[01:10] <callmepk> good morning
[05:41] <jibel> Good morning 
[05:45] <duflu> Hi jibel 
[05:49] <jibel> Hi duflu 
[06:38] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:38] <seb128> hey oSoMoN, how are you?
[06:38] <seb128> oh, and goood morning desktopers :)
[06:42] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN and seb128 
[06:45] <jpnurmi> good morning :)
[06:45] <callmepk> hi jibel duflu oSoMoN seb128 jpnurmi 
[06:46] <seb128> hey duflu, jpnurmi, callmepk, how are you?
[06:46] <seb128> lut jibel 
[06:46] <duflu> Morning jpnurmi and afternoon callmepk 
[06:46] <callmepk> seb128 I am okay, how are you?
[06:47] <duflu> seb128, tired, reworking old code and have a meeting soon so not exciting. You?
[06:49] <seb128> I'm alright thanks!
[06:54] <oSoMoN> salut seb128! not fully awake yet, but I'm alright, and you?
[06:54] <oSoMoN> hey duflu, jpnurmi, callmepk 
[06:55] <seb128> oSoMoN, similarly :)
[06:59] <KGB-2> gnome-control-center ubuntu/master f97d30f Sebastien Bacher debian/patches/ubuntu/lock-Add-Lock-Screen-on-Suspend-option.patch * Reference launchpad bug for the lock-on-suspend patch * https://deb.li/ikQcl
[07:05] <seb128> tseliot, hey, did you notice that your ubuntu-drivers-common upload failed to build on most arches?
[07:10] <didrocks> hey
[07:10] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks 
[07:10] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN 
[07:14] <jibel> salut seb128 didrocks oSoMoN 
[07:14] <jibel> hi callmepk jpnurmi 
[07:17] <GunnarHj> Good morning!
[07:17] <GunnarHj> $ apt depends gnome-shell | grep 'desktop-icons '
[07:17] <GunnarHj>   Breaks: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (<< 21.04)
[07:17] <GunnarHj> But version 21.04 does not exist. Is that a mistake?
[07:17] <didrocks> salut jibel, GunnarHj 
[07:18] <GunnarHj> o/ didrocks
[07:24] <GunnarHj> Trevinho: ^
[07:32] <seb128> lut jibel didrocks 
[07:32] <seb128> GunnarHj, the point is that the new shell is breaking old extensions and they need to be adapted
[07:33] <seb128> GunnarHj, when we flag them as compatible we should bump the version
[07:33] <seb128> or update the breaks
[07:33] <didrocks> hello seb128 
[07:41] <duflu> Hi didrocks 
[07:45] <didrocks> afternoon duflu 
[08:01] <laney> o/
[08:03] <duflu> Hi laney 
[08:03] <duflu> Also morning GunnarHj 
[08:06] <KGB-0> gnome-settings-daemon ubuntu/focal f7e2e9d Sebastien Bacher * pushed 24 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/ZEr1
[08:06] <KGB-0> gnome-settings-daemon ubuntu/focal 69493ff Goran Vidović po/hr.po * Update Croatian translation * https://deb.li/3LATN
[08:06] <KGB-0> gnome-settings-daemon ubuntu/focal 3db025d Benjamin Berg .gitlab-ci.yml * ci: Update to adjust fdo template changes and switch to rawhide * https://deb.li/0zYV
[08:06] <KGB-0> gnome-settings-daemon ubuntu/focal 7485182 Goran Vidović po/hr.po * Update Croatian translation * https://deb.li/3VDuh
[08:06] <KGB-0> gnome-settings-daemon ubuntu/focal 9ba946e Goran Vidović po/hr.po * Update Croatian translation * https://deb.li/DZln
[08:06] <KGB-0> gnome-settings-daemon ubuntu/focal d7a6f19 Goran Vidović po/hr.po * Update Croatian translation * https://deb.li/3R8a7
[08:08] <didrocks> hey laney 
[08:09] <duflu> How long has Launchpad had comment editing before I noticed?!
[08:10] <laney> hey duflu didrocks 
[08:10] <seb128> hey laney, how are you?
