[05:19] <callmepk> good afternoon
[05:19] <duflu> Hi callmepk 
[05:19] <callmepk> hi duflu 
[06:25] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:37] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN 
[06:41] <seb128> goood morning desktopers
[06:46] <didrocks> good morning
[06:50] <duflu> Hi seb128 and didrocks 
[06:52] <seb128> hey didrocks duflu oSoMoN , how are you?
[06:52] <didrocks> hey duflu, seb128 
[06:52] <didrocks> seb128: ça va, et toi ?
[06:53] <duflu> seb128, going well. You?
[06:53] <seb128> I'm alright thanks!
[07:25] <duflu> seb128, do you think we should move the remaining items from https://trello.com/b/pgN9wLfa/wayland-by-default into the common board?
[07:25] <duflu> Then we can close the wayland-by-default board
[07:35] <seb128> duflu, yes, let me check what is still needed, thanks for pointing it out
[07:36] <duflu> I particularly don't want to forget the Firefox touchpad scrolling bug. It's one of the reasons I don't use Ubuntu for couch surfing at the moment. Actually I want to look into a couple of touchpad bugs for that reason
[07:45] <seb128> duflu, unsure why trello doesn't want to let move cards between boards, annoying
[07:46] <duflu> Yeah it wouldn't let me copy either
[07:47] <duflu> seb128, looks like laney is an admin there
[07:52] <oSoMoN> hey duflu, salut seb128 & didrocks 
[07:54] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN 
[07:57] <oSoMoN> ricotz, well done bisecting the offending gcc 9 commit!
[08:04] <laney> moin
[08:04] <laney> I did ze card moving
[08:05] <seb128> laney, hey, how are you? thanks for the moving!
[08:06] <duflu> Hi laney
[08:06] <laney> hi seb128 duflu 
[08:07] <laney> I'm alright yeah 👍
[08:07] <laney> dunno why you couldn't move the cards when not an admin
[08:07] <seb128> ricotz, you recently built libreoffice on armhf with -O0 so I guess it means bug #1894233 is fixed?
[08:08] <laney> I'm not one on the common board and I have the option to move cards there
[08:08] <laney> or AM i??!?!?!
[08:09] <seb128> ricotz, and bug #1894222
[08:10] <laney> no, I'm not, so I would have expected that to work for any member
[08:11] <seb128> laney, I can move cards from the common board so if I had to guess I would say need to be admin from the board you are about to remove the card from
[08:11] <ricotz> good morning desktopers
[08:11] <ricotz> oSoMoN, thanks :)
[08:12] <ricotz> seb128, yes, building with noopt aka -O0 on armhf works around the problem, I remember you came up with performance concerns ;P
[08:12] <laney> seb128: I mean I can move cards from the common board too
[08:12] <seb128> ricotz, right, well my point was rather than if it built then it means that report could be closed?
[08:12] <laney> or at least I have the button to do that
[08:12] <seb128> laney, it let you pick other boards?
[08:12] <ricotz> this is actually what Debian is doing with libreoffice on armhf
[08:12] <laney> didn't actually confirm any moves
[08:12] <laney> yes
[08:12] <seb128> ah, weird
[08:13] <seb128> the snaps board doesn't let me for example
[08:13] <ricotz> seb128, that is about 7.0
[08:13] <seb128> I can only pick other columns
[08:13] <ricotz> but 7.1 worked
[08:13] <duflu> Morning ricotz 
[08:13] <laney> looks good for me there too
[08:13] <seb128> ricotz, k, well our libreoffice isn't versioned, so if it's fixed in the current version it can be closed :)
[08:14] <ricotz> seb128, go for it :)
[08:14] <seb128> thanks
[08:15] <seb128> ricotz, did you try a -O1 on armhf with the recent version by any chance? maybe that one is also to close?
[08:16] <ricotz> seb128, no, I didn't
[08:16] <ricotz> hey duflu 
[08:21] <ricotz> seb128, hopefully do_ko can work with that bisect result
[08:21] <seb128> ricotz, did you see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1931701/comments/7 ?
[08:22] <ricotz> seb128, yes, still it is progress to know the cause in gcc
[08:23] <seb128> yes, it just seems do_ko isn't interested to pick it up from this point though
[08:23] <seb128> but maybe we can upstream a gcc bug pointing out that the commit regressed libreoffice on armhf
[08:23] <seb128> they might be helpful with the issue
[08:24] <ricotz> using -O0 with 7.2 seems the easiest option to use the default gcc again (aka gcc-10 which showed different/more regressions on armhf)
[08:25] <seb128> so the gcc-10 situation isn't resolved by reverting that same commit?
[08:26] <ricotz> reverting this gcc change would at least open the possibility for gcc-9 SRU again
[08:26] <ricotz> no, this change was altered for gcc-9 and is different in gcc-10
[08:26] <laney> offer for an arm vm is still there :-)
[08:26] <laney> then you could try to reduce the testcase down as requested
[08:27] <ricotz> but this change is part of gcc-10 since 10.3.0, the libreoffice failed with earlier gcc-10 version already
[08:27] <seb128> I would still start by upstreaming a bug with the bisect result
[08:29]  * laney shrugs then
[08:31] <ricotz> laney, I will let you know
[08:33] <laney> alrighty
[09:08] <ricotz> oSoMoN, hey, do you know if there is progress regarding rustc/cargo updates
[09:08] <oSoMoN> ricotz, no progress on bug #1932145, so I guess not
[09:09] <oSoMoN> I'll ping Michael
[09:10] <ricotz> oSoMoN, I did some ugly copies from debian to get the trunk builds going on some archs
[09:10] <ricotz> oSoMoN, thanks!
[09:10] <oSoMoN> done, but he's offline atm, I'll let you know what he says
[09:11] <ricotz> ty
[10:33] <ricotz> kernel 5.13.0-11.11 runs smooth so far :)
[14:25] <hellsworth> good morning desktopers
[14:28] <didrocks999> good morning hellsworth 
[14:29] <jibel> Hi hellsworth 
[14:30] <hellsworth> hi guys :)
[14:32] <oSoMoN> hoy hellsworth 
[14:37] <hellsworth> hi oSoMoN :)
[16:21] <ricotz> hey hellsworth 
[16:21] <hellsworth> hi there ricotz