| blackboxsw | sil2100 woot! figured it'd be worth catching you with a request :) | 01:47 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-somerville-gendry-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 03:22 | |
| jamespage | bdmurray: hey - could we get the focal update for ceph thats in proposed released to updates today? | 07:12 |
| jamespage | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1933410 | 07:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1933410 in ceph (Ubuntu Focal) "[SRU] ceph 15.2.13" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 07:12 |
| jamespage | would be good to get that clear this week if possible | 07:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (hirsute-proposed/main) [3.38.1-3ubuntu3 => 3.38.1-3ubuntu3.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 08:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.36.1-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 08:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu8 => 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu8.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 08:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04 => 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 08:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (focal-proposed/main) [15.4-0ubuntu5 => 15.4-0ubuntu7] (core) (sync) | 09:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (hirsute-proposed/main) [15.4-0ubuntu5 => 15.4-0ubuntu7] (core) (sync) | 09:33 | |
| juliank | sil2100: could you approve the signing tarball for shim in impish? | 09:33 |
| juliank | * tarballs | 09:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (bionic-proposed/main) [15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2 => 15.4-0ubuntu7] (core) (sync) | 09:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (xenial-proposed/main) [15.4-0ubuntu5 => 15.4-0ubuntu7] (core) (sync) | 09:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-gendry-meta [sync] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-gendry-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [20.04~ubuntu1] (canonical-oem-metapackages) | 10:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-gendry-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1] | 10:36 | |
| sil2100 | juliank: done o/ | 10:51 |
| juliank | sil2100: thanks! | 10:52 |
| schopin | Hi there :) Is there an archive admin that could look at and possibly unblock the s390-tools-signed upload ? | 12:16 |
| sil2100 | schopin: hello! Is it an SRU, or for impish? | 12:27 |
| sil2100 | Ok, I saw some binary in the NEW queue, approved that for now | 12:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (impish-proposed) [2.17.0-0ubuntu1] | 12:28 | |
| schopin | sil2100: thanks :) | 12:31 |
| jawn-smith | sil2100: can we turn on unmatched daily builds for focal? | 13:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.40.5 => 1.40.6] (core) | 13:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.40.5 => 1.40.6] (core) | 13:54 | |
| juliank | ^ first shim-signed 1.40.6 did not get -v passed during changelog, so reuploaded | 13:55 |
| juliank | cjwatson: something odd seems to be going on, sil2100 accepted (in impish) shim signing tarballs ~3hours ago for both amd64 and arm64, but arm64 are still not published | 14:03 |
| juliank | I think we had this before | 14:03 |
| cjwatson | juliank: will get back to you after this meeting | 14:03 |
| xnox | laney: juliank: vorlon: is there NBS report for -proposed ? aka old binaries left. | 14:09 |
| * juliank leaves that to AAs | 14:10 | |
| xnox | i thought it was https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/ over here.... but that's empty | 14:12 |
| seb128 | there isn't afaik, but that would be handy since those are a reason for things not migrating | 14:13 |
| laney | not as far as I know | 14:13 |
| laney | usually it's reported on excuses in a more or less cryptic fashion | 14:13 |
| xnox | i'll try to make something. cause at the moment all of kernels are stuck because of that. | 14:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (hirsute-proposed/main) [4.1-1ubuntu1.1 => 4.1-1ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 14:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (groovy-proposed/main) [4.1-1ubuntu0.20.10.2 => 4.1-1ubuntu0.20.10.3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 14:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [4.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.2 => 4.1-1ubuntu0.20.04.3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 14:50 | |
| cjwatson | juliank: So where were you looking for the signing tarballs? | 14:57 |
| juliank | cjwatson: So the build log says: | 14:58 |
| juliank | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/548571056/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-amd64.shim-signed_1.49_BUILDING.txt.gz | 14:58 |
| juliank | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/548571056/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-amd64.shim-signed_1.49_BUILDING.txt.gz | 14:58 |
| cjwatson | I wonder if you made the same mistake I did when first looking | 14:58 |
| juliank | um | 14:58 |
| juliank | Downloading http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/dists/impish/main/signed/shim-amd64/current/signed.tar.gz ... found | 14:58 |
| juliank | Extracting 15.4-0ubuntu5 ... | 14:58 |
| juliank | I tried from an instance in scalingstack (stg-proposed-migration) and got the right one, before that build: | 14:58 |
| juliank | $ curl -s http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/dists/impish/main/signed/shim-arm64/current/signed.tar.gz | tar tz | head -1 | 14:58 |
| juliank | 15.4-0ubuntu7/ | 14:58 |
| juliank | hmm wrong build log | 14:59 |
| juliank | but same idea :D | 14:59 |
