[06:45] <sakrecoer[bpist]> is ubuntu studio going to continue to ship audacity?
[09:19] <oerheks> sakrecoer[bpist], seems so https://packages.ubuntu.com/impish/ubuntustudio-audio
[09:20] <oerheks> not the newest maybe, but there is an updated snap https://snapcraft.io/audacity
[09:23] <sakrecoer[bpist]> thanks oerheks ! 
[09:23] <sakrecoer[bpist]> i guess i'm fine with removing it manually
[09:23] <sakrecoer[bpist]> really baffled about their new privacy policy. pretty radio active stuff
[09:24] <sakrecoer[bpist]> https://www.audacityteam.org/about/desktop-privacy-notice/
[09:29] <oerheks> interesting read, they do not collect personal stuff..
[09:29] <oerheks> still there is no opt-in/out.
[10:19] <oerheks> bleh, calling it 'spyware' is too much https://fosspost.org/audacity-is-now-a-spyware/
[12:13] <wonko> Calling it spyware is overactive bull. I hate FOSS people sometimes.
[12:47] <sakrecoer[bpist]> sure! but...after reading a few of the issues on their github i'd certainly classify it as Shady AF!
[12:50] <sakrecoer[bpist]> we'll see how long ubuntu will be able to put down the work now required to package it anways: https://github.com/audacity/audacity/issues/625
[15:05] <wonko> dammit, back to jack randomly dying.
[15:41] <Eickmeyer> sakrecoer[bpist]: Audacity is auto-synced from Debian, and you know full well Debian is going to patch the living hell out of it to make sure it doesn't have the telemetry (dfsg and all).
[15:44] <oerheks> Eickmeyer, i surely hope so!
[15:47] <sakrecoer[bpist]> goid point Eickmeyer . given they keep packaging it. that shitstorm unearthed a lot of... ehm... crap. like that 6 years old security vulnerability with a pending PR that none of the maintainers seems to bother about
[15:52] <sakrecoer[bpist]> i know 2 journalists who used it that tell me they are no longer feeling comfortable to. personally i've never had any use for it, and i'm fine with removing it manually :)
[16:04] <Eickmeyer> sakrecoer[bpist]: language, keep it clean.... IRC guidelines and all...
[16:06] <krytarik> I believe "shitstorm" is a proper term by now though.. :P
[16:07] <Eickmeyer> I mean, you're not wrong.
[16:08] <sakrecoer[bpist]> oh, okay... didn't realize any of those words were braking CoC, but i'll keep it in mind
[16:08] <Eickmeyer> !language
[16:09] <Eickmeyer> That basically spells it out.
[16:09] <sakrecoer[bpist]> no it doesn't but whatever.
[16:10] <Eickmeyer> Don't worry too much about it. :)
[16:11] <Eickmeyer> oerheks: dfsg = Debian Free Software Guidelines, in case you didn't know. 
[16:13] <sakrecoer[bpist]> no worries :) 
[22:09] <wonko> I don't know what I changed but now jack refuses to start at 16/3 or 32/3 and will only start 64/3