=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (focal-proposed/main) [2.2.3-3ubuntu0.4 => 2.2.3-3ubuntu0.5] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
=== Ukikie_ is now known as Ukikie
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vitis-ai [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.2-0ubuntu5~20.04.1]
[13:50] <icey> hey, the point release for Neutron has been verified in Focal for a week now, it would be great if we could get that released
[13:51] <icey> https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1927976
[13:51] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1927976 in neutron (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] Ussuri stable releases" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (bionic-proposed) [12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.8]
=== rharper_ is now known as rharper
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oslo.messaging [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.35.0-0ubuntu4]
[14:32] <ricotz> sil2100, hi :), if you have a moment then please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1928642
[14:32] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1928642 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Groovy) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.0.6 for groovy" [High, Fix Committed]
[14:34] <kanashiro> vorlon, re golang-github-containerd-containerd-dev in Focal and Bionic: I am still puzzled about this, I just launched a new focal container and if I update it and search for containerd I get `containerd/focal-updates,focal-security 1.3.3-0ubuntu2.3 amd64` and not version `1.4.4-0ubuntu1~20.04.2` which contains the missing binary package in the autopkgtest output
[14:36] <kanashiro> if I go to the containerd LP page and click on version `1.4.4-0ubuntu1~20.04.2` I get "Note: Some binary packages for this source are not yet published in the repository."
[14:37] <lucasmoura> Hi sil2100, we have a SRU ready for ubuntu-advantage-tools: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1929597
[14:37] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1929597 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Impish) "[SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.0.2 -> 27.1) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Groovy, Hirsute" [Undecided, New]
[14:38] <lucasmoura> Let me know if there is anything else I need to provide you for this SRU
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.2.3-3ubuntu0.5]
[14:56] <vorlon> kanashiro: fwiw golang-github-containerd-containerd-dev was not published on any architecture in bionic-updates; there was some sort of publisher error that caused the amd64 build to not have been published /at all/ to updates (and amd64 autopkgtest also failed but with a different error).  I've re-published now and the binaries are there
[14:56] <vorlon> kanashiro: I haven't looked yet if focal has the same issue
[14:57] <vorlon> kanashiro: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/amd64/golang-github-containerd-containerd-dev as well shows it did not get published to -updates; all very srange
[14:58] <vorlon> kanashiro: (my name shows on the page because I processed the deletions of already-published SRUs; I don't believe I was the one who released the SRUs so can't speak to why it broke)
[14:58] <kanashiro> vorlon, thanks for taking care of this publishing issue, and yes, very strange
[15:12] <sil2100> lucasmoura: hey! Commented on the bugs, could you take a look and follow up there?
[15:33] <jibel> could someone release gnome-shell from focal-proposed and review/approve the version in unapproved?
[15:59] <ricotz> sil2100, thank you \o/
[16:05] <lucasmoura_> sil2100, sorry, which bug did you comment on ? I have looked at the main SRU bug and the related ones but I can't see your comments there :(
[16:06] <lucasmoura_> sorry for the noise sil2100, just received an email about your comments.
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:21.04.12 => 1:21.04.13] (core)
[18:32] <bdmurray> Is there an AA about?
[19:50] <vorlon> bdmurray: the one that just answered your email is about now
[19:52] <vorlon> bdmurray: hmm somehow your u-r-u upload has no debdiff in the queue
[19:55] <bdmurray> vorlon: thanks you took care of my AA issue. I'll look at u-r-u now.
[19:56] <vorlon> bdmurray: well I'm downloading and diffing locally anyway
[19:56] <bdmurray> vorlon: alright, because I wouldn't know what else to say!
[19:59] <vorlon> bdmurray: should we fix the u-r-u tests in the future to use distro-info instead of hard-coding a release?
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:21.04.13]
[20:01] <bdmurray> vorlon: I did for impish
[20:01] <bdmurray> Or maybe that was update-manager
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.54 => 2.525.55] (desktop-core)
[20:05] <bdmurray> Yeah, that was update-manager
[20:19] <vorlon> sbeattie: what are the conditions for considering LP: #1917509 "fixed"?  As this bug has not been referenced in any of the SRU changelogs
[20:19] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1917509 in grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu) "Call for testing: grub2 security updates" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917509
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (bionic-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu44.1.1 => 2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2] (no packageset)
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.167~18.04.4 => 1.167~18.04.5] (core)
[20:31] <vorlon> bdmurray: sil2100 is EOD, could you have a look at grub2-{un,}signed in xenial+bionic queues?
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.167~16.04.5 => 1.167~16.04.6] (core)
[20:38] <bdmurray> vorlon: yes
[20:44] <bdmurray> I imagine if LP didn't produce diffs for u-r-u then it won't for this
[20:46] <vorlon> heh perhaps not
[20:54] <cjwatson> vorlon: I think the queue is stuck.  Let me check with IS ...
[20:56] <cjwatson> Yeah, got stuck on 2021-06-04 apparently, I've asked for an appropriately-shaped guided missile
[20:57] <bdmurray> vorlon: The bionic grub2-unsigned version dep is on the grub2-common version from xenial is that right?
[20:57] <bdmurray> s/is on/is >=/
[20:59] <cjwatson> debdiff queue is catching up now
[21:01] <bdmurray> thanks!
[21:52] <vorlon> bdmurray: yes - because in bionic, grub2 (grub2-common / grub-install) was already new enough to have support for the arm64 relocations without having to be SRUed, therefore >= $xenial_updates is sufficient for bionic also
[22:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.167~18.04.5]
[22:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2]
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.167~16.04.6]
[22:30] <bdmurray> vorlon: all accepted
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (bionic-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2 => 2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2] (no packageset)
[22:46] <vorlon> bdmurray: ta
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2]
[23:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (bionic-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2 => 2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2]
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (focal-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu44.2 => 2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-unsigned [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-unsigned (xenial-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu44.1.1 => 2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [sync] (xenial-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu44.1.2]