[06:57] <RAOF> Ok. I need some help with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/umockdev/+bug/1934995
[06:58] <RAOF> Mir's umockdev-using tests fail with stack smashing on ppc64el using the umockdev from impish.
[06:58] <RAOF> Mir's umockdev-using tests pass on ppc64el using the umockdev from hirsute.
[06:58] <RAOF> Mir's umockdev-using tests fail with stack smashing on ppc64el if you rebuild hirsute's umockdev in a hirsute schroot.
[07:00] <RAOF> Rebuilding umockdev with the versions of binutils, gcc-10, and valac that built the version of 0.15.4-1 in hirsute results in a package that will still fail Mir's tests.
[07:00] <RAOF> I am low on hypotheses!
[07:06] <RAOF> (And I'm going to pick up Zoë now, but please dump any hypotheses in backscroll 😺)
[07:47] <schopin> bdmurray, ginggs: thanks a lot, will do the URL next time :)
[07:56] <ginggs> schopin: yw!
[09:13] <schopin> slyon: regarding LP: #1914740, are there any plan for systemd 249 in impish or should I backport the patch in 248 ?
[09:15] <slyon> schopin: there is not plan for systemd v249 in impish, so a backport would be best
[12:12] <rbasak> ddstreet: thank you for volunteering!
[12:12] <rbasak> What I have in mind is some kind of continuation of the Ubuntu Backports Team
[12:13] <rbasak> So, I imagine you joining the team, and starting off by following their existing processes, but also driving whatever changes you think are appropriate to chat process.
[12:13] <ddstreet> sounds good
[12:13] <rbasak> I think that theoretically that team controls its own membership (rather than the DMB), but I think an exception might be needed to get it bootstrapped again, unless an existing team member proposes something else.
[12:13] <ddstreet> my understanding is that team is only laney these days?
[12:14] <rbasak> I think so.
[12:14] <rbasak> I propose to drop everyone from that team who hasn't participated in this or previous conversations.
[12:14] <rbasak> s/chat process/that process/
[12:15] <ddstreet> sounds good, i'll (re) read up on the docs and laney feel free to ping or email me
[12:15] <rbasak> Thank you!
[12:15] <ddstreet> slashd is out sick today, but i'm sure he will want to be involved as well
[12:16] <rbasak> I'm assuming here that nobody will have any objection to you (in particular, you), joining the team to resurrect it. I certainly do not.
[12:16] <rbasak> Ditto for slashd
[12:16] <rbasak> I'd object to previously unknown people taking on the job of rebootstrapping it.
[12:16] <rbasak> After it's rebootstrapped, I'd prefer to see the team determine what it wants to do for itself.
[12:19] <Guest3036> Hi! Is this the ubuntu installer channel?
[12:31] <rbasak> laney: can you change the ownership of ~ubuntu-backporters to ~techboard or does ScottK need to do that?
[12:32] <laney> Not me
[12:32] <rbasak> I'll ask Scott - thanks
[14:20] <slyon> xnox: I'd love to get your comment on this, once you find some spare cycles: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1936948
[14:55] <xnox> slyon:  commented
[14:56] <slyon> thank you!
[23:26] <mwhudson> vorlon: thanks for reviewing that casper thing
[23:26] <vorlon> sure thing
[23:26] <mwhudson> vorlon: if you or anyone has any idea for a language to rewrite casper in that won't make me scream all the time i'm all ears