[04:09] <utkarsh2102> vorlon: hey, are you still around?
[04:21] <utkarsh2102> phpseclib/armhf has already been fixed by the new upload of phpseclib, all that's needed is re-triggers. Will do that now!
[04:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:7.1.3-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 1:7.1.4-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.16-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.22-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.18-1 => 6.1.22-1~ubuntu1.21.04.1] (no packageset)
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.16-1~ubuntu1.20.10.1 => 6.1.22-1~ubuntu1.20.10.1] (no packageset)
[07:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.16-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1 => 6.1.22-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (no packageset)
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.16-dfsg-6ubuntu1.20.04.2 => 6.1.22-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.16-1 => 6.1.22-1~ubuntu1.20.10.1] (no packageset)
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.16-dfsg-6ubuntu1.20.10.1 => 6.1.22-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.10.1] (kernel-dkms)
[07:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.20-1 => 6.1.22-1~ubuntu1.21.04.1] (no packageset)
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-hwe (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.18-dfsg-5ubuntu1.21.04.1 => 6.1.22-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.21.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[07:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (focal-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.16-dfsg-6~ubuntu1.20.04.2 => 6.1.22-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud)
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (hirsute-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.18-dfsg-5 => 6.1.22-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.21.04.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud)
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [6.1.16-dfsg-6~ubuntu1.20.10.1 => 6.1.22-dfsg-1~ubuntu1.20.10.1] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-cloud)
[08:24] <ricotz> sil2100, hello :), I am hoping you will have some time for libreoffice/hirsute which is in the queue now -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1931272
[08:29] <sil2100> ricotz: hey! I might have but in approx 1-2 hours :)
[08:31] <ricotz> sil2100, sounds great :)
[08:32] <sil2100> ricotz: could you re-ping me once I get back online again in that time?
[08:35] <seb128> sil2100, hey, what's the status of fixing impish daily builds due to the zstd thing? are we waiting on that SRU to be installed on the machine, does it need to be moving to updates first?
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (hirsute-proposed/main) [21.0.1-2 => 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (hirsute-proposed) [21.0.3-0ubuntu0.1]
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (hirsute-proposed/main) [21.0.1-2 => 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg)
[08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.12 => 20.04.15.13] (core)
[08:51] <ginggs> laney: thanks for the easy hint for cuda yesterday
[08:52] <juliank> cjwatson: I screwed up a bit and did ./copy-package --from ppa:ubuntu-uefi-team/ubuntu/ppa -s hirsute --to-suite impish-proposed shim --to ubuntu *without* the -b; I do need the binaries from there copied though - I cancelled the builds in the archive
[08:52] <juliank> cjwatson: I can't rebuild it because that would change the hash, is there something that can be hacked around on the LP side?
[08:52] <juliank> or in ubuntu-archive
[08:52] <juliank> So did source-only copy by accident, cancelled builds, now need builds copied
[08:53] <juliank> or the whole thing purged from proposed so I can build again
[08:54] <juliank> Because otherwise, we'll have to resubmit the shim again and get it reviewed and signed again, and that's super silly
[08:54] <juliank> Or not update impish I guess
[08:55] <juliank> and yes, I should have talked to archive first
[08:56] <juliank> Oh after cancelling the build I could copy-package -b it now
[08:56] <juliank> So I guess sorry for the noise, I just got super scared :D
[08:56] <juliank> phew
[08:57] <juliank> (it rejected it first time I tried as it was scheduling builds alreaday)
[08:57] <juliank> gotta be more frakking careful
[08:58] <laney> it's a good idea to get copy-package commands reviewed
[09:00] <juliank> laney: -b is easy to miss :D
[09:00] <juliank> laney: Maybe copies should go into unapproved queue by default unless an extra flag is passed
[09:01] <juliank> Then you can go look at it and see it did the right thing
[09:09] <juliank> waiting for the binaries to pop up on rmadison
[09:46] <laney> ginggs: sorry missed that - np
[09:46] <apw> cancelling the builds and recopying with binaries ought to work out ok, pretty sure i've done that with the odd kernel in the past
[09:47] <apw> juliank, we have copy-proposed-kernel for this reason; which knows about which packages must have -b and which not to not make a horrible unfixable mess.
[09:48] <juliank> ack
[10:06] <utkarsh> cjwatson: hey, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#php-defaults -> no more blockers now! \o/
[10:06] <cjwatson> utkarsh: Aside from the php7.4 stuff?  But indeed, progress
[10:07] <utkarsh> cjwatson: can you, with AA hat on, force migrate php-defaults & remove php7.4 from the archive?
