[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.38.5-1ubuntu2~21.04.1 => 3.38.5-1ubuntu2~21.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus-avro (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.2-2 => 1.2-2ubuntu21.04.1] (no packageset)
[07:58] <sil2100> juliank: hey! The shim set that's in hirsute-proposed, that's all good to go, right?
[07:58] <juliank> sil2100: yeah, xenial one too
[08:01] <sil2100> juliank: okay, what about the fwupd situation? Is that only re: focal's fwupd? Xenial is fine (since it's also still using fwupdate)?
[08:02] <juliank> sil2100: I wasn't aware we had a signed *fwupdate* on xenial
[08:03] <juliank> sil2100: this would break, surely
[08:04] <juliank> sil2100: people told me xenial would be fine because there's no signed fwupd in xenial, I guess nobody checked for a fwupdate
[08:05] <juliank> sil2100: so I guess we have to block-proposed-xenial and discuss :/
[08:05] <juliank> sil2100: hirsute is definitely good to go, though
[08:20] <sil2100> juliank: re: xenial, I guess someone with more experience with how it was done in xenial would have to take a look, since I don't really remember what the situation was there - but I think we still had fwupdate there going on
[08:20] <sil2100> I'll proceed with hirsute for now and wait a bit with xenial just-in-case
[08:25] <cpaelzer> Hi ubuntu-archive people, anyone around to unblock open-iscsi that is in impish-new queue?
[08:26] <cpaelzer> that was a late addition to Debian (we had this for quite a while) under a slightly different name - hence it now is in NEW
[08:26] <sil2100> o/
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [amd64] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [armhf] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [arm64] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [s390x] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [2.1.4-0ubuntu1]
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:21.04.13 => 1:21.04.14] (core)
[09:11] <tjaalton> the focal daily image is from Friday, should it have been built over the weekend or is there some issue holding it back?
[09:12] <laney> tjaalton: llvm-12 needs promoting
[09:12] <laney> it's YOU!
[09:13] <tjaalton> ha! :D
[09:13] <laney> in general you can find the logs under https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu/focal/
[09:13] <tjaalton> but, I'd have thought it was already?
[09:13] <laney> which then link you to the actual log on LP
[09:13] <tjaalton> doko: ^ kernel-packages team has subscribed to the bugs
[09:14] <laney> check rmadison, it's just that it needs to be done in focal too
[09:16] <laney> I can do that
[09:17] <tjaalton> ok that'd be great
[09:17] <laney> or if doko has the command handy that would be easier, so I don't have to work out exactly which packages to prmote
[09:32] <laney> alright nm, I did it, it should be good in an hour or so
[09:32] <tjaalton> sweet, thanks
[09:34] <laney> be good if pg13 could move over so we can drop 11 out of main
[09:45] <tjaalton> annoying how common it is for sru-review to miss spamming/tagging the bugs
[10:35] <sil2100> xnox: hello! Will you have some time to verify LP: #1933093 ? Sadly, from what I see the current pi-gadget build process doesn't respect the snappy image PPA when pulling in flash-kernel
[10:39] <sil2100> ...maybe that's actually something we'd want to fix, let me take a look
[10:50] <xnox> sil2100:  i think it doesn't respect building from -proposed at all. last time i had to hack it locally _a lot_ to make it use something from -proposed.
[10:50] <xnox> sil2100:  or we could copy the -proposed flash-kernel into the right PPA and then rebuild and test.
[10:50] <xnox> sil2100:  I am planning to look into it today/tomorrow. I have a lot of SRUs to verify.
[10:50] <xnox> but currently doing a battle with greenhouse.
[10:51] <laney> don't throw stones

[10:53] <sil2100> xnox: yeah, currently the pi-gadget build doesn't respect *any* PPA, just the main archive (and non-proposed), but I'll try to get that fixed
[10:55] <juliank> laney: Is britney not checking build-depends when doing migrations? I'm wondering how grub2-signed migrates if it breaks cd-boot-images-amd64:  * cd-boot-images-amd64                     build-depends on missing grub-efi-amd64-signed:amd64 (= 1.169+2.04-1ubuntu45)
[10:56] <juliank> maybe people hacked that manually
[10:57] <juliank> maybe it's only checking the opposite direction
[10:59] <laney> juliank: No it's not. Steve disabled that.
[11:00] <juliank> OK
[11:00] <juliank> makes me sad
[11:01] <laney> yeah...
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.13-0ubuntu3]
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.13-0ubuntu3]
[14:04] <utkarsh2102> ubuntu-archive: hello, would you have time to take a look at LP: #1915445, please? (MIR of python-aws-requests-auth)
[14:06] <laney> tjaalton: I rebuilt ubuntu-desktop/focal/amd64, looks good now
[14:07] <utkarsh2102> similarly, LP: #1152187 (last 5 comments), please.
[14:07] <laney> tjaalton: do you know why libllvm9 is still being pulled in?
