| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.38.5-1ubuntu2~21.04.1 => 3.38.5-1ubuntu2~21.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 01:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus-avro (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2-2 => 1.2-2ubuntu21.04.1] (no packageset) | 07:20 | |
| sil2100 | juliank: hey! The shim set that's in hirsute-proposed, that's all good to go, right? | 07:58 |
|---|---|---|
| juliank | sil2100: yeah, xenial one too | 07:58 |
| sil2100 | juliank: okay, what about the fwupd situation? Is that only re: focal's fwupd? Xenial is fine (since it's also still using fwupdate)? | 08:01 |
| juliank | sil2100: I wasn't aware we had a signed *fwupdate* on xenial | 08:02 |
| juliank | sil2100: this would break, surely | 08:03 |
| juliank | sil2100: people told me xenial would be fine because there's no signed fwupd in xenial, I guess nobody checked for a fwupdate | 08:04 |
| juliank | sil2100: so I guess we have to block-proposed-xenial and discuss :/ | 08:05 |
| juliank | sil2100: hirsute is definitely good to go, though | 08:05 |
| sil2100 | juliank: re: xenial, I guess someone with more experience with how it was done in xenial would have to take a look, since I don't really remember what the situation was there - but I think we still had fwupdate there going on | 08:20 |
| sil2100 | I'll proceed with hirsute for now and wait a bit with xenial just-in-case | 08:20 |
| cpaelzer | Hi ubuntu-archive people, anyone around to unblock open-iscsi that is in impish-new queue? | 08:25 |
| cpaelzer | that was a late addition to Debian (we had this for quite a while) under a slightly different name - hence it now is in NEW | 08:26 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 08:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu1] | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu1] | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu1] | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [amd64] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1] | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [armhf] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1] | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1] | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [arm64] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1] | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [s390x] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1] | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1] | 08:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:21.04.13 => 1:21.04.14] (core) | 08:58 | |
| tjaalton | the focal daily image is from Friday, should it have been built over the weekend or is there some issue holding it back? | 09:11 |
| laney | tjaalton: llvm-12 needs promoting | 09:12 |
| laney | it's YOU! | 09:12 |
| tjaalton | ha! :D | 09:13 |
| laney | in general you can find the logs under https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu/focal/ | 09:13 |
| tjaalton | but, I'd have thought it was already? | 09:13 |
| laney | which then link you to the actual log on LP | 09:13 |
| tjaalton | doko: ^ kernel-packages team has subscribed to the bugs | 09:13 |
| laney | check rmadison, it's just that it needs to be done in focal too | 09:14 |
| laney | I can do that | 09:16 |
| tjaalton | ok that'd be great | 09:17 |
| laney | or if doko has the command handy that would be easier, so I don't have to work out exactly which packages to prmote | 09:17 |
| laney | alright nm, I did it, it should be good in an hour or so | 09:32 |
| tjaalton | sweet, thanks | 09:32 |
| laney | be good if pg13 could move over so we can drop 11 out of main | 09:34 |
| tjaalton | annoying how common it is for sru-review to miss spamming/tagging the bugs | 09:45 |
| sil2100 | xnox: hello! Will you have some time to verify LP: #1933093 ? Sadly, from what I see the current pi-gadget build process doesn't respect the snappy image PPA when pulling in flash-kernel | 10:35 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1933093 in flash-kernel (Ubuntu Focal) "Drop old UC20 boot args" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1933093 | 10:35 |
| sil2100 | ...maybe that's actually something we'd want to fix, let me take a look | 10:39 |
| xnox | sil2100: i think it doesn't respect building from -proposed at all. last time i had to hack it locally _a lot_ to make it use something from -proposed. | 10:50 |
| xnox | sil2100: or we could copy the -proposed flash-kernel into the right PPA and then rebuild and test. | 10:50 |
| xnox | sil2100: I am planning to look into it today/tomorrow. I have a lot of SRUs to verify. | 10:50 |
| xnox | but currently doing a battle with greenhouse. | 10:50 |
| laney | don't throw stones | 10:51 |
| laney | </jokes-which-dont-quite-work> | 10:51 |
| sil2100 | xnox: yeah, currently the pi-gadget build doesn't respect *any* PPA, just the main archive (and non-proposed), but I'll try to get that fixed | 10:53 |
| juliank | laney: Is britney not checking build-depends when doing migrations? I'm wondering how grub2-signed migrates if it breaks cd-boot-images-amd64: * cd-boot-images-amd64 build-depends on missing grub-efi-amd64-signed:amd64 (= 1.169+2.04-1ubuntu45) | 10:55 |
| juliank | maybe people hacked that manually | 10:56 |
| juliank | maybe it's only checking the opposite direction | 10:57 |
| laney | juliank: No it's not. Steve disabled that. | 10:59 |
| juliank | OK | 11:00 |
| juliank | makes me sad | 11:00 |
| laney | yeah... | 11:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.13-0ubuntu3] | 13:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.13-0ubuntu3] | 13:15 | |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntu-archive: hello, would you have time to take a look at LP: #1915445, please? (MIR of python-aws-requests-auth) | 14:04 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1915445 in python-aws-requests-auth (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[MIR] python-aws-requests-auth package" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1915445 | 14:04 |
