=== genii is now known as genii-core
[14:18] <bittin> good afternoon :)
[14:29] <cpaelzer> hi
[14:29] <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
[14:29] <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:29:43 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
[14:29] <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
[14:29] <sarnold> good morning
[14:30] <cpaelzer> ping didrocks sarnold jamespage doko ddstreet - MIR Meeting
[14:30] <cpaelzer> hi sarnold
[14:30] <ddstreet> o/
[14:30] <sarnold> hey cpaelzer, ddstreet, bittin :)
[14:30] <didrocks> hey o/ (in a meeting, but will try to follow)
[14:30] <cpaelzer> thanks for the FYI, we will talk CAPSLOCK to yell over that other meeting then :-)
[14:31] <cpaelzer> #topic Review of previous action items
[14:31] <didrocks> haha
[14:31] <sarnold> hehe
[14:31] <cpaelzer> no actions logged AFAIK
[14:31] <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
[14:31] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
[14:31] <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
[14:31] <cpaelzer> jamespage: might not be here, but he has let me know about cherrypy
[14:32] <sarnold> (no progress on backuppc)
[14:32] <cpaelzer> and as you see plenty of cases already got in a good state
[14:32] <cpaelzer> arr sarnold - I'm supposed to backuppc-annoy you so you do the review - not vice versa
[14:32] <cpaelzer> :-P
[14:32] <sarnold> hhehe
[14:32] <cpaelzer> so as we assumed for cherrypy and depdendencies this is driven by jamespage
[14:32] <cpaelzer> he assumed that two of them might need security review eventually
[14:33] <cpaelzer> but most of them look like trivial and safe python libs
[14:33] <cpaelzer> the other new but expected thing here is pacemakre -> fence-agents
[14:33] <cpaelzer> The problem is in the links, we have multiple MIR bugs for that
[14:33] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/897492 is the old one
[14:33] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 897492 in fence-agents (Ubuntu) "[MIR] fence-agents" [Wishlist, Fix Released]
[14:34] <cpaelzer> But https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1927004 is the new one
[14:34] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1927004 in fence-agents (Ubuntu) "[MIR] fence-agents" [Undecided, New]
[14:34] <sarnold> six digits, old indeed
[14:34] <cpaelzer> so the tool lists that as "approved" but in reality it is waiting on security
[14:34] <bittin> 2011 so pretty old
[14:34] <cpaelzer> It is all good, IMHO the bad coloring/link isn't too bad unless we'd loose the ability to handle things
[14:35] <cpaelzer> OTOH if someone wants to hack som code for component mismatches let us know
[14:35] <cpaelzer> The rest here are all old/known cases or false-positives
[14:35] <cpaelzer> doko: was there feedback on maas->ipmitool ?
[14:36] <cpaelzer> you said you wanted to discuss that with xnox again
[14:36] <cpaelzer> hmm, memory-corruption - or did I already give in and said I'd look at it for server
[14:36]  * cpaelzer checks logs
[14:37] <cpaelzer> I was right, starting with the clarification between doo/xnox was the plan
[14:37] <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
[14:37] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:38] <bittin>  [MIR] flashrom + libftdi
[14:38] <bittin> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashrom/+bug/1912371
[14:38] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1912371 in libftdi1 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] flashrom + libftdi" [Undecided, New]
[14:38] <cpaelzer> yep
[14:38] <jamespage> o/
[14:39] <sarnold> hey jamespage :)
[14:39] <cpaelzer> this (libfdti) was on doko to complete from the meeting on first of june
[14:39] <bittin> jamespage: we talked about wanting status of cherrypi from you?
[14:40] <cpaelzer> I see no update, but unfortunately he didn't show up yet to answer our questions
[14:40] <cpaelzer> I'd keep it with him as it is a foundations topic anyway - he'll pickup the highlight later onw
[14:41] <cpaelzer> jamespage: yeah please feel free to read the backlog above if I said anything wrong abyout cherrypy3
[14:41] <cpaelzer> until then
[14:41] <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
[14:41] <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
[14:41] <jamespage> I think only one will need security review but I also had feedback on the package itself
[14:42] <cpaelzer> thanks for confirming jamespage
[14:42] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ledmon/+bug/1794219 was another one on doko's todo list without an update
[14:42] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1794219 in ledmon (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ledmon" [Undecided, Incomplete]
[14:42] <cpaelzer> sorry doko a lot of old things to highlight you on :-/
[14:43] <cpaelzer> the other oen in incomplete bugs is
[14:43] <cpaelzer> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-cheroot/+bug/1930111
[14:43] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1930111 in python-cheroot (Ubuntu) "[MIR] new dependencies of cherrypy3: jaraco.collections, jaraco.classes, jaraco.text, python-cheroot, python-jaraco.functools, python-tempora, python-portend, zc.lockfile" [Undecided, Incomplete]
[14:43] <cpaelzer> which seems related to the cherrypy3 context
[14:43] <bittin> [Rationale]
[14:43] <bittin> Dependencies of the new cherrypy3 18.6.0-1 release.
[14:43] <cpaelzer> so that is already in the hands of jamespage
[14:43] <bittin> so yeah
[14:44] <cpaelzer> well, it seems today was a meeting with no new tasks then
[14:44] <cpaelzer> \o/
[14:44] <jamespage> hurrah!
[14:44] <bittin> :p
[14:44] <sarnold> huzzah!
[14:44] <cpaelzer> some old ones for jamespage and doko which are all fine to complete until next week
[14:44] <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
[14:44] <cpaelzer> nothig else from me
[14:44] <sarnold> nothing from me
[14:44] <didrocks> nothing either
[14:44] <jamespage> nope
[14:44] <bittin> nope i see GNOME 40.2 trickling in and other things :)
[14:44] <cpaelzer> except maye - @sarnold did you do backuppc since 10 minutes ago
[14:45] <bittin> but don't have anything to discuss
[14:45] <sarnold> cpaelzer: indeed no :) hehe
[14:45] <cpaelzer> yeah bittin; I've seen plenty of mid-sized things in impish-excuse but nothing that seems to explode toward MIR/Main-Inclusion atm
[14:45] <cpaelzer> ok then, thank you all for you time keeping this queue clean and handled fast
[14:46] <bittin> well i think the plan is to package 41 for impish when thats out in September and have that as default
[14:46] <cpaelzer> always good to know bittin
[14:46] <cpaelzer> bittin: would that be worth an entry in https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/impish-indri-release-schedule/18540 ?
[14:47] <cpaelzer> In regard to the MIR Team meeting content I'd close here then ...
[14:47] <sarnold> that sounds ambitious
[14:47] <cpaelzer> #endmeeting
[14:47] <meetingology> Meeting ended at 14:47:30 UTC.  Minutes at https://new.ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2021/ubuntu-meeting.2021-06-08-14.29.moin.txt
[14:47] <sarnold> thanks cpaelzer, all :)
[14:47] <bittin> cpaelzer: good question as i am mostly doing translations and testing and only become an Ubuntu member recently like 3 weeks ago i can't really answer that but that was kenvandine s answer in one of the Ubuntu On Airs on Youtube
[14:47] <cpaelzer> feel free to discuss gnome 41, but that almost is more a #ubuntu-release discussion than here
[14:48] <bittin> well i don't really have much to discuss right now but yeah
[14:48] <cpaelzer> well then thanks for passing that info to us bittin
[14:48] <cpaelzer> have fun everyone!
[14:48] <didrocks> you too!
[14:49] <bittin> same to you all
[14:49] <bittin> cyas
=== howefield is now known as Guest7205
=== genii-core is now known as genii