[01:52] <lotuspsychje> good morning
[02:28] <isapgswell> hi
[02:31] <isapgswell> anyone knows why ubuntu software still lags to respond user input
[02:31] <isapgswell> ?
[06:12] <ducasse> good morning
[06:17] <lordievader> Good morning
[06:25] <Sparc343> Mornin'
[07:07] <marcoagpinto> Hello!
[07:25] <jo-erlend> marcoagpinto :)
[15:04] <lotuspsychje> any official statements from canonical regarding libera chat yet?
[15:05] <leftyfb> I saw this this morning but not sure of anything beyond it, not even sure what it means exactly:
[15:05] <leftyfb> [09:08:14] <topyli> well the alma folks seem to have some info that redhat and canonical are going to offer some guidance to the communities they support
[15:05] <leftyfb> [09:08:49] <topyli> they have no "direct" power of course over whatever fedora and ubuntu do, but de facto they do have a say :)
[15:06] <lotuspsychje> leftyfb: chanserv on libera not claimed #ubuntu yet so it seems
[15:07] <leftyfb> I'm sure that won't be a problem when it/if it comes to pass
[17:11] <TJ-> Are the ubuntu channels moving to libera?
[17:11] <lotuspsychje> seems like it TJ-
[17:12] <lotuspsychje> TJ-: https://gist.github.com/joepie91/df80d8d36cd9d1bde46ba018af497409/
[17:13] <TJ-> yeah, I know... was reading it a few days ago
[17:13] <lotuspsychje> but no official ubuntu/canonical statements yet
[17:17] <TJ-> looks like IRC council caught on the hop again :)
[18:33] <hggdh> there is also https://gist.github.com/shadowcat-mst/998cea12794768bdb3da2daeff31baad
[18:35] <hggdh> as far as I know there is no official position from Ubuntu on this. As of now.
[18:46] <Eickmeyer> This is to be discussed by the CC as it's a CC position.