=== doko_ is now known as doko === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [14:31] cpaelzer, ddstreet, jamespage, didrocks: MIR team meeting [14:31] good morning [14:34] so, looks like last week :-/ [14:34] o/ [14:36] #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status [14:36] Meeting started at 14:36:44 UTC. The chair is doko. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [14:36] Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick [14:36] #topic Review of previous action items [14:37] we didn't have the meeting at all last week, so skipping [14:37] #topic current component mismatches [14:37] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg [14:37] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg [14:38] * sarnold gives his customary weekly ack to cpaelzer about backuppc [14:38] sarnold, status of backupppc related security reviews? [14:38] I don't remember seeing the libayatana-appindacator thing [14:38] doko: not yet started [14:39] ayatana looks incomplete, 2/3 packages done. maybe ping didrocks? [14:39] jamespage, can you review the cherrypy related ones, or should we split these? [14:40] mesa is still pending. I email didrocks two weeks ago. no reply yet [14:41] I'm around - sorry [14:41] ipmitool is oldish, but shows up in mismatches ... waiting on cpaelzer for that [14:41] thanks for backuppc @sarnold [14:42] IIRC ipmitool is from MAAS for MAAS [14:42] and no one ever cared about it [14:42] [Reverse-Depends: Ubuntu.Impish supported-maas seed] [14:42] yes [14:42] jamespage, fence-agents has been in main before. is it supposed to re-enter? [14:42] fence-agents comes from us I guess doko [14:42] as part of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1927004 [14:42] yeah, we've had a discussion on the bug about the right names to use for the binary package that'll have agents we want to support [14:42] waiting for security atm [14:43] if we don't care about ipmitool, then maybe it should be seeded in the community-maas seed [14:43] who can confirm this? [14:44] Adam I guess [14:45] Collard [14:45] I hope that wasn't misspelled ... [14:45] I'll chase this with xnox [14:45] I think he set these seeds initially [14:46] freeipmi is in main, ipmitool and openimpi are not [14:46] unfortunately HW manaufacturers seem to be unable to settle on one [14:46] heh I didn't realize we had three of the things [14:46] we might end up taking it in in additon to the one we have, but these changes [14:47] seed changes I mean [14:47] that it is worth to start with a clarification [14:48] hmm, openimpi also looks to be in main [14:48] sarnold: oh your are right, agreed [14:49] so maybe we really have to take the third one in to make it a charm :-) [14:49] hah [14:49] or is it 'operator' now.. [14:49] other than the expected fight of who will own this I see no problem [14:49] and starting with xnox to calrify the intend doesn't sound like a bad start [14:50] thanks doko for offering to chase this down [14:52] I don't want to create actions for people not being present ... didn't work well last time [14:52] hehe [14:52] FYI I have reviewed prips which came in yesterday [14:53] and I have updated the status on a few to get them moving forward [14:53] but nothing that would be a new team todo [14:53] #topic New MIRs [14:53] shall we look at th ebug lists now? [14:53] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:54] That scary list is actually two [14:54] let us start with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libftdi1/+bug/1912371 [14:54] oh hey and one of them is even good news :) [14:54] doko: in the update between commend 8 and 9 [14:55] doko: did you have a look and acked it assinging it to security? [14:55] that wasn't clear to me looking at the bug this morning [14:55] if you have, then this is ready to go [14:55] if it was a mistake then we need to assign someoen for a MIR review [14:56] essentially William self-reviewed in commen 8 :-) [14:56] what's the libftdi and libftdi1 change amurray made in comment 16? [14:56] so your update could be seen as sign-off and Ack on that [14:56] ok, I'll chase this down as well, probably just needs a seed [14:56] sarnold: If I read correctly there is a debdiff that shall be applöied before promotion [14:57] yep, the symbols file should be fixed [14:58] I'll chase this down [14:58] thanks [14:58] let us go to the bigger chunks of work now https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jaraco.classes/+bug/1930111 [14:58] 8 potentially easy python lib review tasks to assign [14:58] yep, already asked before. should we split this, or load it on jamespage? ;) [14:59] but the question upfront, who will own this? [14:59] Is that from openstack? [14:59] yes, openstack [14:59] I'd say we assign him and he can call out to us if needed [15:00] as he knows how this works even if he has no time to do it himself [15:00] python3-cherrypy3 | cherrypy3 | ceph-mgr | Ubuntu Developers | 228656 | 1181 [15:00] from germinate so yes indeed from openstack [15:01] I've added an update and assigned jamespage to one of them [15:01] now it shoudl be clear [15:01] is that ok for everyone atm? [15:02] I'm slightly skeptical the world needs yet another "high performance python webserver", it feels like one of the other existing webservers ought to work.. [15:02] but perhaps that's not one to solve at this meeting [15:03] I agree [15:03] to both [15:07] ok [15:07] next ... [15:07] #topic Incomplete bugs / questions [15:07] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [15:08] hmm, "new cherrypy3 18.6.0-1 release" .. we've got 8.9.1-8 packaged now.. this might be a big jump, heh [15:08] or just a rename [15:08] versions are smoke and mirrors [15:08] I guess there is only https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ledmon/+bug/1794219 in this list to talk about [15:09] doko: this one seems that sil2100 decided to help sorting that out [15:09] doko: does tha answer we got from rex tsai satisfy that for foundations to go on? [15:10] ok, I'll take this [15:11] thanks ++ [15:11] #topic Any other business? [15:11] not from me [15:12] none from me [15:12] ok, finished! [15:12] #endmeeting [15:12] Meeting ended at 15:12:14 UTC. Minutes at https://new.ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2021/ubuntu-meeting.2021-06-01-14.36.moin.txt [15:12] thanks doko, all :) [17:12] doko: cpaelzer: so the community-maas seed thing, i failed to make the reports exclude particular seeds. [17:12] my first two attempts failed to make that work. Ideally, --exclude of it from missmatches reports should suffice. [19:00] o/ [19:01] mdeslaur, vorlon: here? [19:01] o/ [19:01] I don't see sil2100 or cyphermox in this channel. [19:10] rbasak: well, better luck next time I guess [19:11] * mdeslaur -> away === genii-core is now known as genii