| laney | tjaalton: I rebuilt ubuntu-desktop/focal/amd64, looks good now | 14:06 |
| utkarsh2102 | similarly, LP: #1152187 (last 5 comments), please. | 14:07 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1152187 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "[MIR] systemd" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1152187 | 14:07 |
| laney | tjaalton: do you know why libllvm9 is still being pulled in? | 14:07 |
| tjaalton | laney: yeah I tested it already, is good. and no I don't know about libllvm9.. | 14:22 |
| laney | be good to get it off | 14:24 |
| tjaalton | shouldn't be due to any package dep | 14:25 |
| tjaalton | where can I find the source for the cd build? | 14:34 |
| tjaalton | the tool that builds it | 14:34 |
| tjaalton | dunno if it matters, but there's a typo for the libllvm exclude rule | 14:36 |
| tjaalton | ! Excluding packages from extra: ['lldb-*', 'liblldb-*', 'clang*', 'libclang*', 'libllvm-*', 'libfuzzer-*', 'liblld-*', 'libomp-*', 'lld-*', 'libc++-*', 'libc++abi-*', 'llvm-*'] | 14:36 |
| ubottu | tjaalton: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) | 14:36 |
| tjaalton | ha | 14:36 |
| tjaalton | it says 'libllvm-*' but should be 'libllvm*'? | 14:37 |
| laney | :/ | 14:54 |
| laney | Not sure it's right to fix that, I feel like it would break stuff | 14:54 |
| laney | although I forgot exactly what Extra-Exclude does | 14:54 |
| laney | actually not break, it's just for supported isn't it | 14:55 |
| laney | anyway I think the libllvm9 problem is because we can't really remove things from images, the Task: problem | 14:55 |
| laney | (later images in a stable series, when they have a Task field in the release pocket) | 14:56 |
| sil2100 | waveform: https://github.com/snapcore/pi-gadget/pull/76 <- could you take a look at that? | 15:15 |
| ubottu | Pull 76 in snapcore/pi-gadget "Fix builds using proper image PPA and without proposed" [Open] | 15:15 |
| waveform | sil2100, will do | 15:15 |
| sil2100 | xnox: ^ also, wow, I was not aware we were building pi-gadget snaps with -proposed enabled all the time right now... | 15:15 |
| sil2100 | That didn't sound safe for me, so uh, I'd prefer to get that changed with the PR | 15:15 |
| waveform | sil2100, sure -- I'll cherry-pick across to 20-armhf as well once I've reviewed | 15:16 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, so basically I'm not even sure if our cross-compiling stuff works, so maybe this could be cleaned up - but this is a good start | 15:17 |
| xnox | sil2100: i wonder if anonymouse should check that too.... given his alternative / competing merge proposal. | 15:20 |
| xnox | sil2100: ideally we'd copy the proposed from the host, i.e. if snap build in launchpad is triggered to build with proposed do that; otherwise build without it, etc. | 15:20 |
| waveform | xnox, does https://github.com/snapcore/pi-gadget/pull/73 actually compete with this? | 15:22 |
| ubottu | Pull 73 in snapcore/pi-gadget ".travis.yml: drop the package repositories experimental flag" [Open] | 15:22 |
| sil2100 | xnox: yeah, that's what my PR does, at least for non cross-compiling | 15:25 |
| sil2100 | If one is cross-compiling, I assume the developer can change the cross-sources to enable/disable proposed as they wish | 15:26 |
| sil2100 | waveform, xnox: yeah that PR from Ian wouldn't really help here, it's like a separate thing | 15:27 |
| sil2100 | Since pi-gadget does a few crazy things to pull in the sources in the Makefile | 15:27 |
| waveform | sil2100, I got the impression it's "related" in that it's dealing with the snappy-dev ppa, but doesn't deal with the -proposed stuff | 15:28 |
| doko | laney, just promote the source and the one library package. did you already start? | 15:33 |
| laney | doko: yes, done, I copied what was done in impish | 15:38 |
| sil2100 | waveform: yeah, it's related but also not, since it does add the ppa to the snapcraft.yaml pieces, but it won't have effect on any of the stage_package calls we do - which is what my PR tries to tackle ;) | 15:45 |
| laney | juliank: unknown thing seems to work, will merge it | 15:46 |
| laney | sil2100: you can have staging back | 15:46 |
| juliank | laney: +1 | 15:47 |
| laney | I had to hack runner/autopkgtest to make unknowns btw | 15:47 |
| laney | pinning doesn't work because of that crazy embedded script which calculates the version | 15:47 |
| waveform | sil2100, okay -- all looks sane -- just going to try a couple of builds on a pi and on a PC to double-check then I'll merge and cherry-pick it over to the armhf branch | 15:48 |
| waveform | sil2100, is it worth dealing with anonymouse's at the same time? (given it's related) | 15:49 |
| laney | doh | 15:57 |
| laney | don't `charm build` with uncommitted stuff :( | 15:58 |
| * laney silly | 15:58 | |
| laney | w00t first card done | 16:15 |
| teward | what's the process for requesting a sync blacklist again? | 17:36 |
| teward | got something that probably should be sync blacklisted for a bit | 17:36 |
| seb128 | teward, https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist | 18:34 |
| teward | E:NoAccess so i'll just have to open a bug. and then point AA at it | 18:34 |
| teward | thinking the latest stuff with Audacity deserves a sync blacklist | 18:34 |
| teward | 'cause of GPL violations too | 18:34 |
| teward | just my two cents | 18:34 |
| teward | (even if it's Universe, it's still something we should probably cease syncing at the moment, and just keep copying until a valid 'ng' alternative comes out) | 18:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:21.04.14] | 20:43 | |
| sergiodj | hi there, I'd appreciate if someone could look at https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiodj/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/405209 please. thanks | 21:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!