| juliank | So it seems to be there on anonster, but then it still downloads the old one on the builder, so is there a proxy in between with caching? | 14:59 |
| juliank | The right log is at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/548598797/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-arm64.shim-signed_1.49_BUILDING.txt.gz | 15:00 |
| cjwatson | Not on amd64 | 15:00 |
| juliank | cjwatson: Right, amd64 fetch was OK, arm64 one is broken/delayed | 15:00 |
| juliank | cjwatson: I typoed at the top :) | 15:00 |
| cjwatson | OK, so there is a proxy for bos02 builds | 15:01 |
| cjwatson | It's part of the LFP mitigations for running builds on the wrong side of the Atlantic | 15:01 |
| cjwatson | It might be a good idea to have the download script send cache-busting headers | 15:01 |
| cjwatson | "Pragma: no-cache" at least | 15:01 |
| juliank | it knows the version, so why it requests current/ instead of version/ is another topic | 15:02 |
| cjwatson | Or else fetch by version, indeed | 15:02 |
| cjwatson | If it fetched by version then it would probably just work | 15:02 |
| juliank | maybe there is an issue with encoding of ~ or something | 15:02 |
| cjwatson | I wouldn't have thought so | 15:03 |
| cjwatson | It may just have been based on previous code that didn't know the version ... | 15:03 |
| cjwatson | (The mistake I made when first looking for whether it was published was to look on archive.ubuntu.com, which caused me to scratch my head for a bit until I realized I needed to look at ports.ubuntu.com in this case) | 15:03 |
| cjwatson | https://wiki.canonical.com/InformationInfrastructure/ISO/ScalingStack#BOS01.2FBOS02_LFP_workaround (internal only) if you want the sad story of why the proxy is there | 15:04 |
| * cjwatson files a bug on universe: c is too small | 15:05 | |
| juliank | cjwatson: the archive.u.c thing also confused me for a bit, yes :D | 15:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [4.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.2 => 4.1-1ubuntu0.18.04.3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 15:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmbim [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.24.8-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmbim [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.24.8-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmbim [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.24.8-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmbim [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.24.8-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.28.6-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.28.6-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [1.28.6-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmbim [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.24.8-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmbim [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [1.24.8-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.28.6-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.28.6-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmbim [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.24.8-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.28.6-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libqmi [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.28.6-1~20.04] | 15:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.40.6] | 15:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [amd64] (impish-proposed) [16.2.5-0ubuntu2] | 15:27 | |
| sil2100 | juliank: oh my aptdaemon ADT tests in hirsute started failing in release, huh | 15:33 |
| juliank | sil2100: they are fairly flake | 15:33 |
| juliank | * flaky | 15:33 |
| xnox | sil2100: without https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1936370 we cannot roll kernel to v5.11 in focal for the point release. | 15:36 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1936370 in u-boot (Ubuntu Impish) "u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk" [Undecided, In Progress] | 15:36 |
| juliank | ooh that's the parser bug in aptdaemon | 15:38 |
| juliank | sil2100: so it fails because the ubuntu-advantge-tools config file for apt is missing ; | 15:38 |
| juliank | sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1930741 | 15:39 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1930741 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) "20apt-esm-hook.conf is missing semicolons at end of option" [Undecided, New] | 15:39 |
| juliank | maybe ping server to fix it | 15:40 |
| bdmurray | juliank: I think there is a u-a-t SRU in the queue already | 15:42 |
| juliank | hopefully it fixes it | 15:42 |
| juliank | it does, but the bug isn't mentioned in the changelog :/ | 15:42 |
| juliank | (or the change for that matter) | 15:42 |
| bdmurray | + * Cherrypick upstream pr #1681 to unbreak many migrations. LP: #1930741 | 15:43 |
| ubottu | Bug 1681 in Launchpad itself "Viewing a translation page fails in unix2newlines" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681 | 15:43 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1930741 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) "20apt-esm-hook.conf is missing semicolons at end of option" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1930741 | 15:43 |
| juliank | ooh down there | 15:48 |
| sil2100 | xnox: oh shit, lovely | 16:35 |
| blackboxsw | hrm, yes we have a xnox's fix queued for 1930741 in the current u-a-t upload that is awaiting -proposed | 16:46 |
| blackboxsw | juliank: thank you for adding the missing "regression-update" tag, it prompted me to read about the meaning.https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Regressions | 16:49 |
| sil2100 | Will review that in a moment! | 17:15 |
| sil2100 | blackboxsw: hey! Reviewing ubuntu-advantage-tools right now | 18:08 |