[08:11] <laney> duflu: https://blog.launchpad.net/general/comment-editing-is-now-possible
[08:11] <laney> not that long ;-)
[08:13] <seb128> duflu, https://code.launchpad.net/~pappacena/launchpad/+git/launchpad/+merge/402604 apparently since may
[08:13] <GunnarHj> seb128: Ok, I see. The immediate goal in this case is to fix bug #1917010 for focal, so I started with the dev version to follow the SRU procedure. And it just migrated even if it's uninstallable. :)
[08:13] <laney> moin seb128, I'm alright
[08:13] <seb128> GunnarHj, it should be installable in impish, that's the shell version from proposed that breaks on it no?
[08:14] <GunnarHj> seb128: Yes. But that will soon migrate, or?
[08:14] <seb128> GunnarHj, that will not migrate while it's breaking things
[08:15] <seb128> GunnarHj, but I think we are probably going to delete or demote to propose extensions to unblock the update
[08:15] <seb128> laney, did you notice https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kylin-burner/3.0.10-1 ? I've a feeling that's now how it was supposed to be done
[08:16] <laney> no, I copied it to that silo
[08:16] <laney> I wonder if LP will let that one be published
[08:16] <GunnarHj> seb128: Ok. Suppose the SRU team can be talked into fixing focal bugs even on packages which were deleted in impish.
[08:16] <laney> guess we'll see
[08:17] <seb128> laney, are we still missing pieces or does it mean that's ready to land now?
[08:17] <laney> and I told handsome_feng I was doing it like that too, lost in translation I suppose
[08:17] <laney> it is ready, I was hoping the other stuff would move out first
[08:17] <laney> but publish can be pressed whenever
[08:17] <seb128> we can try to get the other things moving today if you prefer
[08:18] <seb128> gtk4 migrated
[08:18] <seb128> so we are down to having foundations fix update-manager to require the proper version of the gtk binding so autopkgtests are green
[08:18] <seb128> and having to demote extensions
[08:18] <laney> right
[08:18] <seb128> then maybe other things? unsure if the current i386 breakage is going to get in the way somehow
[08:21] <laney> start by demoting all that stuff
[08:21] <laney> make sure you file a block-proposed-impish bug for them
[08:23] <handsome_feng> laney: Hi, Did I miss something?
[08:25] <GunnarHj> hey duflu, looks like I messed with "your" package again. :) Hope I didn't mess it up too much.
[08:25] <duflu> GunnarHj, you touched it last ;)
[08:25] <duflu> I was only babysitting it while there were obvious bugs
[08:26] <handsome_feng> laney:  kylin-burner is waitting for tracker 3, should I not sync this package now?
[08:26] <GunnarHj> duflu: I'd say you did all the real work. I merely fixed the repo/package stuff.
[08:28] <laney> handsome_feng: I was doing it all in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4580/+packages
[08:28] <laney> so we didn't need to have it in the archive yet, but it's ok really, don't worry about it
[08:30] <laney> hi btw :>
[08:30] <handsome_feng> laney: oh, got it, Oh, got it, I mistakenly thought that passing it directly to archive would reduce your work
[08:47] <didrocks> github copilot:
[08:47] <didrocks> I write: "if args.rootfs_ppa and args.rootfses:"
[08:47] <didrocks> suggested completion: "logging.error("--rootfs-ppa and --rootfses are mutually exclusive"); sys.exit(1)"
[08:47] <didrocks> just before, I wrote:
[08:47] <didrocks> "if not selected_wslID:"
[08:48] <didrocks> suggestioned completion:
[08:48] <didrocks>         logging.error("Unable to find a WSL release matching %s", args.wslID)
[08:48] <didrocks>         sys.exit(1)
[08:48] <didrocks> check that I wrote selected_wslID and not args.wslID (selected_wslID=args.wslID.lower())
[08:48] <didrocks> and it selected the user input for the user message
[08:49] <didrocks> this is really amazing
[08:49] <seb128> sounds like they are doing smart things indeed
[08:57] <tseliot> seb128, it doesn't look like something I could've possibly broken: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/gHGVB9GRgx/
[08:58] <seb128> tseliot, any idea where the breakage could be? is that using umockdev? or kernel?
[09:00] <seb128> laney, is it easy to stop https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/impish/ubuntu-canary/+build/287310 and retry it in a bit?