[10:07] <utkarsh> php8.0 is already in the -release pocket.
[10:07] <cjwatson> utkarsh: This isn't something I've been involved with for years, so I'm reluctant to touch it
[10:07] <cjwatson> utkarsh: And migration is more an ~ubuntu-release thing
[10:08] <utkarsh> cjwatson: ah, no problem then! probably vorlon would know?
[10:08] <cjwatson> Yep
[10:08] <cjwatson> Or might well be somebody else in a more EUish timezone
[10:09] <utkarsh> in all, I'd like to know if there's anything that's left on my part to do? I've cleared up all the blockers + re-triggers and now only thing that's left is force-migrating & removing php7.4, I believe.
[10:09] <utkarsh> yep, thanks! I'll hang around here to see if there's anyone who can help :)
[10:09] <utkarsh> vorlon & I have polar opposite timezones :D
[10:10] <laney> utkarsh: can you file a hint to force-skiptest that, and a removal bug for php7.4?
[10:11] <laney> I guess once it migrates the rdepends list will become empty?
[10:12] <utkarsh> laney: perfect, I'll do that now. A removal bug already exists, though. As soon as it migrates, I'll let you know here, thank you!
[10:13] <laney> okey
[10:23] <ricotz> sil2100, here is the reminder ;P
[10:27] <utkarsh> laney: https://code.launchpad.net/~utkarsh/britney/+git/britney/+merge/404519 -> hints MP for your review.
[10:30] <juliank> Hmm
[10:30] <juliank> shim-signed FTBFS now because no sighed shim binaries for 15.4-0ubuntu5 in  http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/dists/impish-proposed/main/signed/shim-amd64/ yet
[10:31] <sil2100> ricotz: thanks! On it in a minute ;)
[10:32] <laney> utkarsh: I think we'll need a force too, for the uninstallability noted there
[10:33] <laney> should I remove that php7.4 rebuild in proposed?
[10:33] <utkarsh> laney: yes, please. It's unneeded anyway.
[10:36] <utkarsh> as for force, Steve hinted to use hints instead, here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-defaults/+bug/1927264/comments/2
[10:36] <utkarsh> let me know what you think I/we should do! :)
[10:37] <laney> yeah, I mean a force hint
[10:37] <laney> LP git is being interminably slow 'git pull'ing the hints, stand by
[10:38] <utkarsh> sure, no rush! \o/
[10:38] <mdeslaur> jamespage: ceph is pretty much built in the security team PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages
[10:38] <mdeslaur> jamespage: we're just waiting on riscv64
[10:39] <mdeslaur> jamespage: do you want to run those against your usual testing procedure and let me know when I can release them?
[10:39] <jamespage> mdeslaur: as we always do
[10:39] <jamespage> yep - can get to that
[10:39] <mdeslaur> jamespage: awesome, thanks!
[10:44] <laney> utkarsh: ok pushed, removing 7.4 now
[10:44] <laney> (from -proposed)
[10:45] <sil2100> ricotz: oh, this noopt workaround for armhf feels much better than the other propositions!
[10:45] <laney> done
[10:46] <sil2100> ricotz: one thing that I'd like to request is - could you add info about this workaround in the SRU bug description?
[10:46] <laney> noopt> not sure about that, in terms of making nicely usable binaries ...
[10:48] <sil2100> Depends on how many libreoffice users we have on armhf, I still consider this nicer than building with gcc-8, quite the old compiler
[10:51] <sil2100> ricotz: re: that ^, did anyone test the armhf libreoffice armhf binaries when built with noopt?
[10:51] <utkarsh> laney: awesome, thank you!
[10:52] <laney> utkarsh: I can't actually push, it seems :/
[10:52] <ricotz> sil2100, added a note to the sru bug, there was no testing besides running the testsuite which didn't show the crash anymore
[10:53] <utkarsh> laney: to my branch? can you send a diff, I'll push from here?
[10:53] <ricotz> laney, sil2100, regarding the real world usage, I would expect people to use the arm64 build in recent hardware
[10:53] <seb128> sil2100, from an user perspective it might be nicer having an optimized binary build with an older gcc than a slower build from a new compiler
[10:53] <seb128> just saying :)
[10:53] <laney> utkarsh: no, to merge your branch to the real hints one
[10:54] <utkarsh> aah!
