=== pizza is now known as pizzaiolo === Guest6204 is now known as blue_penquin[m] === pizzaiolo is now known as pizza [05:19] good afternoon [05:19] Hi callmepk [05:19] hi duflu [06:25] good morning desktoppers [06:37] Hi oSoMoN [06:41] goood morning desktopers [06:46] good morning [06:50] Hi seb128 and didrocks [06:52] hey didrocks duflu oSoMoN , how are you? [06:52] hey duflu, seb128 [06:52] seb128: ça va, et toi ? [06:53] seb128, going well. You? [06:53] I'm alright thanks! [07:25] seb128, do you think we should move the remaining items from https://trello.com/b/pgN9wLfa/wayland-by-default into the common board? [07:25] Then we can close the wayland-by-default board [07:35] duflu, yes, let me check what is still needed, thanks for pointing it out [07:36] I particularly don't want to forget the Firefox touchpad scrolling bug. It's one of the reasons I don't use Ubuntu for couch surfing at the moment. Actually I want to look into a couple of touchpad bugs for that reason [07:45] duflu, unsure why trello doesn't want to let move cards between boards, annoying [07:46] Yeah it wouldn't let me copy either [07:47] seb128, looks like laney is an admin there [07:52] hey duflu, salut seb128 & didrocks [07:54] salut oSoMoN [07:57] ricotz, well done bisecting the offending gcc 9 commit! [08:04] moin [08:04] I did ze card moving [08:05] laney, hey, how are you? thanks for the moving! [08:06] Hi laney [08:06] hi seb128 duflu [08:07] I'm alright yeah 👍 [08:07] dunno why you couldn't move the cards when not an admin [08:07] ricotz, you recently built libreoffice on armhf with -O0 so I guess it means bug #1894233 is fixed? [08:07] Bug 1894233 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "LO ftbfs with -O0" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894233 [08:08] I'm not one on the common board and I have the option to move cards there [08:08] or AM i??!?!?! [08:09] ricotz, and bug #1894222 [08:09] Bug 1894222 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "undefined reference when building with -O1 on armhf" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894222 [08:10] no, I'm not, so I would have expected that to work for any member [08:11] laney, I can move cards from the common board so if I had to guess I would say need to be admin from the board you are about to remove the card from [08:11] good morning desktopers [08:11] oSoMoN, thanks :) [08:12] seb128, yes, building with noopt aka -O0 on armhf works around the problem, I remember you came up with performance concerns ;P [08:12] seb128: I mean I can move cards from the common board too [08:12] ricotz, right, well my point was rather than if it built then it means that report could be closed? [08:12] or at least I have the button to do that [08:12] laney, it let you pick other boards? [08:12] this is actually what Debian is doing with libreoffice on armhf [08:12] didn't actually confirm any moves [08:12] yes [08:12] ah, weird [08:13] the snaps board doesn't let me for example [08:13] seb128, that is about 7.0 [08:13] I can only pick other columns [08:13] but 7.1 worked [08:13] Morning ricotz [08:13] looks good for me there too [08:13] ricotz, k, well our libreoffice isn't versioned, so if it's fixed in the current version it can be closed :) [08:14] seb128, go for it :) [08:14] thanks [08:15] ricotz, did you try a -O1 on armhf with the recent version by any chance? maybe that one is also to close? [08:16] seb128, no, I didn't [08:16] hey duflu [08:21] seb128, hopefully do_ko can work with that bisect result [08:21] ricotz, did you see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1931701/comments/7 ? [08:22] Launchpad bug 1931701 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Impish) "autopkgtests failures on armhf of 7.1.4" [High, New] [08:22] seb128, yes, still it is progress to know the cause in gcc [08:23] yes, it just seems do_ko isn't interested to pick it up from this point though [08:23] but maybe we can upstream a gcc bug pointing out that the commit regressed libreoffice on armhf [08:23] they might be helpful with the issue [08:24] using -O0 with 7.2 seems the easiest option to use the default gcc again (aka gcc-10 which showed different/more regressions on armhf) [08:25] so the gcc-10 situation isn't resolved by reverting that same commit? [08:26] reverting this gcc change would at least open the possibility for gcc-9 SRU again [08:26] no, this change was altered for gcc-9 and is different in gcc-10 [08:26] offer for an arm vm is still there :-) [08:26] then you could try to reduce the testcase down as requested [08:27] but this change is part of gcc-10 since 10.3.0, the libreoffice failed with earlier gcc-10 version already [08:27] I would still start by upstreaming a bug with the bisect result [08:29] * laney shrugs then [08:31] laney, I will let you know [08:33] alrighty [09:08] oSoMoN, hey, do you know if there is progress regarding rustc/cargo updates [09:08] ricotz, no progress on bug #1932145, so I guess not [09:08] Bug 1932145 in rustc (Ubuntu Hirsute) "rustc 1.51 and cargo 0.52 required by firefox 91" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1932145 [09:09] I'll ping Michael [09:10] oSoMoN, I did some ugly copies from debian to get the trunk builds going on some archs [09:10] oSoMoN, thanks! [09:10] done, but he's offline atm, I'll let you know what he says [09:11] ty [10:33] kernel 5.13.0-11.11 runs smooth so far :) [14:25] good morning desktopers [14:28] good morning hellsworth [14:29] Hi hellsworth [14:30] hi guys :) [14:32] hoy hellsworth [14:37] hi oSoMoN :) [16:21] hey hellsworth [16:21] hi there ricotz === Maik is now known as Mekaneck === alan_g_ is now known as alan_g