[09:00] <seb128> I wanted a package published for that build but it's going to take another 10 min :/
[09:01] <laney> seb128: might as well just try another one when that one is done I think
[09:01] <seb128> k
[09:02] <seb128> maybe with some luck it fetches package index late enough that the package could be published still, let's see
[09:12] <tseliot> seb128, it probably comes from calling apt-get install 
[09:16] <seb128> tseliot, could be what mwhudson was refering to earlier
[09:21] <tseliot> seb128, yes, I think he was referring to the same problem
[11:44] <Trevinho> GunnarHj: no, not a mistake... It must break it... There's no fixed version, so need to break it 
[11:48] <GunnarHj> Trevinho: Got it. s_eb128 helped me understand the order of things.
[12:00] <laney> seb128: ready for that retry now?
[12:01] <laney> rebuild*
[12:40] <seb128> laney, yes! thank you :)
[13:31] <laney> (post lunch) it iz running
[13:31] <seb128> laney, thx!
[13:33] <ricotz> hello desktopers :), ceph/amd64 is stuck in NEW queue -- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/16.2.5-0ubuntu2
[13:34] <ricotz> which is part of the openldap transition
[13:42] <seb128> ricotz, hey thanks for pointing it out
[13:43] <ricotz> this -proposed situation isn't getting better though :(
[13:43] <ricotz> e.g. apache2
[14:04] <seb128> ricotz, well, gtk4 migrated and gnome-shell is ready once foundations fixes update-manager autopkgtests
[14:05] <seb128> so there are some improvements :)
[14:05] <ricotz> seb128, oh, I thought this is entangled with openldap via e-d-s and libgweather?
[14:06] <seb128> by ready I mean candidate
[14:06] <seb128> which it was not before
[14:06] <seb128> I'm just pointing out that while there are some new problems we are also making progress on other fronts
[14:06] <seb128> we will eventually get there
[14:06] <ricotz> yeah of course :)
[14:07] <ricotz> I am desperately waiting for being able to upload libreoffice 7.2.0 :)
[14:08] <seb128> yeah, a bit longer, hopefully we are getting there
[15:09] <ricotz> seb128, hmm, autopkgtests fail on a PPA build which is using -proposed and actually creates deps provided in -proposed only?
[15:11] <ricotz> "Depends: libldap-2.5-0 (>= 2.5.4) but it is not installable"
[15:11] <ricotz> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-impish-ricotz-ppa/impish/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20210715_144139_739a6@/log.gz
[15:26] <seb128> ricotz, you might need a trigger on the proposed version of use all_proposed=1
[15:28] <ricotz> seb128, how can I do that?
[15:49] <seb128> ricotz, see 'How to re-run autopkgtests with dependencies on other packages in the proposed pocket' on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration#autopkgtests
[15:49] <seb128> but basically add  &trigger=SRCPKG/VERSION to the url
[15:52] <ricotz> seb128, thank you
[15:55] <ricotz> doesn't work "You submitted an invalid request: openldap/2.5.5+dfsg-1~exp1ubuntu1 is not published in PPA ricotz/ppa impish"
[15:57] <laney> urlencode it
[15:58] <ricotz> I think if the url is valid therefore the correct error message
[16:00] <seb128> you might need to copy that package into your ppa?
[16:02] <ricotz> this might work
[16:03] <ricotz> I will try it
[16:28] <ricotz> seems to work :)
[17:47] <dust> when there ll be updates to firefox and thunderbird?
[17:52] <seb128> dust, which serie and version are you asking about?
[17:52] <dust> seb128, the normal series
[17:55] <ogra> dust, which ubuntu version are you on 
[17:55] <dust> 21.04
[17:55] <ogra> (which is, i believe, what seb wanted to know 😉 )
[17:55] <ricotz> I think the security-team is aware of the builds for firefox 90.0 and thunderbird 78.12.0 waiting to be copied :)
[17:56] <dust> k
[17:56] <ricotz> they are ready at https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ubuntu/ppa
[17:56] <ogra> if you want it faster, use the snaps of both 😉
[17:56] <dust> snap sux...
[17:57] <dust> i totally dislike it...
[17:57] <ogra> well, your choice ... 
[17:58] <ogra> (and off topic here)
[17:58] <dust> as is the distro...
[17:59] <ogra> ?
[17:59] <dust> ogra, u said something about choice...
[18:23]  * ogra isnt sure how that is relevant