[06:19] <icey> coreycb: vorlon: I'm going to work those python-pbr removals today
[06:27] <didrocks> RAOF: hey, can you resume phasing of gnome-shell on focal? The new reported crash has nothing to do with the area we patched (and the error rate was already low, so I guess it’s just a bump in the matrix :p)
[06:50] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, can anybody please review vbox* from SRU queue?
[06:51] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe tjaalton pleeeeeeeease? :D
[06:53] <enyc> =)
[06:55] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox-ext-pack/+bug/1926937
[08:16] <RAOF> didrocks: Has someone else got to that? It doesn't look to me like it's halted phasing.
[08:16] <didrocks> RAOF: ah, I received an email telling me so, but I don’t know how to check and if somebody else unblocked (but I didn’t get any other answer than you)
[08:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.13 => 20.04.15.14] (core)
[09:49] <RAOF> I'm just looking at https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html , which doesn't list any errors for gnome-shell/focal.
[10:26] <xnox> didrocks:  after initial release, the rate of crashes can be inflated if there is 1 crash 1 min after being phased, which dies down as time progresses. Once it does, and the crash rate drops below normal, phasing auto restarts by itself.
[10:26] <xnox> is roughly the explanation i got about this before. because math is actually hard for this stuff, given that we have unknown number of installs.
[10:27] <xnox> so if on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html rate increase is empty, live is good, and phasing is comencing.
[10:45] <juliank> I'd appreciate someone to approve shim signed tarballs on xenial
[10:45] <juliank> :)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ii-esu (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0a.dfsg1-8build3 => 1.0a.dfsg1-8build4] (no packageset)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tatan (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.dfsg1-8build3 => 1.0.dfsg1-8build4] (no packageset)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: projectl (focal-proposed/universe) [1.001.dfsg1-9build3 => 1.001.dfsg1-9build4] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: a7xpg (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.dfsg1-10build3 => 0.11.dfsg1-10build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dustmite (focal-proposed/universe) [0~20170126.e95dff8-3build3 => 0~20170126.e95dff8-3build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ii-esu (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0a.dfsg1-8build3 => 1.0a.dfsg1-8build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parsec47 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.dfsg1-9build3 => 0.2.dfsg1-9build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tatan (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.dfsg1-8build3 => 1.0.dfsg1-8build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: torus-trooper (focal-proposed/universe) [0.22.dfsg1-12build3 => 0.22.dfsg1-12build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: val-and-rick (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1a.dfsg1-6build3 => 0.1a.dfsg1-6build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dub (focal-proposed/universe) [1.19.0-1build2 => 1.19.0-1build2.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mu-cade (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.dfsg1-12build4 => 0.11.dfsg1-12build4.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: titanion (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.dfsg1-7build3 => 0.3.dfsg1-7build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gunroar (focal-proposed/universe) [0.15.dfsg1-9build3 => 0.15.dfsg1-9build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tumiki-fighters (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.dfsg1-9build3 => 0.2.dfsg1-9build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: projectl (focal-proposed/universe) [1.001.dfsg1-9build3 => 1.001.dfsg1-9build3.1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ii-esu [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0a.dfsg1-8build4]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tatan [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.dfsg1-8build4]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected projectl [source] (focal-proposed) [1.001.dfsg1-9build4]
[11:23] <paride> laney, hi!
[11:24] <paride> laney, it seems that we're having issues with the image building process, see for example https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/impish/daily-live-20210622.log
[11:25] <paride> which *may* be a hiccup, but the previous builds also failed, see for example https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/impish/daily-live-20210621.log
[11:25] <paride> which has error lines like: ERROR WHILE BUILDING OFFICIAL IMAGES !!
[11:26] <paride> and indeed the 'pending' images on cdimage.ubuntu.com are outdated
[11:29] <paride> it seems that the latest round of correctly generated Impish ISO images are: Ubuntu-Server 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Alpha amd64 (20210614.1)
[11:29] <didrocks999> xnox: oh, interesting, I didn’t know there was that euristic, how can we know that phasing has restarted?
[11:29] <didrocks999> xnox: just checking phased-updates with empty rate?
[11:30] <paride> laney, is this something you can look into?
[11:30] <laney> paride: the latest one looks like a blip - there were some git.lp.n outages yesterday
[11:30] <laney> previous to that the images were broken because of a switch to zstd compression for the initramfs
[11:30] <laney> but sil2100 got IS to upgrade the necessary stuff for that
[11:30] <laney> let's see what happens with today's?
[11:31] <paride> laney, sure! thanks.
[11:38] <apw> laney, any idea who added libreoffice to the impish:i386-whitelist ?
[11:38] <laney> apw: nope not a clue. isn't that just managed by the script / germinate?
[11:39] <apw> laney, ahh i guess it could have gone again from germinate output of course.
[11:40] <laney> it seems odd that it would be dragged in there
[11:40] <laney> but kinda hard to see in retrospect
[11:40] <laney> does the script want to remove it now?
