[08:36] <lag> Anyone know of a recent change that results in my laptop idling at 400MHz with nothing working well?
[09:12] <nibbon_> lag: is an intel laptop?
[09:14] <lag> nibbon_: It's a Dell laptop with 8-core: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1505M v5 @ 2.80GHz
[09:15] <nibbon_> did you install the latest intel microcode?
[09:41] <apw> lag, nothing i have heard sounding like that.
[10:05] <lag> nibbon_: I haven't, but it's worth a shot I guess
[10:05] <lag> Idling like that must be saving a lot of power so powersave is doing the right thing I guess - but it's not practical for most applications 
[10:05] <lag> apw: Okay, thanks
[10:06] <nibbon_> lag: out of curiosity what kernel version do you have?
[10:06] <apw> i'd ping cking, but he isn't here.
[10:07] <lag> apw: I'll ping him on Facebook - he's always there :D
[10:07] <lag> nibbon_: Ubuntu 5.11.0-18-generic 
[10:08] <lag> I hear  db865272d9c4 ("cpufreq: Avoid configuring old governors as default with intel_pstate") might be the cause 
[10:17] <apw> lag, can you file a bug for me, with that info in it ...
[10:18] <apw> lag, so we can track what h/w it is as well.
[10:18] <cking> @lag, the /proc/cpu info and H/W model would be most useful
[10:23] <apw> lag, also ... try -22
[10:25] <lag> apw: -EINVAL?
[10:25] <apw> lag, heh yeah, that ... no 5.11.0-22
[10:25] <apw> or indeed -23 is now in -proposed.
[10:26] <apw> and i know there was a heap of stable no all of the onces since -18
[10:26] <lag> apw: Oh, ha!
[10:26] <lag> apw: I'll update in a sec
[10:27] <lag> Fingers crossed
[23:12] <kees> Hi! Say, why does the Ubuntu kernel not use the ORC unwinder? I just noticed CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled...
[23:14] <sarnold> 5-10% performance improvement? and all it costs is 4mb ram?
[23:17] <sarnold> my Wild Guess is that the frame pointers are enabled so bpfcc etc tooling can give traces