[14:31] <doko> cpaelzer, ddstreet, jamespage, didrocks: MIR team meeting
[14:31] <sarnold> good morning
[14:34] <doko> so, looks like last week :-/
[14:34] <ddstreet> o/
[14:36] <doko> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
[14:36] <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:36:44 UTC.  The chair is doko.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[14:36] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[14:36] <doko> #topic Review of previous action items
[14:37] <doko> we didn't have the meeting at all last week, so skipping
[14:37] <doko> #topic current component mismatches
[14:37] <doko> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[14:37] <doko> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
[14:38]  * sarnold gives his customary weekly ack to cpaelzer about backuppc
[14:38] <doko> sarnold, status of backupppc related security reviews?
[14:38] <sarnold> I don't remember seeing the libayatana-appindacator thing
[14:38] <sarnold> doko: not yet started
[14:39] <doko> ayatana looks incomplete, 2/3 packages done. maybe ping didrocks?
[14:39] <doko> jamespage, can you review the cherrypy related ones, or should we split these?
[14:40] <doko> mesa is still pending. I email didrocks two weeks ago. no reply yet
[14:41] <cpaelzer> I'm around - sorry
[14:41] <doko> ipmitool is oldish, but shows up in mismatches ... waiting on cpaelzer for that
[14:41] <cpaelzer> thanks for backuppc @sarnold
[14:42] <cpaelzer> IIRC ipmitool is from MAAS for MAAS
[14:42] <cpaelzer> and no one ever cared about it
[14:42] <cpaelzer> [Reverse-Depends: Ubuntu.Impish supported-maas seed]
[14:42] <cpaelzer> yes
[14:42] <doko> jamespage, fence-agents has been in main before. is it supposed to re-enter?
[14:42] <cpaelzer> fence-agents comes from us I guess doko
[14:42] <cpaelzer> as part of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1927004
[14:42] <sarnold> yeah, we've had a discussion on the bug about the right names to use for the binary package that'll have agents we want to support
[14:42] <cpaelzer> waiting for security atm
[14:43] <doko> if we don't care about ipmitool, then maybe it should be seeded in the community-maas seed
[14:43] <doko> who can confirm this?
[14:44] <cpaelzer> Adam I guess
[14:45] <cpaelzer> Collard
[14:45] <cpaelzer> I hope that wasn't misspelled ...
[14:45] <doko> I'll chase this with xnox
[14:45] <doko> I think he set these seeds initially
[14:46] <cpaelzer> freeipmi is in main, ipmitool and openimpi are not
[14:46] <cpaelzer> unfortunately HW manaufacturers seem to be unable to settle on one
[14:46] <sarnold> heh I didn't realize we had three of the things
[14:46] <cpaelzer> we might end up taking it in in additon to the one we have, but these changes
[14:47] <cpaelzer> seed changes I mean
[14:47] <cpaelzer> that it is worth to start with a clarification
[14:48] <sarnold> hmm, openimpi also looks to be in main
[14:48] <cpaelzer> sarnold: oh your are right, agreed
[14:49] <cpaelzer> so maybe we really have to take the third one in to make it a charm :-)
[14:49] <sarnold> hah
[14:49] <sarnold> or is it 'operator' now..
[14:49] <cpaelzer> other than the expected fight of who will own this I see no problem
[14:49] <cpaelzer> and starting with xnox to calrify the intend doesn't sound like a bad start
[14:50] <cpaelzer> thanks doko for offering to chase this down
[14:52] <doko> I don't want to create actions for people not being present ... didn't work well last time
[14:52] <cpaelzer> hehe
[14:52] <cpaelzer> FYI I have reviewed prips which came in yesterday
[14:53] <cpaelzer> and I have updated the status on a few to get them moving forward
[14:53] <cpaelzer> but nothing that would be a new team todo
[14:53] <doko> #topic New MIRs
[14:53] <cpaelzer> shall we look at th ebug lists now?
