[04:29] <RAOF> Hey, juliank - is apt ready for release into hirsute? https://launchpad.net/bugs/1925745 is marked block-proposed, but it's unclear to me why.
[04:29] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1925745 in apt (Ubuntu Hirsute) "Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies" [High, Fix Committed]
[05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted initramfs-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.130ubuntu3.13]
[06:57] <juliank> RAOF: I blocked it because autopkgtest is broken, see comment 12. The autopkgtest SRU I still have to verify, and it's not aged enough yet
[06:58] <RAOF> juliank: Ack, thanks.
[06:58] <juliank> It's all a bit stilly as you'll also have to build new hirsute autopkgtest images to get it working again
[07:01] <RAOF> I was a bit confused there, because the apt autopkgtests passed. If it breaks autopkgtest, why would its own autopkgtests pass? :)
[07:18] <tjaalton> yo, anyone around who can add a package to i386 whitelist?
[07:19] <tjaalton> namely egl-wayland needs to be built on i386 as well
[07:20] <tjaalton> RAOF: hey, do you happen to have the required powers ^ ?-)
[07:32] <RAOF> I probably have the required powers, but I don't know how (or whether I'm supposed to)
[07:35] <tjaalton> okay that's fine
[07:35] <tjaalton> I guess laney knows ;)
[07:41] <juliank> RAOF: because I already deployed the fix in the autopkgtest cloud :)
[07:42] <juliank> The cloud got fixed first before I even fixed impish
[08:09] <RAOF> Aaaaah.
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
[09:03] <laney> tjaalton: yeah, does it need an exception or is just regenerating the set enough??
[09:03] <laney> ?*
[09:11] <tjaalton> laney: oh, the latter it seems. there was a build for i386 of the previous version
[09:12] <laney> sec, I've just got to finish something
[09:13] <tjaalton> no rush, someone just reported this by email
[10:20] <laney> tjaalton: how can I see where it's required?
[10:21] <tjaalton> laney: you mean why it's added to the whitelist?
[10:22] <laney> it's needed as a build-dep/dep of something which is already built on i386?
[10:22] <tjaalton> it's needed to provide 32bit libnvidia-egl-wayland
[10:22] <tjaalton> apparently useful for games I'm told
[10:23] <laney> so should be seeded in https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/i386/tree/i386 ?
[10:26] <tjaalton> I guess. don't know why hirsute built it
[10:29] <laney> don't really see where that would have come from
[10:31] <laney> tjaalton: can you add it to that seed with a proper comment? then I can regenerate the set
[10:31] <laney> I guess we need to edit https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-process-for-32-bit-compatibility/ too
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.51.0+dfsg1+llvm-1~exp3ubuntu1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1.51.0+dfsg1+llvm-1~exp3ubuntu1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [1.51.0+dfsg1+llvm-1~exp3ubuntu1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1.51.0+dfsg1+llvm-1~exp3ubuntu1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (impish-proposed) [1.51.0+dfsg1+llvm-1~exp3ubuntu1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (impish-proposed) [1.51.0+dfsg1+llvm-1~exp3ubuntu1]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xtensor [amd64] (impish-proposed) [0.22.0-4]
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xtensor [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [0.22.0-4]
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xtensor [armhf] (impish-proposed) [0.22.0-4]
[10:39] <tjaalton> laney: done
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-desktop3 [source] (hirsute-proposed) [3.38.5-1ubuntu2~21.04.2]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus-avro [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2-2ubuntu21.04.1]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed amtk from i386-whitelist in impish
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed tepl from i386-whitelist in impish
[10:58] <laney> tjaalton: needs to be the binary package name
[10:58] <tjaalton> bah
[10:59] <xnox> vorlon:  can you please _add_ debian-installer to the i386 whitelist? such that i can build it three times, to remove obsolete i386 d-i builds that get copied over, and thus superseed it with html page like it is on the other arches.
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.4.41-4ubuntu3.4]
[12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xtensor-blas [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xtensor-blas [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-2] (no packageset)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xtensor-blas [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-2] (no packageset)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xtensor-blas [riscv64] (impish-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-2] (no packageset)
[14:26] <tjaalton> laney: thanks for fixing it, something else came up while writing the commit msg, duh
[14:27] <laney> np
[14:27] <laney> waiting for germinate now
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu2]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu2]
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1.5.11-0ubuntu2]
[14:45] <laney> tjaalton: it's building now
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added egl-wayland to i386-whitelist in impish
[15:17] <vorlon> xnox: done, d-i is in the i386 whitelist (on a temporary basis)
[15:17] <xnox> vorlon:  horay.
[15:20] <vorlon> tjaalton, laney: I see egl-wayland has been manually re-added to the i386 whitelist; it was built on i386 in December 2020 but then was never referenced by anything so the binaries got deleted again.  What uses this package?  There are no references to it by anything else on i386
[15:21] <vorlon> ah apparently this is all a recent discussion in scrollback :-)
[15:22] <vorlon> ok so this will all be consistent with the next germinate run, hurray
[15:27] <laney> :>
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: debian-installer (impish-proposed/primary) [20101020ubuntu623]
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added debian-installer to i386-whitelist in impish
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1.1]
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (focal-proposed) [2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1~20.04.2]
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gzip [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6-5ubuntu1.1]
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
[17:03] <xnox> vorlon:  debian-installer is in NEW because of course it has to go through new, since we don't remove custom uploads upon series copy up.
