=== ItzSwirlz_ is now known as ItzSwirlz === genii-core is now known as genii === genii-core is now known as genii === stgraber is now known as stgraber_ === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc === Adri2000 is now known as Adri2000_ === Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 === zyga is now known as zyga-mbp === nibbon_3 is now known as nibbon_ === zyga_ is now known as zyga [11:53] hello! o/ [11:54] could someone please re-trigger autopkgtest for pdepend with triger=phpunit&php-defaults; cf: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=arm64&package=pdepend&trigger=php-defaults/80~exp1&trigger=phpunit/9.5.4-1&trigger=pdepend/2.9.1-1 [11:59] utkarsh2102: done [12:03] sylon: thank you! [12:04] slyon: thank you! (apologies for the typo earlier) [12:04] o/ [12:06] woot! passed now [12:07] for armhf also, please: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=armhf&package=pdepend&trigger=php-defaults/80~exp1&trigger=phpunit/9.5.4-1&trigger=pdepend/2.9.1-1 [12:07] and for ppc64el: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=ppc64el&package=pdepend&trigger=php-defaults/80~exp1&trigger=phpunit/9.5.4-1&trigger=pdepend/2.9.1-1 [12:08] nice! done and done [12:08] and s390x, finally: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=impish&arch=s390x&package=pdepend&trigger=php-defaults/80~exp1&trigger=phpunit/9.5.4-1&trigger=pdepend/2.9.1-1 [12:08] thank you, slyon! \o/ [12:08] done! [12:08] lovely, thank you! [12:09] yw [15:15] sil2100, hi! [15:16] sil2100, python3-flake8 in focal-proposed is broken (uninstallable) and preventing packages build-depending on it from building [15:17] it has been stuck in proposed for almost 300 days now [15:17] related bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/1883175 [15:17] Launchpad bug 1883175 in python-flake8 (Ubuntu Focal) "Missing code linter support for python3.8 language features" [Low, Fix Committed] [15:17] do you think it can be just pulled from focal-proposed at this point? [15:23] paride: can you mark it as verification-failed-focal ? [15:23] It will then be considered for removal and I can remove it [15:23] sil2100, done === ejat is now known as fenris === fenris is now known as ejat === ejat is now known as fenris [18:57] Hi sarnold, Wondering if I can consider the apparmor part of bug #1928360 assigned to you. Also, do you think it is as easy as (almost) copying the fcitx 4 abstractions, or is there more into it? [18:58] Bug 1928360 in Ubuntu Kylin "Switch to Fcitx 5 for Chinese" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1928360 [19:01] GunnarHj: I don't know nearly enough about what's going on there to take ownership of it at this point :( [19:04] sarnold: Then who does? I don't know enough about apparmor and snaps to play around on my own. [19:06] GunnarHj: maybe it's time to engage the snappy team? [19:07] sarnold: That may be an option, yes. It's often unclear to me who is responsible for what when it comes to these things. ;) [19:08] GunnarHj: tell me about it :( [19:09] haha [19:09] GunnarHj: jamie would have been perfect for this, he was really good at most of these, and only fcitx would have been new to him, but alas he's found greener pastures [19:10] sarnold: Right, I see he did most of the input method related apparmor work in the past. [19:24] sarnold: Your mentioning of Jamie's absence makes me think about another loose input method related end. Thinking about bug #1890905. Is that something for the apparmor team? [19:24] Bug 1890905 in snapd (Ubuntu) "Snaps cannot access IBus when $XDG_CACHE_HOME is set" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1890905 [19:25] GunnarHj: no, that'll be snap [19:29] sarnold: Are you sure? After all but #1423890 seems to very closely related. [19:29] bug #1423890 [19:29] Bug 1423890 in apparmor (Ubuntu) "AppArmor support for the XDG Base Directory spec is incomplete" [Wishlist, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1423890 [20:34] GunnarHj: I don't think snap would just magically get ibus access or other xdg stuff correct if apparmor had a better XDG story; it probably would help with a clean implementation, but actually addressing 1890905 would require time investment from snap folks [21:14] sarnold: Ok, thanks, I know too little to argue. Will try to call the snap devs' attention to these issues. [21:15] GunnarHj: it's less 'argue' and more 'there's no way the apparmor team has time for this'.. [21:15] sarnold: I see. :(