[14:53] <doko> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:54] <cpaelzer> That scary list is actually two
[14:54] <cpaelzer> let us start with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libftdi1/+bug/1912371
[14:54] <sarnold> oh hey and one of them is even good news :)
[14:54] <cpaelzer> doko: in the update between commend 8 and 9
[14:55] <cpaelzer> doko: did you have a look and acked it assinging it to security?
[14:55] <cpaelzer> that wasn't clear to me looking at the bug this morning
[14:55] <cpaelzer> if you have, then this is ready to go
[14:55] <cpaelzer> if it was a mistake then we need to assign someoen for a MIR review
[14:56] <cpaelzer> essentially William self-reviewed in commen 8 :-)
[14:56] <sarnold> what's the libftdi and libftdi1 change amurray made in comment 16?
[14:56] <cpaelzer> so your update could be seen as sign-off and Ack on that
[14:56] <doko> ok, I'll chase this down as well, probably just needs a seed
[14:56] <cpaelzer> sarnold: If I read correctly there is a debdiff that shall be applöied before promotion
[14:57] <doko> yep, the symbols file should be fixed
[14:58] <doko> I'll chase this down
[14:58] <cpaelzer> thanks
[14:58] <cpaelzer> let us go to the bigger chunks of work now https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jaraco.classes/+bug/1930111
[14:58] <cpaelzer> 8 potentially easy python lib review tasks to assign
[14:58] <doko> yep, already asked before. should we split this, or load it on jamespage? ;)
[14:59] <cpaelzer> but the question upfront, who will own this?
[14:59] <cpaelzer> Is that from openstack?
[14:59] <doko> yes, openstack
[14:59] <cpaelzer> I'd say we assign him and he can call out to us if needed
[15:00] <cpaelzer> as he knows how this works even if he has no time to do it himself
[15:00] <cpaelzer> python3-cherrypy3                                         | cherrypy3                              | ceph-mgr                                          | Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>      |          228656 |            1181
[15:00] <cpaelzer> from germinate so yes indeed from openstack
[15:01] <cpaelzer> I've added an update and assigned jamespage to one of them
[15:01] <cpaelzer> now it shoudl be clear
[15:01] <cpaelzer> is that ok for everyone atm?
[15:02] <sarnold> I'm slightly skeptical the world needs yet another "high performance python webserver", it feels like one of the other existing webservers ought to work..
[15:02] <sarnold> but perhaps that's not one to solve at this meeting
[15:03] <cpaelzer> I agree
[15:03] <cpaelzer> to both
[15:07] <cpaelzer> ok
[15:07] <cpaelzer> next ...
[15:07] <doko> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
[15:07] <doko> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[15:08] <sarnold> hmm, "new cherrypy3 18.6.0-1 release" .. we've got 8.9.1-8 packaged now.. this might be a big jump, heh
[15:08] <cpaelzer> or just a rename
[15:08] <cpaelzer> versions are smoke and mirrors
[15:08] <cpaelzer> I guess there is only https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ledmon/+bug/1794219 in this list to talk about
[15:09] <cpaelzer> doko: this one seems that sil2100 decided to help sorting that out
[15:09] <cpaelzer> doko: does tha answer we got from rex tsai satisfy that for foundations to go on?
[15:10] <doko> ok, I'll take this
[15:11] <cpaelzer> thanks ++
[15:11] <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
[15:11] <cpaelzer> not from me
[15:12] <sarnold> none from me
[15:12] <doko> ok, finished!
[15:12] <doko> #endmeeting
[15:12] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 15:12:14 UTC.  Minutes at https://new.ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2021/ubuntu-meeting.2021-06-01-14.36.moin.txt
[15:12] <sarnold> thanks doko, all :)
[17:12] <xnox> doko:  cpaelzer: so the community-maas seed thing, i failed to make the reports exclude particular seeds.
[17:12] <xnox> my first two attempts failed to make that work. Ideally,  --exclude of it from missmatches reports should suffice.
[19:00] <rbasak> o/
[19:01] <rbasak> mdeslaur, vorlon: here?
[19:01] <mdeslaur> o/
[19:01] <rbasak> I don't see sil2100 or cyphermox in this channel.
[19:10] <mdeslaur> rbasak: well, better luck next time I guess
[19:11]  * mdeslaur -> away