[14:22] <tjaalton> laney: yeah I tested it already, is good. and no I don't know about libllvm9..
[14:24] <laney> be good to get it off
[14:25] <tjaalton> shouldn't be due to any package dep
[14:34] <tjaalton> where can I find the source for the cd build?
[14:34] <tjaalton> the tool that builds it
[14:36] <tjaalton> dunno if it matters, but there's a typo for the libllvm exclude rule
[14:36] <tjaalton> ! Excluding packages from extra: ['lldb-*', 'liblldb-*', 'clang*', 'libclang*', 'libllvm-*', 'libfuzzer-*', 'liblld-*', 'libomp-*', 'lld-*', 'libc++-*', 'libc++abi-*', 'llvm-*']
[14:36] <tjaalton> ha
[14:37] <tjaalton> it says 'libllvm-*' but should be 'libllvm*'?
[14:54] <laney> :/
[14:54] <laney> Not sure it's right to fix that, I feel like it would break stuff
[14:54] <laney> although I forgot exactly what Extra-Exclude does
[14:55] <laney> actually not break, it's just for supported isn't it
[14:55] <laney> anyway I think the libllvm9 problem is because we can't really remove things from images, the Task: problem
[14:56] <laney> (later images in a stable series, when they have a Task field in the release pocket)
[15:15] <sil2100> waveform: https://github.com/snapcore/pi-gadget/pull/76 <- could you take a look at that?
[15:15] <waveform> sil2100, will do
[15:15] <sil2100> xnox: ^ also, wow, I was not aware we were building pi-gadget snaps with -proposed enabled all the time right now...
[15:15] <sil2100> That didn't sound safe for me, so uh, I'd prefer to get that changed with the PR
[15:16] <waveform> sil2100, sure -- I'll cherry-pick across to 20-armhf as well once I've reviewed
[15:17] <sil2100> Yeah, so basically I'm not even sure if our cross-compiling stuff works, so maybe this could be cleaned up - but this is a good start
[15:20] <xnox> sil2100:  i wonder if anonymouse should check that too.... given his alternative / competing merge proposal.
[15:20] <xnox> sil2100:  ideally we'd copy the proposed from the host, i.e. if snap build in launchpad is triggered to build with proposed do that; otherwise build without it, etc.
[15:22] <waveform> xnox, does https://github.com/snapcore/pi-gadget/pull/73 actually compete with this?
[15:25] <sil2100> xnox: yeah, that's what my PR does, at least for non cross-compiling
[15:26] <sil2100> If one is cross-compiling, I assume the developer can change the cross-sources to enable/disable proposed as they wish
[15:27] <sil2100> waveform, xnox: yeah that PR from Ian wouldn't really help here, it's like a separate thing
[15:27] <sil2100> Since pi-gadget does a few crazy things to pull in the sources in the Makefile
[15:28] <waveform> sil2100, I got the impression it's "related" in that it's dealing with the snappy-dev ppa, but doesn't deal with the -proposed stuff
[15:33] <doko> laney, just promote the source and the one library package. did you already start?
[15:38] <laney> doko: yes, done, I copied what was done in impish
[15:45] <sil2100> waveform: yeah, it's related but also not, since it does add the ppa to the snapcraft.yaml pieces, but it won't have effect on any of the stage_package calls we do - which is what my PR tries to tackle ;)
[15:46] <laney> juliank: unknown thing seems to work, will merge it
[15:46] <laney> sil2100: you can have staging back
[15:47] <juliank> laney: +1
[15:47] <laney> I had to hack runner/autopkgtest to make unknowns btw
[15:47] <laney> pinning doesn't work because of that crazy embedded script which calculates the version
[15:48] <waveform> sil2100, okay -- all looks sane -- just going to try a couple of builds on a pi and on a PC to double-check then I'll merge and cherry-pick it over to the armhf branch
[15:49] <waveform> sil2100, is it worth dealing with anonymouse's at the same time? (given it's related)
[15:57] <laney> doh
[15:58] <laney> don't `charm build` with uncommitted stuff :(
[15:58]  * laney silly
[16:15] <laney> w00t first card done
[17:36] <teward> what's the process for requesting a sync blacklist again?
[17:36] <teward> got something that probably should be sync blacklisted for a bit
[18:34] <seb128> teward, https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+junk/sync-blacklist
[18:34] <teward> E:NoAccess so i'll just have to open a bug.  and then point AA at it
[18:34] <teward> thinking the latest stuff with Audacity deserves a sync blacklist
[18:34] <teward> 'cause of GPL violations too
[18:34] <teward> just my two cents
[18:35] <teward> (even if it's Universe, it's still something we should probably cease syncing at the moment, and just keep copying until a valid 'ng' alternative comes out)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:21.04.14]
[21:21] <sergiodj> hi there, I'd appreciate if someone could look at https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiodj/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/405209 please.  thanks