[17:03] <tjaalton> vorlon: ah that explains why hirsute had the binary :)
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xtensor-blas [amd64] (impish-proposed) [0.18.0-1]
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xtensor-blas [armhf] (impish-proposed) [0.18.0-2]
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xtensor-blas [amd64] (impish-proposed) [0.18.0-2]
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xtensor-blas [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [0.18.0-2]
[19:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dbus-cpp [armhf] (impish-proposed) [5.0.3-2]
[19:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dbus-cpp [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [5.0.3-2]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-installer [source] (impish-proposed) [20101020ubuntu623]
[19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-installer [s390x] (impish-proposed/none) [20101020ubuntu623] (i386-whitelist)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-installer [i386] (impish-proposed/none) [20101020ubuntu623] (i386-whitelist)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-installer [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/none) [20101020ubuntu623] (i386-whitelist)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-installer [arm64] (impish-proposed/none) [20101020ubuntu623] (i386-whitelist)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-installer [armhf] (impish-proposed/none) [20101020ubuntu623] (i386-whitelist)
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debian-installer [amd64] (impish-proposed/none) [20101020ubuntu623] (i386-whitelist)
[19:48] <vorlon> xnox: do these binaries need accepted?
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-installer [amd64] (impish-proposed) [20101020ubuntu623]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-installer [armhf] (impish-proposed) [20101020ubuntu623]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-installer [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [20101020ubuntu623]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-installer [arm64] (impish-proposed) [20101020ubuntu623]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-installer [s390x] (impish-proposed) [20101020ubuntu623]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-installer [i386] (impish-proposed) [20101020ubuntu623]
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-base (hirsute-proposed/main) [4.5ubuntu5.3 => 4.5ubuntu5.4] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-base (groovy-proposed/main) [4.5ubuntu4 => 4.5ubuntu4.1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-base (focal-proposed/main) [4.5ubuntu3.6 => 4.5ubuntu3.7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-base (bionic-proposed/main) [4.5ubuntu1.6 => 4.5ubuntu1.7] (core)
[21:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvme-cli (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.12-5 => 1.12-5ubuntu0.1] (core)
[21:30] <vorlon> xnox: now that I think of it, though, we don't build an i386 *live* installer either, so why would we not just address this by deleting http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/impish/main/installer-i386/ ?
[21:35] <utkarsh2102> vorlon: hey, can you please remove i386 binaries of multipath-tools from 0.8.5-2ubuntu1? cf: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#multipath-tools
[21:37] <cjwatson> vorlon: IIRC if you try it'll just come back in J due to the DB model for custom uploads being, err, not very good
[21:38] <vorlon> cjwatson: ah
[21:39] <utkarsh2102> also, while at it, could you please take a look at LP: #1915445, and wave your magic wand? :)
[21:39] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1915445 in python-aws-requests-auth (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[MIR] python-aws-requests-auth package" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1915445
[21:39] <vorlon> utkarsh2102: done
[21:39] <utkarsh2102> vorlon: thank you!
[21:39] <vorlon> utkarsh2102: the first one is done; the second one I'll look at now
[21:39] <utkarsh2102> great, thank you!
[21:55] <utkarsh2102> hey, last thing I was waiting on is LP: #1152187, but just promoting systemd-container in Bionic, rest is all good!
[21:55] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1152187 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "[MIR] systemd" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1152187
[21:55] <utkarsh2102> in case you have time^ (otherwise no rush!)
[21:55] <utkarsh2102> thanks again, I'll be afk now! \o
[22:07] <vorlon> utkarsh2102: python-aws-requests-auth doesn't show on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html ; is the seeds change not yet landed?
[22:08] <vorlon> utkarsh2102: ah - the seed lists python-aws-requests-auth but this is a source package, it must list a binary package name
[22:08] <vorlon> I'll fix it up
[22:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-aws-requests-auth (hirsute-updates/universe) [0.4.3-1 => 0.4.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-aws-requests-auth [sync] (hirsute-updates) [0.4.3-1]
[22:48] <vorlon> utkarsh2102: for the record, there is nothing about the state of bug #1152187 that would have put it on the archive admin team radar had you not pinged directly; not only do we not use the MIR process for binary promotions, we also only look at component mismatches for the devel series
[22:48] <ubottu> Bug 1152187 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "[MIR] systemd" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1152187
[22:52] <xnox> vorlon:  i am happy to change it to build empty tarball on i386
[22:52] <xnox> vorlon:  i think i need version dir, and symlink dir, to mimick enough for it to be gone forever.
[22:52] <vorlon> xnox: seems preferable over having a page wrongly telling people to use a non-existent live installer for i386
[22:53] <xnox> vorlon:  do you want to accept this, such that i can iterate on it? as far as i recall i need to do 3 uploads anyway to clear the i386 dir.
[22:53] <xnox> and obviously i can do 4 uploads.
[22:54] <xnox> you did already never mind.
[22:54] <xnox> vorlon:  thank you and will make it an empty dir on i386.
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [0.96.24.32.16 => 0.96.24.32.17] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (focal-proposed/main) [0.99.9.6 => 0.99.9.7] (core)