=== popey4 is now known as popey
[02:34] <lotuspsychje> good morning
[02:36] <Ussat> O/
[02:36] <lotuspsychje> hey Ussat 
[03:25] <lotuspsychje> we have some crew here on Popos! gbit86 
[03:25] <gbit86> So is it ok for me to upload a screenshot of some UI improvements I have made to my Pop!_OS install in here?
[03:26] <lotuspsychje> sure mate, i love user screens
[03:26] <gbit86> Guess I'd be interested to know if anyone likes what I have done lol.
[03:26] <gbit86> https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/reZHqT1n/VirtualBox_Pop%20OS%21%2020.04_29_05_2021_21_56_24.png
[03:27] <lotuspsychje> xfce ontop popos?
[03:28] <gbit86> It is still running Gnome3 or Gnome-Shell underneath and from what I know of the process I think I can apply it to Gnome4 as well.. basically running Xfce4 w/ Gnome-Shell but hiding the top menu bar in gnome-shell 😂.
[03:28] <gbit86> That's really how I want it as well.. I want the modern benefits of Gnome-shell without their top menubar.
[03:29] <gbit86> They constantly break any and all attempts to add in a global menu.. xfce4 doesn't so it only makes sense to just do away with the menu bar completely and disable any notification related stuff that would cause a conflict.
[03:30] <lotuspsychje> cool
[03:32] <gbit86> I probably should look at doing the same with Gnome 40 next..
[03:45] <lotuspsychje> gbit86: this is how my box looks like https://imgur.com/a/91CnTwB
[03:46] <gbit86> Ah nice, reminds me of chrome or ensoOS a bit
=== ivo_cavalcante is now known as IvoCavalcante
=== IvoCavalcante is now known as Dante
=== Dante is now known as Dantinho
=== Dantinho is now known as ivo_cavalcante
=== ivo_cavalcante is now known as IvoCavalcante
=== IvoCavalcante is now known as ivo_cavalcante
=== ivo_cavalcante is now known as IvoCavalcante
=== IvoCavalcante is now known as ivo_cavalcante
=== IvoCavalcante is now known as ivo_cavalcante
=== ivo_cavalcante is now known as Dantinho
=== Dantinho is now known as IvoCavalcante
[18:33] <daftykins> bah turns out i can't use NFS from the Synology's share, because it's one where i'm using encryption
[19:08] <jeremy31> So does the arch chat have a log?
[20:10] <daftykins> hey hey, i got around my problem by ditching samba multiuser and instead trying out autofs
[20:11] <daftykins> each user has a directory in their ~ still, symlinked to a samba share mount in ~ but it's auto mounted by autofs now 
[20:12] <daftykins> it even works inside the web application without the user needing to SSH in first