[11:53] <utkarsh2102> hello! o/
[11:54] <utkarsh2102> could someone please re-trigger autopkgtest for pdepend with triger=phpunit&php-defaults; cf: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=arm64&package=pdepend&trigger=php-defaults/80~exp1&trigger=phpunit/9.5.4-1&trigger=pdepend/2.9.1-1
[11:59] <slyon> utkarsh2102: done
[12:03] <utkarsh2102> sylon: thank you!
[12:04] <utkarsh2102> slyon: thank you! (apologies for the typo earlier)
[12:04] <slyon> o/
[12:06] <utkarsh2102> woot! passed now
[12:07] <utkarsh2102> for armhf also, please: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=armhf&package=pdepend&trigger=php-defaults/80~exp1&trigger=phpunit/9.5.4-1&trigger=pdepend/2.9.1-1
[12:07] <utkarsh2102> and for ppc64el: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=ppc64el&package=pdepend&trigger=php-defaults/80~exp1&trigger=phpunit/9.5.4-1&trigger=pdepend/2.9.1-1
[12:08] <slyon> nice! done and done
[12:08] <utkarsh2102> and s390x, finally: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=s390x&package=pdepend&trigger=php-defaults/80~exp1&trigger=phpunit/9.5.4-1&trigger=pdepend/2.9.1-1
[12:08] <utkarsh2102> thank you, slyon! \o/
[12:08] <slyon> done!
[12:08] <utkarsh2102> lovely, thank you!
[12:09] <slyon> yw
[15:15] <paride> sil2100, hi!
[15:16] <paride> sil2100, python3-flake8 in focal-proposed is broken (uninstallable) and preventing packages build-depending on it from building
[15:17] <paride> it has been stuck in proposed for almost 300 days now
[15:17] <paride> related bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/1883175
[15:17] <ubot3> Launchpad bug 1883175 in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal) "Missing code linter support for python3.8 language features" [Low, Fix Committed]
[15:17] <paride> do you think it can be just pulled from focal-proposed at this point?
[15:23] <sil2100> paride: can you mark it as verification-failed-focal ?
[15:23] <sil2100> It will then be considered for removal and I can remove it
[15:23] <paride> sil2100, done
[18:57] <GunnarHj> Hi sarnold, Wondering if I can consider the apparmor part of bug #1928360 assigned to you. Also, do you think it is as easy as (almost) copying the fcitx 4 abstractions, or is there more into it?
[18:58] <ubot3> Bug 1928360 in Ubuntu Kylin "Switch to Fcitx 5 for Chinese" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1928360
[19:01] <sarnold> GunnarHj: I don't know nearly enough about what's going on there to take ownership of it at this point :(
[19:04] <GunnarHj> sarnold: Then who does? I don't know enough about apparmor and snaps to play around on my own.
[19:06] <sarnold> GunnarHj: maybe it's time to engage the snappy team?
[19:07] <GunnarHj> sarnold: That may be an option, yes. It's often unclear to me who is responsible for what when it comes to these things. ;)
[19:08] <sarnold> GunnarHj: tell me about it :(
[19:09] <GunnarHj> haha
[19:09] <sarnold> GunnarHj: jamie would have been perfect for this, he was really good at most of these, and only fcitx would have been new to him, but alas he's found greener pastures
[19:10] <GunnarHj> sarnold: Right, I see he did most of the input method related apparmor work in the past.
[19:24] <GunnarHj> sarnold: Your mentioning of Jamie's absence makes me think about another loose input method related end. Thinking about bug #1890905. Is that something for the apparmor team?
[19:24] <ubot3> Bug 1890905 in snapd (Ubuntu) "Snaps cannot access IBus when $XDG_CACHE_HOME is set" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1890905
[19:25] <sarnold> GunnarHj: no, that'll be snap
[19:29] <GunnarHj> sarnold: Are you sure? After all but #1423890 seems to very closely related.
[19:29] <GunnarHj> bug #1423890
[19:29] <ubot3> Bug 1423890 in apparmor (Ubuntu) "AppArmor support for the XDG Base Directory spec is incomplete" [Wishlist, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1423890
[20:34] <sarnold> GunnarHj: I don't think snap would just magically get ibus access or other xdg stuff correct if apparmor had a better XDG story; it probably would help with a clean implementation, but actually addressing 1890905 would require time investment from snap folks
[21:14] <GunnarHj> sarnold: Ok, thanks, I know too little to argue. Will try to call the snap devs' attention to these issues.
[21:15] <sarnold> GunnarHj: it's less 'argue' and more 'there's no way the apparmor team has time for this'..
[21:15] <GunnarHj> sarnold: I see. :(