| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squashfs-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [1:4.3-6ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:4.3-6ubuntu0.18.04.2] (core) | 01:34 | |
| === stgraber is now known as stgraber_ | ||
| === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (hirsute-proposed/main) [16.2.1-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 16.2.4-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 05:21 | |
| jamespage | morning - the ceph upload above for hirsute ^^ is another set of security updates to complement the ones already in the queue for focal and groovy | 06:17 |
|---|---|---|
| jamespage | the 16.2.1 release in proposed has completed verification yesterday and today (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925322) | 06:17 |
| ubot3 | Launchpad bug 1925322 in ceph (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] ceph 16.2.1" [High, Fix Committed] | 06:18 |
| jamespage | so is ready to be released | 06:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:21.04.12] | 07:22 | |
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-wsl-integration [amd64] (impish-proposed) [0.31.1] | 07:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-wsl-integration [arm64] (impish-proposed) [0.31.1] | 07:37 | |
| icey | hey - an invalid change to nfs-ganesha was proposed to groovy and hirsute as part of resolving functiolnal and build failures in focal+, there is a new upload in unapproved for both that reverts the change (as well as picking up the rest of the proposed fixes) since 14 May; given that the bug target was invalid for Groovy and Hirsute, I've removed those series from the original bug (can re-add if necessary, and mark invalid maybe?) but would | 08:42 |
| icey | appreciate getting those accepted into proposed so I can work my way through verifying that the nfs-ganesha package now works as expected :) | 08:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-photos [amd64] (impish-proposed) [3.38.0-3] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-photos [armhf] (impish-proposed) [3.38.0-3] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-photos [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [3.38.0-3] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php-http-interop-http-factory-tests [amd64] (impish-proposed) [0.9.0-1build1] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-photos [arm64] (impish-proposed) [3.38.0-3] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-photos [s390x] (impish-proposed) [3.38.0-3] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-photos [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [3.38.0-3] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: konversation (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.5-3ubuntu2 => 1.7.5-3ubuntu2.20.04.1] (kubuntu) | 10:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: konversation (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.7.5-3ubuntu2 => 1.7.5-3ubuntu2.20.10.1] (kubuntu) | 10:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: konversation (hirsute-proposed/universe) [20.12.3-0ubuntu1 => 20.12.3-0ubuntu1.1] (kubuntu) | 10:02 | |
| RikMills | sil2100: ^^ SRU's to take care of the move of #kubuntu etc to libera.chat | 10:03 |
| sil2100 | o/ On it in a bit! | 10:04 |
| RikMills | ty :) | 10:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted konversation [source] (hirsute-proposed) [20.12.3-0ubuntu1.1] | 10:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted konversation [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.7.5-3ubuntu2.20.10.1] | 10:07 | |
| sil2100 | RikMills: ok, so I accepted groovy and hirsute already, but I guess I see in groovy and focal that the port seems to be 8001 instead of 6697 | 10:14 |
| sil2100 | I mean, that was the value for the previous versions already, but in hirsute+ I see it was the correct 6697 | 10:14 |
| sil2100 | Is that a problem? Or does that need to be modified as well? | 10:14 |
| RikMills | sil2100: I noticed as well and pondered. then decide to keep the change as minimal as possible. libera works with the 8001 (I did test), but it's just not ssl | 10:16 |
| RikMills | If you think it desirable to make the switch then I could do that | 10:17 |
| RikMills | though I would think that would/could be a separate bug | 10:19 |
| RikMills | sil2100: actually, the older .cpp code does not have a 'server.setSSLEnabled(true)' option, so I am not 100% sure switching the port there in the code would work ok | 10:24 |
| RikMills | so for now in the interests of a prompt fix, I would say go with what we have | 10:24 |
| sil2100 | Ok! | 10:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted konversation [source] (focal-proposed) [1.7.5-3ubuntu2.20.04.1] | 10:37 | |
