[02:13] <DarkTrick> **Q** @ package update: I've migrated the source code package `gjiten` to GTK 3. What should I do to get my changes into the Ubuntu repos? Currently, my repo is not "connected" to the source code for the repos
[12:51] <schopin> Anyone willing to sponsor LP #1934988 ? It is a relatively straightforward upstream version upgrade.
[12:51] <schopin> slyon: ^
[12:53] <slyon> schopin: o/ good work taking care about the s390-tools-signed! I will be looking into this soonish
[12:54] <schopin> Well, the s390-tools package wouldn't install without them, so it's not like I had much of a choice :P
[15:04] <seb128> slyon, hey, is there any chance you could help to see what's the issue with the new n-m and systemd/netplan|armhf autopkgtests?
[15:06] <slyon> seb128: yes. I want to look into some of those systemd autopkgtest soon anyways, probably later this week
[15:06] <seb128> slyon, thanks!
[16:52] <ItzSwirlz> bdmurray, laney: Can you guys do me a favor and push https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nemo/+bug/1861968 to updates? Fantu has the patches do work + I want to patch something else
[16:52] <ItzSwirlz> (something else in nemo)
[16:55] <bdmurray> ItzSwirlz: something currently being in -proposed shouldn't prevent your from uploading something to the unapproved queue. Also l_aney is not on the Ubuntu SRU team.
[16:56] <ItzSwirlz> Okay, cool. I just didn't want to backlog the queue and cause any confusion :)
[16:56] <bdmurray> ItzSwirlz: the reason it hasn't been released yet for Focal is nobody changed the tags on the bug to indicate that the verification was done. Additionally, it seems like verification has not been done on Bionic.
[16:58] <ItzSwirlz> He says no regression found, hes been using the patch for months as of february
[16:59] <bdmurray> No, he says he tested his build with the same patch from a PPA which doesn't quality as verification b/c its not using the package from the official archive.
[17:13] <jawn-smith> kenvandine: how do you feel about temporarily disabling ubuntu-report in desktop images? golang does not yet have support for c-shared libraries on risc-v, though I have submitted a feature request for it.
[17:13] <ItzSwirlz> bdmurray: i'll shoot him an email thanks
[19:03] <teward> !dmb-ping
[21:55] <phibs> I currently use debmirror and want to support by-hash for my clients, is there some post mirror generation I can perform since debmirror doesn't support it or any other workarounds?
[21:55] <phibs> TIA
[22:36] <phibs> http://mirror.cogentco.com/pub/linux/ubuntu/dists/focal/main/binary-amd64/by-hash/SHA256/
[22:36] <phibs> really not even clear what that stuff is
[23:23] <tumbleweed> phibs: it's the package lists and other metadata, but allowing clients to avoid seeing 404s / mismatches during mirror syncs. Does --rsync-extra not sync them?
[23:35] <phibs> oh you think adding rsync extra will make debmirror grab it ?
[23:36] <phibs> so it'll http fetch the things, then grab extra stuff ?  (I've not seen anywhere saying debmirror will fetch them)
[23:36] <phibs> I'd love to just generate them myself if possible