[10:54] <laney> I don't think I could push to yours - LP doesn't have that feature AFAIK
[10:54] <utkarsh> yep
[10:54] <laney> ('maintainers can push')
[10:55] <laney> anyway I pinged in #launchpad, hopefully git can be woken up
[10:55] <utkarsh> great, thank you!
[10:59] <laney> bah
[11:08] <sil2100> seb128, ricotz: hm hm, yeah, so maybe to get a better understanding, before we proceed I'd like to know if there is a huge performance regression when built with noopt for armhf or not
[11:09] <sil2100> Since yeah, it felt 'cleaner' to me before, but indeed if the performance drop is noticable, I guess I'd prefer another approach
[11:09] <seb128> sil2100, did we ever decide on the 'build in bileto without the buggy gcc-9 SRU'?
[11:09] <sil2100> So I both agree with laney and seb128 here - if, of course, it's noticable to armhf users
[11:10] <seb128> sil2100, that would give us a working binary with optimization on the same compiler serie the release has
[11:10] <sil2100> seb128: yeah, I mentioned at one moment that we could give it a try
[11:10] <sil2100> (on #ubuntu-desktop some days ago)
[11:10] <seb128> wdym give it a try?
[11:10] <laney> are you considering not blocking the SRU on this?
[11:10] <seb128> either it's ok by the SRU team or not
[11:10] <laney> the gcc-9 SRU on this regression, I m ean
[11:11] <laney> because if it is blocked, we might as well delete it ...
[11:11] <sil2100> laney: gcc-9 will not go out of -proposed
[11:11] <seb128> that's the other option
[11:11] <seb128> if it's proved to be buggy maybe delete and just rebuild libreoffice without bileto then
[11:11] <seb128> I would +1 that one :)
[11:12] <sil2100> I thought we wanted to have it there for debugging purposes, also, it's not entirely clear (at least from what I heard) if this needs changes on the gcc side or libreoffice side
[11:12] <sil2100> This is why I was leaving it blocked there
[11:12] <sil2100> I do not actively track the gcc regression discussion so I just know what I heard here and there
[11:12] <seb128> so we picked a binary that started segfaulting after rebuild with that gcc on armhf
[11:13] <seb128> how do we get confidence there are no other sources that will be impacted the same way?
[11:14] <laney> utkarsh: finally pushed
[11:14] <laney> the next complete proposed-migration run should see the new hints
[11:14] <utkarsh> laney: awesome! what's left now? we wait for hints to do its magic?
[11:14] <laney> probably be a couple of hours at least
[11:14] <utkarsh> right & php-defaults should auto-migrate then?
[11:15] <laney> well, we'll see ;-) that's always the game
[11:15] <utkarsh> heh, of course
[11:15] <laney> but hopefully
[11:15] <utkarsh> awesome, thank you! I'll keep an eye on this
[11:15] <utkarsh> btw, is php7.4 removed from -proposed?
[11:15] <laney> yeah
[11:16] <sil2100> hm, actually, the gcc-9 uploads were bincopies from the toolchain PPA, so that could be used for testing
[11:16] <laney> you can see on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.4/+publishinghistory
[11:16] <utkarsh> right, thank you, again!
[11:17] <ricotz> sil2100, the gcc-9 build in impish shows the same issue, so hirsute is not strictly required to debug it
[11:17] <seb128> sil2100, launchpad also keep the debs anyway so it's always possible to download them and install
[11:17] <sil2100> Let me poke around on that in a minute, since my head is still a bit dizzy
[11:18] <ricotz> fun with libreoffice :(
[11:18]  * laney hugs ricotz :(
[11:18] <sil2100> Per SRU policy it indeed should be considered for removal
[11:19] <sil2100> Too bad it's been in -proposed for so long, since many other packages already used it to build
[11:20] <ricotz> sil2100, but gcc-10 is the default in hiruste?
[11:20] <seb128> it's only since the 8th and in hirsute
[11:20] <ricotz> so it should not have that much impact
[11:20] <laney> I guess one thing is that, if it's the same gcc-10 bug, it's been used to build most of hirsute and impish and the world didn't end
[11:22] <ricotz> laney, the impact of gcc-10 on libreoffice build is different though, but likely the same root cause
[11:22] <sil2100> Fun
[11:22] <laney> nod
[11:23] <ricotz> seeing "The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem." while building libreoffice with different gcc-9 revision is weird too
[11:23] <laney> anyway, I still would remove it if it were up to me, then it can be debugged but the heat is off a bit :-)
[11:23] <ricotz> (and it is reproducible on the armhf builders)
[11:23] <seb128> also I don't want to derail and start another discussion, but does a gcc-9.3 to gcc-9.4 does really qualify for a SRU? it's neither a micro release nor something on the exceptions list
[11:24] <seb128> I would also vote +1 for deleting it
[11:31] <utkarsh> laney: hey, I've marked LP: #1927264 as "fix committed"; let me know if that doesn't represent the current situation appropriately!
