 465.24.02-1~ubuntu21.04.1] (no packageset)21:23
Eickmeyervorlon: Do those look any better? ^21:23
vorlonEickmeyer: yep :)21:23
EickmeyerAwesome. :)21:24
sergiodjvorlon: new sssd from debian depends on libpam-wrapper, which is not on i386.  I'm checking if it can be disabled there (it's <!nocheck>), but just a heads up that we might need more packages on i386 because :-/22:14
vorlonsergiodj: annoying :) libpam-wrapper itself seems to be a trivial build though22:15
sergiodjyeah22:15
sergiodjI'll keep you posted :)22:15
mwhudsonso what are the usual reasons for tests passing locally but not on the autopkgtest machines22:17
mwhudsonthis one involves ghostscript, which makes me think apparmor22:17
mwhudsonbut surely the autopkgtest runners don't have different apparmor config to what autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud does?22:18
mwhudsonor if they do, i would like to register a complaint :-)22:18
vorlonnot that I'm aware of22:27
vorlonnetwork config is often different (proxy, firewall)22:27
mwhudsoni think the xfig failures are because something ghostscipty is failing and then it tries to pop up a dialog to explain why and this fails because there is no ui running22:28
mwhudsonbut this of course neatly obscures what the ghostscripty failure is :/22:28
mwhudsontesting a change that should show the error better, maybe22:29
mwhudsonif this is down to network config differences, i would also like to register a complaint, but not with our infrastructure this time :)22:30
mwhudsonheh christian's mail to ubuntu-devel reminds me that it can be ISA differences too22:35
bdmurrayvorlon: I've sru-verified ubuntu-release-upgrader in focal-proposed which fixes bug 1928397. I think it'd be nice to release early but I'm fine either way.22:35
ubot3Bug 1928397 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal) "ensure python is marked for removal when upgrading from 18.04 to 20.04" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/192839722:35
mwhudson(that would also be upsetting)22:35
bdmurrayAt this rate I'm gonna put money on mwhudson being upset22:36
mwhudsonyeah that's pretty likely22:37
mwhudsonCannot open pipe with command:22:38
mwhudsongs -q -dNODISPLAY "--permit-file-read=../.././data/cross.pdf" -c "(../.././data/cross.pdf) (r) file runpdfbegin 1 pdfgetpage /MediaBox pget pop == quit"22:38
mwhudsonwell ok22:38
mwhudsonwhy not, damn you22:38
vorlonsoooo what changed that caused update-motd autopkgtest to start failing with an 'Invalid argument' to fcntl?  doesn't appear to be glibc, which migrated a day later22:49
vorlonand the kernel didn't change22:50
vorlonand python3.9 didn't change22:51
mwhudsonhow does it even call fcntl? flock i guess?22:54
vorlonseems to be a direct call to fcntl.fcntl within debian/tests/wait-for-apt-update-to-finish22:54
mwhudsonoh yeah i see it22:55
mwhudsonarmhf only22:55
mwhudsonlxd / seccomp?22:55
mwhudsonthere was a lxd release on the 7th, which is around the window when it started failing22:57
mwhudsonalthough this run is after that https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/armhf/u/update-motd/20210513_173146_86ab6@/log.gz and although it fails for other reasons, no EINVAL22:59
vorlonwe don't get lxd versions in the logs, do we23:00
vorlonbut right, it'd be the same lxd version across suites23:01
mwhudsondoesn't look like it23:01
mwhudsonno libseccomp changes23:01
mwhudsonanyway it's the host one that would matter surely23:02
mwhudsonvorlon: i'll try running it in a lxd locally23:03
mwhudsonhttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=amd64&package=xfig&ppa=mwhudson/devirt&trigger=xfig/1:3.2.8-2ubuntu1~ppa3 -> "You submitted an invalid request: xfig/1:3.2.8-2ubuntu1~ppa3 is not published in PPA mwhudson/devirt impish"23:07
mwhudsoner, yes it is?23:07
mwhudsonunsurprisingly update-motd tests pass locally in a lxd23:10
mwhudsonvorlon: can you or IS get syslog from the hosts? i guess they are ephemeral vms so "not easily"?23:10
vorlonmwhudson: the host is persistent, so I can get into it and check syslog; anything particular you want me to look for?23:21
mwhudsonvorlon: just secomp / apparmor noise23:22
mwhudsonbut it's totally guessing at this point23:22
vorlonmwhudson: nothing aligned with the times of the tests23:25
mwhudsonvorlon: hmmph23:26
mwhudsonvorlon: jam a strace in somewhere?23:26
* mwhudson just making stuff up now23:27

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!