| RikMills | sil2100: thanks. the 7 days starting today is great | 10:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-wsl-oobe (impish-proposed/primary) [0.1.16] | 10:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:14.2-1ubuntu1 => 1:14.2-2ubuntu1.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 10:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.22] | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.12] | 11:21 | |
| doko | should a test marked as flaky be interpreted as a regression even if test dependencies fail to install? see debos | 11:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.694.6] | 11:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pulseaudio [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:14.2-2ubuntu1.1] | 11:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:14.2-1ubuntu1 => 1:14.2-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 11:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.10 => 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.11] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | 11:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.7 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.8] (no packageset) | 11:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.23] | 11:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-wsl-oobe [source] (impish-proposed) [0.1.16] | 11:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.54] | 12:04 | |
| jibel | sil2100, thanks for the SRUs of AD. There is also golang 1.16 in NEW for focal. The only diff with impish is the version of debhelper | 13:05 |
| sil2100 | jibel: o/ | 13:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-12 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 13:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-12 [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 13:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-12 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 13:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-12 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 13:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-12 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 13:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-12 [i386] (focal-proposed) [1:12.0.0-3ubuntu1~20.04.1] | 13:53 | |
| sil2100 | jibel: ok, looks sane | 13:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] | 13:55 | |
| jibel | sil2100, Thanks | 13:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-wsl-oobe [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [0.1.17] (no packageset) | 14:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-wsl-oobe [arm64] (impish-proposed/universe) [0.1.17] (no packageset) | 14:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset) | 14:07 | |
| didrocks | seb128: ubuntu-wsl-oobe ^ FYI | 14:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset) | 14:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset) | 14:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset) | 14:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.16 [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] (no packageset) | 14:18 | |
| seb128 | didrocks, ack | 14:23 |
| rbasak | In Launchpad, the precise distro_series is still listed as "active". However, it doesn't appear in apt any more at http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/. | 14:27 |
| rbasak | This is breaking git-ubuntu, which uses the active series list from Launchpad to decide what apt suites exist. | 14:27 |
| rbasak | Did someone move precise to old-releases recently? | 14:27 |
| rbasak | If so, shouldn't the Launchpad series be changed to match? | 14:27 |
| rbasak | ubuntu-archive: ^ | 14:30 |
| rbasak | In [7]: lp.load('https://api.launchpad.net/devel/ubuntu/precise').status | 14:30 |
| rbasak | Out[7]: 'Supported' | 14:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-wsl-oobe [amd64] (impish-proposed) [0.1.17] | 14:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-wsl-oobe [arm64] (impish-proposed) [0.1.17] | 14:36 | |
| seb128 | cjwatson, ^ | 14:38 |
| cjwatson | It's not really up to us, this is all in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EndOfLifeProcess | 14:38 |
| cjwatson | If somebody only did like half the process, then maybe they shouldn't have done that ;-) | 14:39 |
| cjwatson | But whoever it was didn't consult with us | 14:39 |
| cjwatson | I think this is one of those things that has got worse since infinity stopped handling it :-( | 14:41 |
| cjwatson | But it *should* pretty much all be documented | 14:41 |
| rbasak | Incidentally, I wondered if I might have the appropriate button (not that I'd press it without an ack from someone appropriate), but I couldn't find an API method. And https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise gives me OOPS-3a6747846d18659364851cc558f00bfa. | 14:42 |
| rbasak | Oh, the status property is just "writeable". | 14:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] | 14:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] | 14:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] | 14:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] | 14:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.16 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.16.2-0ubuntu1~20.04] | 14:48 | |