[11:35] <sil2100> laney: btw.! Just out of curiosity - if I delete a package from, say, -proposed and then after a while restore (undelete it), will britney still consider the previous test results for that package? Or will it re-trigger tests again? I guess it should just take those existing, as the version didn't change?
[11:39] <laney> sil2100: that's right. It'll go look in its cache or swift first, before requesting a new test run, so the old results should get found
[11:40] <sil2100> Okay, then I guess I'm leaning towards removing it as per your proposition
[11:41]  * ricotz prepares a libreoffice source without touching the gcc deps
[11:47] <juliank> sil2100: could you approve the shim signing tarballs in hirsute for me?
[11:47] <sil2100> juliank: sure
[11:47] <ricotz> sil2100, if we want to the route then please reject libreoffice from the queue, so I will upload a version without the noopt tweak
[11:48] <sil2100> juliank: hm, don't see any
[11:48] <juliank> sil2100: sorry, impish
[11:48] <juliank> typo day
[11:48] <sil2100> ricotz: please upload away, there can be multiple packages with the same version number in the queue
[11:48] <sil2100> I'll pick the right one then
[11:48] <sil2100> juliank: ah!
[11:48] <ricotz> sil2100, alright, will do
[11:49]  * juliank also looked at the wrong queue and was totally confused
[11:49] <juliank> :D
[11:49] <juliank> (earlier today)
[11:49] <laney> I think juliank might need some close reviewing today 🙃
[11:49] <juliank> laney: Oh yeah
[11:50] <juliank> Or caffeine, but it's afternoon now so that ship has sailed I think
[11:52] <sil2100> Well, tell me about it, I was confused multiple times today as well, but thankfully there's laney
[11:52] <laney> I'm just confused as a baseline
[11:53] <juliank> it's hard it's only 17°C outside
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:7.1.3-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 1:7.1.4-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:54] <juliank> 10°C dfrop over night
[11:54] <juliank> messes with you
[11:54] <juliank> inside temperature dropped about 5°C
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libreoffice [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:7.1.4-0ubuntu0.21.04.1]
[11:56] <RikMills> do we know when ISO builds will be fixed?
[11:57] <sil2100> Soon!
[11:57] <RikMills> :)
[11:57] <sil2100> initramfs-tools is publishing as we speak, my RT is ready to press ze button
[11:57] <RikMills> nice. thanks!
[12:10] <RikMills> sil2100: impish? I don't see a new initramfs-tools there
[12:10] <laney> focal
[12:11] <RikMills> k
[12:11] <RikMills> so no fix is queued for impish yet?
[12:12] <sil2100> It's not needed in impish, this is actually fixed in impish
[12:12] <sil2100> It's failing as the builder is on focal
[12:12] <laney> impish has the bits already. what's needed is a fix on the host which builds the isos
[12:12] <RikMills> laney: aha. that makes sense. cheers :)
[12:13] <laney> assuming we don't find another thing after fixing this one hyuk hyuk hyuk
[12:13] <sil2100> Don't jinx it!
[12:14]  * RikMills crosses everything
[12:41] <laney> cjwatson: could you update the locked mode in here to not have 't' so that the topic can be changed please? or give me permission to do so
[12:54] <cjwatson> laney: You should be able to op yourself and change it
[12:55] <cjwatson> laney: Or you have permission to use the chanserv topic command
[13:28] <jibel> SRU team / bdmurray : Hi could someone review/approve ubiquity 20.04.15.13 and sssd 2.2.3-3ubuntu0.6 in focal unapproved queue?
[13:30] <sil2100> I can take a look in a minute
[13:33] <apw> laney, chanserve topic seems to be the approved way
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bluez (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.56-0ubuntu4.1 => 5.56-0ubuntu4.2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (hirsute-proposed/main) [15.4-0ubuntu2 => 15.4-0ubuntu5] (core) (sync)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.47 => 1.48] (core) (sync)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.33.1~16.04.7 => 1.47] (core) (sync)
[13:40] <juliank> ubuntu-sru please reject shim-signed/xenial sync
[13:40] <juliank> (^ sil2100
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (xenial-proposed/main) [15.4-0ubuntu2 => 15.4-0ubuntu5] (core) (sync)
[13:49] <apw> juliank, v
[13:49] <sil2100> !