| blackboxsw | excellent sil2100~ | 18:09 |
| sil2100 | Looking at the debian/control changes, any reason why the "| distro-info (= 0.14ubuntu0.2)" dep is = and not the usual >=? I know xenial is frozen basically, but what if there's a new distro-info package pushed? | 18:09 |
| sil2100 | blackboxsw: ^ | 18:11 |
| blackboxsw | sil2100 re-reading that commit and the original Bug now | 18:11 |
| sil2100 | Since I can understand why the versioned dep and why the | alternative has been given, but I think it's not correct to hard-depend on another package who's version can change with security updates | 18:15 |
| sbeattie | we have pushed distro-info updates to the ESM archives, IIRC. | 18:16 |
| sbeattie | or at least the data files. | 18:17 |
| blackboxsw | sil2100 I think the issue here is that on Bionic for instance we need to require at least (>= 0.18ubuntu0.18.04.1) | 18:19 |
| blackboxsw | if we don't match that contraint on bionic, but bionic distro-info is at 0.18 we would still match the 2nd clause | 18:20 |
| blackboxsw | via the match >= 0.14ubuntu0.2 | 18:20 |
| blackboxsw | so maybe it's worth a conflicts 0.18 clause? | 18:20 |
| blackboxsw | to make sure a too old bionic distro-info is disallowed ? | 18:21 |
| sil2100 | blackboxsw: yeah, I think in this case that seems more appropriate, as otherwise we force u-a-t to need a re-upload everytime a new distro-info is released | 18:21 |
| sil2100 | Anyway, I'll reject it for now, since as-is this doesn't feel like the right way to solve this! | 18:26 |
| blackboxsw | sil2100: I'm not really sure how we'd express that in debian/control? a new Conflicts: ubuntu-distri (=0.18) ? | 18:26 |
| blackboxsw | I just don't want to reject installation on anything but known difficient ubuntu-distro | 18:27 |
| sil2100 | hm, wonder if maybe The dep for >= 0.18ubuntu0.18.04.1 + a Breaks or Conflicts < 0.14ubuntu0.2 would do the trick? | 18:33 |
| blackboxsw | basically, I'm not sure how to properly express Requires: distro-info (>= 0.18ubuntu0.18.04.1) | distro-info (>= 0.14ubuntu0.2 && < 0.18) .... yeah | 18:36 |
| lucasmoura | sorry sil2100, I may be missing something, but if the dep is >= 0.18ubuntu0.18.04.1, wouldn't we fail on xenial ? | 18:36 |
| lucasmoura | Also, since we have new versions of that package published to esm, is there any situation were we would upload a new version of that package directly into updates/security ? | 18:37 |
| blackboxsw | "wouldn't we fail on xenial" ... we would not match that dep on xenial so safe on the first part.... but if xenial bumps to a version 0.14ubuntu0.3 then ua-tools would also not match/succeed to meet the requires declaration | 18:37 |
| lucasmoura | that's fair, my only doubt here is if that update is feasible | 18:38 |
| lucasmoura | since it seems we are now uploading that package into the esm pocket | 18:38 |
| blackboxsw | lucasmoura: sbeattie mentioned above that they have uploaded distro-info to esm archives before. so it's possible that a xenial upgrade on distro-info can/will occur | 18:38 |
| blackboxsw | "we have pushed distro-info updates to the ESM archives, IIRC.... or at least the data files" | 18:39 |
| lucasmoura | oh, I thought this meant we were updating it on the esm pocket only now | 18:39 |
| lucasmoura | If not, my mistake here | 18:39 |
| blackboxsw | if updated in distro-info is updated in esm pocket... new ua-tools would fail to install on xenial if distro-info goes > 0.14ubuntu0.2. which is an "if" but it could happen. In that case our strict requires will break and disallow either ua-tools or distro-info from being installed | 18:43 |
| blackboxsw | sil2100: what do you think about us generating a xenial-only SRU that would make that contraint flexible at just Requires: distro-info (>= >= 0.14ubuntu0.2) I think the problem comes from us trying to share the same debian/control on all releases | 18:50 |
| blackboxsw | that way we can reject just the xenial SRU and sort the proper/specific deb/control for that release | 18:50 |
| blackboxsw | "hm, wonder if maybe The dep for >= 0.18ubuntu0.18.04.1 + a Breaks or Conflicts < 0.14ubuntu0.2 would do the trick?" Hrm.... the problem with only expressing >= 0.18ubuntu0.18.04.1 is that Xenial will not have a deb match clause that could be met as xenial-updates currently sits at 0.14ubutu0.2. | 18:55 |
| sil2100 | blackboxsw: sorry, yeah, I'm a bit AFKish now but yes, if that's acceptable from your POV that's best, as this is how we do it for all other projects - per-series delta | 19:39 |
| sil2100 | So I would love that the most actually | 19:39 |
| blackboxsw | +1 sil2100 thanks let's reject Xenial, and we are talking about uploading to X ua-t with a specific xenial-only d/control file since we keep bumping against this complexity problem | 19:40 |
| blackboxsw | We'll put up another xenial upload with this fix so we don't have to deal with that X > 0.14 and B > 0.18 ranges | 19:40 |
| blackboxsw | and we'll work toward separation of d/control, on B and greater in future releases | 19:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [27.2~16.04.1] | 20:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dwarves-dfsg [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.21-0ubuntu1~ubuntu20.10.1] | 20:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mutter [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.38.3-2ubuntu0.20.10.1] | 20:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libbpf [sync] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.0-1ubuntu1~ubuntu20.10.1] | 20:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sosreport [source] (groovy-proposed) [4.1-1ubuntu0.20.10.3] | 20:57 | |
| vorlon | xnox: right, no NBS for -proposed, just gets worked out via update_excuses | 21:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!