| cjwatson | https://wiki.canonical.com/InformationInfrastructure/OSA/LPHowTo/ObsoleteDistroSeries needs to be followed before doing that | 14:50 |
| cjwatson | Normally IIRC it involves getting acks from various people first though | 14:51 |
| cjwatson | Bugs in that form are likely pretty much negative priority since it's pretty rarely used :) | 14:51 |
| rbasak | I wonder what I can easily do in git-ubuntu instead. | 14:52 |
| rbasak | Hardcode "don't touch precise" I suppose :) | 14:52 |
| xnox | juliank: so where we are at with grub2 in bionic? cause we are currently failing testing of kernels that kind of have to go out this week. and | 14:53 |
| xnox | we fail our adt-testing, cause we fail to reboot into new kernels sometimes. | 14:53 |
| juliank | xnox: bionic was good always | 14:53 |
| xnox | juliank: hm...... not what I see. | 14:53 |
| xnox | let me check again | 14:53 |
| xnox | juliank: have you removed grubaa64.efi from \efi\boot\ path? | 14:54 |
| juliank | xnox: let me finish my 1:1 | 14:54 |
| xnox | ok | 14:58 |
| xnox | juliank: so stuff like this is not nice at the moment https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/dahdi-linux/bionic/arm64 | 14:58 |
| xnox | which is indicative that we fail to reboot our bionic cloud images. | 14:58 |
| xnox | i guess a rebuilt new bionic cloud image (from fresh) may fix it, as grub2.04 will be in all the places. | 14:59 |
| juliank | xnox: Yes, we can't reboot because qemu is crashing | 14:59 |
| juliank | xnox: Not sure if same issue | 14:59 |
| juliank | xnox: What I meant is I had no concerns about the bionic update | 14:59 |
| xnox | right, but to test bionic kernel SRUs we must reboot into the new kernel. | 15:00 |
| xnox | ie. https://people.canonical.com/~kernel/status/adt-matrix/bionic-linux-meta-snapdragon.html | 15:02 |
| xnox | we have like half a dozen kernels that are missing adt testing on arm64 for bionic. | 15:03 |
| juliank | xnox: but that dahdi things looks like kernel bug, not grub bug, and the grub update we are doing is for the conffile change | 15:05 |
| juliank | xnox: so it should already use 2.04 | 15:05 |
| juliank | xnox: and qemu crashes, I'm not sure if related, but see https://portal.admin.canonical.com/C131118/ | 15:06 |
| juliank | xnox: ah but not all end with "Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000005" | 15:11 |
| xnox | juliank: should i retrigger them all to get fresher results? and failure rates? | 15:11 |
| juliank | xnox: all I can say is that from the grub side, all releases already _are_ on 2.04 | 15:13 |
| juliank | xnox: And the autopkgtest image is built daily with a dist-upgrade | 15:13 |
| xnox | horum | 15:14 |
| juliank | xnox: but there are build failures of those images I can dig into more | 15:15 |
| xnox | juliank: we have a bad cloud then. i thought that arm64 cloud is on | 15:15 |
| xnox | the cloud-archive | 15:15 |
| xnox | aka qemu from later series.... that should be fixed up | 15:15 |
| juliank | xnox: i have no idea, hence opened rt ticket | 15:17 |
| juliank | :D | 15:17 |
| coreycb | python-flake8 is having issues in focal-proposed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/1929841 | 15:17 |
| ubot3 | Launchpad bug 1929841 in python-flake8 (Ubuntu) "python3-flake8 dependency issues in focal-proposed" [Undecided, New] | 15:17 |
| juliank | xnox: I can confirm that our autopkgtest images on bos01 were last built on may 5 for bionic, and may 6 for xenial, and have failed to build since then | 15:17 |
| juliank | xnox: on bos02, all images are current | 15:18 |
| coreycb | I gave arnatious a ping about that in MM ^ (he's not in here) | 15:19 |
| juliank | xnox: so I guess bos01 is a bit weird | 15:19 |
| juliank | xnox: which is also where canonistack is where I got the crash :D | 15:20 |
| juliank | xnox: wondering if I can copy images between cliuds :D | 15:21 |
| xnox | juliank: you can download image and upload it again. | 15:22 |
| xnox | juliank: there is bos02 for arm64 too? can you take out bos01 out of autopkgtest cloud; then i retrigger all the tests; and then we can see if they will all work. | 15:22 |
| xnox | blocking building new kernels for all series, starting like next week. | 15:22 |
| xnox | juliank: if we think only bos01 is affected. | 15:23 |
| xnox | cpaelzer is not here yet. | 15:23 |
| juliank | xnox: one second | 15:23 |
| juliank | xnox: please retry now | 15:26 |
| xnox | juliank: ok. | 15:26 |
| xnox | juliank: loading them up | 15:29 |
| juliank | xnox: I think the dahdi-linux you linked never passed before, fwiw | 15:30 |
| xnox | juliank: sure, but we want to see that we booted with the target kernel we asked; and attempt the test; to see in the logs that we have at least tried to run it against the new kernel. | 15:30 |
| xnox | otherwise the kernel team automation says "you didn't even give it a chance" | 15:30 |
| juliank | heh | 15:31 |