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [sync] (xenial-proposed) [1.47]
[13:49] <sil2100> apw is faster than me!
[13:49] <juliank> oh thanks apw
[13:49] <juliank> sil2100: everything is a race these days
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bluez (focal-proposed/main) [5.53-0ubuntu3.2 => 5.53-0ubuntu3.3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bluez (hirsute-proposed/main) [5.56-0ubuntu4.1 => 5.56-0ubuntu4.2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected bluez [source] (hirsute-proposed) [5.56-0ubuntu4.2]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:7.1.4-0ubuntu0.21.04.1]
[14:26] <laney> cjwatson: ok, should I read that as you being opposed to removing it?
[14:27] <laney> the mode is locked, so I can't remove it if that's what you meant
[14:27] <laney> it seemed fine to me having been open over the years
[14:35] <sil2100> jibel: hey! Re: the ubiquity SRUs - they're set to Fix Released for devel, so I assume these are fixed in the current version in impish, right? Also, this is not important that much but out of curiosity, are those fixed in hirsute?
[14:36] <sil2100> (since we don't intend to respin hirsute images)
[14:36] <sil2100> (but still interested)
[14:38] <cjwatson> laney: Sort of -0.1.  IME -t is OK a lot of the time and then spammers randomly turn up and make life miserable sometimes
[14:38] <LocutusOfBorg> so can we sync php8.0 from sid next britney run?
[14:39] <cjwatson> laney: I'd slightly prefer keeping topic changes just for ops (i.e. you can do it because chanserv thinks you have operator privileges here, you just need to op yourself)
[14:41] <cjwatson> But I'll remove +t if I seem to be outvoted :)
[14:45] <apw> given one can just ask chanserv, it seems strange to open it up to abuse (to me)
[14:45] <jibel> sil2100, yeah it's fixed in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/21.10.2 but we won't fix hirsute
[14:45] <jibel> since as you said there won't be new images
[14:47] <jibel> and *if* there is one, then we can SRU the fixes there too.
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.13]
[14:57] <jibel> sil2100, and for sssd the code we backported to focal is already in hirsute
[14:58] <sil2100> jibel: thanks! One thing regarding that: since sssd I think is basically maintained by the server team, did you talk to them about what they think of adding this patch?
[14:59] <sil2100> Asking since it's quite a big patch so basically the server team will ahve to keep mainteining it
[15:00] <sil2100> Anyway, accepting that, left my concerns on the bug but otherwise accepting
[15:00] <jibel> sil2100, thanks, I'll request a review from them too.
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (focal-proposed) [2.2.3-3ubuntu0.6]
[15:03] <laney> apw: just makes life easier, lets people contribute, has been basically fine for years
[15:03] <laney> but doesn't matter, not a big deal
[15:05] <utkarsh2102> laney: I hope things are set to migrate, at least "Will attempt migration due to a hint (Any information below is purely informational)" has made me very hopeful :)
[15:05] <utkarsh2102> cf: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#php-defaults
[15:06] <laney> utkarsh2102: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt nope
[15:06] <laney> maybe I need a stronger hint
[15:07] <laney> I think I need force-hint too
[15:08] <utkarsh2102> bah!
[15:08] <utkarsh2102> of course update_excuses :)
[15:08] <laney> ok added that
[15:08] <utkarsh2102> perfect, thank you!
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-data-server (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.40.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.40.0-1ubuntu1.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:42] <vorlon> laney: yep, force-hint is the trick :)
[15:43]  * laney nods
[15:43] <laney> there's also 'allow-uninst' I see, wonder if that would have worked
[15:43] <vorlon> huh
[16:13] <vorlon> coreycb: hey, python-pbr shows up on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html with a goodly number of reverse-build-dependencies that need updating.  Is the openstack team aware of this?
[16:16] <vorlon> ogra: what is the xlnx-firmware package in hirsute-proposed NEW queue?  If it's needed, it'll need some kind of reupload because I can't even download it from the queue for review
[16:17] <ogra> vorlon, sil2100 should be able to he was involved with the customer stuff ...
