[07:27] <nomad_fr> Hi
[07:27] <nomad_fr> I maybe understand my encrypt hibernation trouble, I think it come from systemd order
[07:35] <guiverc> nomad_fr, this isn't a support channel, #ubuntu provides support
[07:40] <nomad_fr> guiverc: I think it's finaly not a support trouble ;-)
[11:52] <sil2100> Laney: hey! Thanks for the review, I will address most of your concerns soon - but I left a few comments inline as well, could you take a look at those soonish?
[11:52] <sil2100> I'm a bit under the weather today so I might only act on those tomorrow, but I'll try to do something today as well
[11:54] <Laney> yeah sure,  some of those were meant to be more like questions/thoughts
[11:54] <Laney> but will check soonish
[14:46] <hallyn> hey sarnold you (i think it was you) had suggested i coudl go through https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1 and mark some as rejected.  But ... how do i mark them as rejected? :)  i.e. the youtube-dl one, i think ought to be re-done as newer version and the debhelper dependency handled .
[16:28] <sarnold> hallyn: it was probably someone else, I don't know the incoming queue well enough to suggest rejecting anything in there
[16:28] <cjwatson> Only people with queue admin permissions (SRU/archive teams) can reject from there.
[16:28] <hallyn> sarnold: ok i'll have to look through the logs later thanks :)
[16:29] <sarnold> hallyn: cool, if it was me, I'd like to know about it :D
[16:29] <hallyn> cjwatson: ok and if i were to push a newer version, they woudl both sit in there until soeone rejects, right?  they don't obsolete?
[16:29] <cjwatson> Correct
[16:29] <hallyn> can't do it now though
[16:29] <hallyn> thanks
[17:47] <bdmurray> hallyn: its worth noting that the youtube-dl upload is actually for a backport of the package and the Ubuntu SRU team doesn't handle those.
[17:47] <hallyn> bdmurray: motu?
[17:47] <bdmurray> hallyn: Also I may have been the one who said you can review things and make suggesstions to the Ubuntu SRU team.
[17:47] <hallyn> bdmurray: ok thanks - i wasn't clear on where/how i shoudl make suggestions then :)
[17:48] <bdmurray> hallyn: Afaik the backports team is unstaffed.
[17:48] <hallyn> -backports is actually "kind of new" to me
[17:48] <hallyn> ok so not motu, backports is its own thing?
[17:49] <bdmurray> Here's a discussion about backports which has stalled https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2019-February/040587.html
[17:50] <bdmurray> hallyn: you could make suggestsion on SRUs in #ubuntu-release to the SRU team member on duty for that day or me as a backup
[17:55] <hallyn> bdmurray: and so #ubuntu-release would be for packages targetting NOT universe, and not backports?
[17:55] <hallyn> thanks, wil read https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2019-February/040587.html
[17:59] <bdmurray> hallyn: the SRU team also reviews packages for universe
[17:59] <bdmurray> hallyn: anything that ends up in -proposed and then -updates
[19:05] <sergiodj> tkamppeter: hi!  would you mind if I force-sync cups-filters with the package that's on debian experimental?  it contains a fix for an upcoming openldap transition
[19:23] <GunnarHj> Hi kc2bez[m], can you please give bug #1928360 some thought from a Lubuntu POV.
[20:04] <kc2bez[m]> GunnarHj: We will give it a look, thanks for the heads-up.
[20:06] <GunnarHj> kc2bez[m]: Good. TBH I'm not sure why Lubuntu ships fcitx by default for all users. No other flavors (except Kylin) does that.