| xnox | the kernel team's adt-matrix is more strict then pure britney | 15:31 |
| coreycb | sil2100: hi, I wonder if we should consider reverting the changes for this: 1883175 | 15:35 |
| coreycb | bug 1883175 | 15:35 |
| coreycb | https://pad.lv/1883175 | 15:36 |
| juliank | xnox: I might have to move your tests into the huge queues, given the number | 15:36 |
| xnox | :- | 15:37 |
| xnox | :-( | 15:37 |
| xnox | juliank: it's just _some_ kernels | 15:37 |
| juliank | xnox: atm it's ok either way :) | 15:37 |
| xnox | juliank: i need to improve kernel's team tooling to kind of like call the retry-autopkgtest stuff and/or like share flags for it. | 15:37 |
| juliank | Note that we operate at 12 out of of 36 workers now | 15:38 |
| juliank | it's going to be slow | 15:38 |
| xnox | juliank: as long as we get results.... | 15:39 |
| juliank | it's weekend soon, so :D | 15:39 |
| sil2100 | coreycb: hah! paride just poked about this on -devel, I'll be removing the SRU from -proposed after my meeting (soon) | 15:39 |
| juliank | also US is out on Monday, so :D:D | 15:40 |
| xnox | UK too | 15:40 |
| sil2100 | coreycb: I think it's fine to revert the change later on | 15:40 |
| juliank | We can fill up the queues like mad people | 15:40 |
| coreycb | sil2100: awesome! ty, I should have checked over there. | 15:40 |
| juliank | xnox: fascinating | 15:40 |
| juliank | xnox: /me also needs to do a week of digital detox next week | 15:40 |
| xnox | juliank: so stock bionic arm64 images have grub in removable path ; and in ubuntu path and that's it. | 16:11 |
| xnox | juliank: i guess they must update both paths, do they? | 16:11 |
| juliank | xnox: yes, they do | 16:11 |
| xnox | juliank: great. | 16:12 |
| juliank | xnox: bionic made extra-removable the default, changing the option from --force-extra-removable to --no-extra-removable | 16:12 |
| juliank | well sometime between xenial and bionic :D | 16:12 |
| xnox | great. | 16:12 |
| juliank | xnox: we can also fix that in xenial autopkgtest image by setting --force-extra-removable option there for those ESM things | 16:15 |
| juliank | I need to go eat dinner any minute now, though, and eod | 16:16 |
| juliank | I'm sooo tired | 16:16 |
| juliank | Maybe it's hay fever :D | 16:16 |
| xnox | maybe it's covid | 16:22 |
| xnox | =/ just in case. test? | 16:22 |
| xnox | juliank: such a xenial image fix would be nice in adt; but also for our xenial arm64 images too which we still need to build "the last one" | 16:24 |
| xnox | and the xenial aws image we build | 16:25 |
| xnox | arm64 | 16:25 |
| juliank | xnox: nah, it's not unnormal for me to be half dead between 4 and 8 pm | 16:38 |
| juliank | xnox: yeah we could set the right debconf in final xenial image too | 16:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (groovy-proposed/main) [246.6-1ubuntu1.3 => 246.6-1ubuntu1.4] (core, i386-whitelist) | 16:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (focal-proposed/main) [245.4-4ubuntu3.6 => 245.4-4ubuntu3.7] (core, i386-whitelist) | 16:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.47 => 237-3ubuntu10.48] (core) | 16:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (hirsute-proposed/main) [247.3-3ubuntu3 => 247.3-3ubuntu3.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 17:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.3.1-0ubuntu1.1 => 2:16.3.2-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 20:02 | |
| === ossurayynot is now known as tonyyarusso | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:21.04.10 => 1:21.04.11] (core) | 20:16 | |
| coreycb | hello SRU team, we have a high impact bug for neutron in the focal queue if someone can take a look. | 20:22 |
| bdmurray | coreycb: I'm your huckelberry | 20:24 |
| bdmurray | your bad typing one but still | 20:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.3.2-0ubuntu1] | 20:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.6 => 1:20.10.7] (core) | 20:33 | |
| Eickmeyer | SRU Team: Still waiting on an ack for bug 1928146. | 20:35 |
| ubot3 | Bug 1928146 in nvidia-modprobe (Ubuntu Hirsute) "Please SRU nvidia-modprobe 465.24" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1928146 | 20:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.3.2-0ubuntu2] | 20:36 | |
| juliank | xnox: sorry, the bos01 workers restarted, I now disabled them in mojo | 20:38 |
| juliank | xnox: i think dahdi-linux looked better now | 20:40 |
| juliank | I'm off until the monday after next week | 20:40 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: lol thank you | 20:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.7 => 1:20.04.10.8] (core) | 20:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.11.13 => 1:18.04.11.14] (core) | 21:23 | |
| xnox | juliank: yes, but not everywhere. | 22:44 |
| xnox | so over at https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/dahdi-linux/bionic/arm64 | 22:45 |
| xnox | the linux-meta/4.15.0.144.131 result is bad, and not because the module failed to build. | 22:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!