[16:18] <ogra> i was only the upload minion
[16:18] <vorlon> hmm :)
[16:18] <ogra> well ... pocket copy minion 🙂
[16:18] <vorlon> where was it copied from? because it's listed as "from private ppa" and it's not downloadable at all from the queue
[16:18] <ogra> yeah, it came from a private PPA
[16:19] <vorlon> well, it's unreviewable
[16:19] <vorlon> so I'm going to reject it
[16:19] <ogra> and people that should be able to review have been added to the PPA team
[16:19] <vorlon> have I?
[16:19] <ogra> heh, well, it was supposed that ubuntu-release as a whole should be added
[16:20] <coreycb> vorlon: thanks, we'll take care of that - I think we can just remove the python-pbr (build-)depends from those packages. icey can you take this?
[16:20] <vorlon> ... which is the wrong team for a NEW review in a stable release, but I'm in it, so it doesn't seem to have worked :)
[16:22] <vorlon> ogra: so do you want to have a second look at the ppa setup?
[16:23] <bdmurray> laney: how often is autopkgtest-package-configs updated on the server?
[16:24] <ogra> vorlon,oops, sorry, my bad, it was ubuntu-archive that was added, not -release (i have zero to do with that stuff, and was only asked by john agosta if i could copy it over as core-dev)
[16:24] <laney> bdmurray: https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/charms/focal/autopkgtest-cloud-worker/units/pull-package-configs.timer
[16:24] <vorlon> ogra: well, I'm in that team too but it still doesn't let me download! :)
[16:24] <ogra> weird
[16:25] <ogra> vorlon, i know xnox and sil2100 were able to download ... (at least they said so here) ... lets perhaps take it to mattermost
[16:27] <bdmurray> laney: thanks!
[16:29] <laney> the xlnx thing is another instance of bug #1923177 btw ;-)
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected xlnx-firmware [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [0.1ubuntu14]
[16:45] <ogra> vorlon, better now ?
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xlnx-firmware (hirsute-proposed/primary) [0.1ubuntu15]
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-data-server [source] (hirsute-proposed) [3.40.0-1ubuntu1.1]
[17:31] <laney> utkarsh2102: looks like it went in, let's do the removal tomorrow
[17:32] <laney> unless vorlon wants to get there first
[17:33] <utkarsh2102> laney: woot, woot! I am happy that it worked! thanks a bunch! \o/
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (groovy-proposed) [15.2.12-0ubuntu0.20.10.1]
[17:59] <utkarsh2102> laney: hey, I still see php-defaults in the excuses page, though. And rmadison still mentions -proposed :(
[18:01] <RikMills> https://kde.org/announcements/plasma/5/5.22.2/
[18:10] <laney> utkarsh2102: give it time, check the publishing history - it's moved
[18:11] <utkarsh2102> laney: aha, gotcha, thank you!
[18:11] <RikMills> whoops. that link was not meant for here. sorry
[18:13] <LocutusOfBorg> and php8.0 is syncd :D
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lighttpd [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4.55-1ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lighttpd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.45-1ubuntu3.18.04.1]
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted simplestreams [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1.0-30-g3cc8988a-0ubuntu1.20.04.1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mysql-5.7 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.7.34-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 5.7.34-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (core)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mysql-5.7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.7.33-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-desktop3 [amd64] (impish-proposed/main) [40.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-desktop3 [s390x] (impish-proposed/main) [40.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-desktop3 [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/main) [40.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-desktop3 [arm64] (impish-proposed/main) [40.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-desktop3 [armhf] (impish-proposed/main) [40.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.197.1 => 1.197.2] (core, kernel)
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.33.1~16.04.7 => 1.33.1~16.04.8] (core)
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strongswan [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.6.2-1ubuntu2.6]
[19:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-desktop3 [riscv64] (impish-proposed/main) [40.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mysql-5.7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.7.34-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.197.2]
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [15.4-0ubuntu5]
[21:25] <utkarsh2102> vorlon: thanks a bunch! :D
[21:25] <vorlon> utkarsh2102: my pleasure
[21:25] <utkarsh2102> with this, php8.0 transition is formally over, yay! \o/
[21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [1.48]
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.47]
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim [sync] (groovy-proposed) [15.4-0ubuntu2]
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim [sync] (xenial-proposed) [15.4-0ubuntu5]
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.33.1~16.04.8]
[23:18] <Trevinho> anyone can ack those NEW's for gnome-desktop3 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/impish/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=gnome-desktop3 ?