[11:42] <apw> yeah it would indeed
[11:43] <laney> sounds like a net win for society
[11:44] <apw> laney, https://code.launchpad.net/~apw/ubuntu-archive-tools/i386-whitelist--intuit-nvidia-versions/+merge/404567
[11:44] <apw> laney, seems i forgot to propose this for merge ...
[11:45] <laney> ah yes
[11:46] <laney> apw: that looks good!
[12:11] <doko> apw, laney: I did, to validate with ricotz that it builds on 32bit archs beside armhf
[12:13] <laney> doko: it would be helpful to do that by updating update-i386-whitelist, so others can find out what's going on
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 to i386-whitelist in impish
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libreoffice from i386-whitelist in impish
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed php7.4 from i386-whitelist in impish
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed xmlrpc-epi from i386-whitelist in impish
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 to i386-whitelist in impish
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server to i386-whitelist in impish
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 to i386-whitelist in impish
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-460 to i386-whitelist in impish
[12:49] <paride> laney, so now we have impish-live-server images, but they're all bad :( there's some kind of restart loop after the ISO image kernel loads
[12:49] <paride> My impression is that some piece of subiquity is missing
[12:50] <laney> bah
[12:50] <paride> :)
[12:50] <laney> I'll hand you over to xnox for that one though
[12:50] <laney> (assuming it's zstd fun times)
[12:50] <paride> that's because I mentioned 'kernel'? :)
[12:51] <paride> at least this is easy to reproduce: (1) grab the latest impish-live-server-amd64 image (2) try to install a VM
[13:08] <paride> the livefs build log seems sane
[13:44] <laney> paride: can you file a bug? anything on the console?
[13:45] <paride> laney, the console is in a loop showing the issue text (/etc/issue), with no login prompt
[13:53] <paride> laney, I'll file a bug against ubuntu-cdimage
[14:02] <mdeslaur> jamespage: I'm off for the next week and a half, please let sbeattie or leosilva know when the ceph packages are ready to be published. thanks!
[14:19] <xnox> didrocks:  that .html report is the source of info. The emails are one time thing when it goes from phasing to not-phasing (edge detection). I don't think there is email when it goes back from not-phasing to phasing.
[14:20] <xnox> paride:  i saw mwhudson was fixing starting subiquity on serial consoles......
[14:20] <xnox> laney:  i daubt it is zstd related.
[14:24] <xnox> laney:  i had bugs locally, cause my base snap was not refreshed as well. for good measure do `snap refresh core20` as well, in case that one has any fixes.
[14:24] <xnox> -EWRONGCHAN sigh
[14:31] <paride> laney, xnox, mwhudson https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1933352
[14:48] <bdmurray> juliank: I'll approve the shim signed tarballs for xenial
[14:48] <juliank> bdmurray: hooray; thanks
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-base (hirsute-proposed/main) [4.5ubuntu5.2 => 4.5ubuntu5.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-base (focal-proposed/main) [4.5ubuntu3.5 => 4.5ubuntu3.6] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.33.1~16.04.8 => 1.33.1~16.04.9] (core)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reprepro (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1.2 => 5.3.0-1.3~ubuntu21.04] (no packageset)
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reprepro (groovy-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1.1 => 5.3.0-1.3~ubuntu20.10] (no packageset)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reprepro (focal-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1.1 => 5.3.0-1.3~ubuntu20.04] (no packageset)
[21:11] <mwhudson> can't exec python3
[21:11] <mwhudson> ?
[21:11] <mwhudson> you wot
[21:11] <vorlon> ?
[21:12] <mwhudson> oh the live installer breakage
[21:12] <mwhudson> *server
[21:14] <mwhudson> uhh
[21:14] <mwhudson> so /snap/core18/2074 is empty
[21:15] <mwhudson> yeah core18 is in the seed.yaml but not in the seeds directory
[21:16] <mwhudson> i guess core18 is no longer in the filesystem layer because lxd is core20 now
[21:16] <mwhudson> and the seeding into the installer layer somehow isn't working
[21:16]  * mwhudson launches everything into the sun
[21:17] <mwhudson> yeah if i manually install core18 it starts successfully
[21:29] <laney> mwhudson: you're talking about paride's bug?
[21:39] <mwhudson> laney: yes
[21:40] <mwhudson> laney: should be an easy fix
[21:42] <laney> oh god you said it
[21:46] <vorlon> :)
[22:00] <mwhudson> laney: i'll try to avoid the fix including rewriting livecd-rootfs in rust
[22:38] <mwhudson> here's my proposed fix https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/404620
[22:38] <mwhudson> building here https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+livefs/ubuntu/impish/test/+build/283169
[22:45] <bdmurray> Could an AA reject language-pack-gnome-en from impish-proposed?
[22:45] <bdmurray> It has an lower version number than what's in the release pocket.
[22:47] <bdmurray> vorlon: ^
[22:48] <vorlon> bdmurray: done
[23:44] <mwhudson> ok my livecd-rootfs fix appears to work
[23:52] <mwhudson> merging & uploading