| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: ah, I missed that there was a metview binary; also done now | 01:54 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | ta | 05:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bcmwl [sync] (focal-proposed) [6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3] | 07:46 | |
| laney | juliank: see recent discussions between xnox and me, it needs fixing in pkgstripfiles imho | 08:04 |
| laney | but the only idea I had was to skip the symlinking for MA: same packages | 08:05 |
| juliank | laney: doesn't help much though, if they also disagree about which package to run 'apt-get changelog for' | 08:17 |
| laney | wdym? | 08:17 |
| laney | if no symlink, then it's always the current package | 08:18 |
| juliank | hmm okay | 08:18 |
| laney | anyway x_nox pointed out that would be a bit of a loss in main, there's a lot of MA same stuff there, don't have an answer to that | 08:19 |
| juliank | Isn't it just missing a sort somewhere in pkgstripfiles? | 08:19 |
| juliank | such that it always picks the lowest name or sth rather than random | 08:19 |
| laney | it's a different dependency on i386 vs amd64 | 08:19 |
| laney | (for some reason, didn't look into why) | 08:20 |
| juliank | oh ok | 08:20 |
| juliank | i386 built with roken support, amd64 w/o, odd | 08:20 |
| laney | maybe it would be ok to fix that and pretend we never thought about a more general problem | 08:21 |
| juliank | It links in rk_getprogname@HEIMDAL_ROKEN_1.0 on i386 | 08:22 |
| juliank | uh but why | 08:23 |
| juliank | I see, it statically links in libvers which calls it in print_version() | 08:28 |
| juliank | nah | 08:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (hirsute-proposed) [21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2] | 08:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mesa [source] (focal-proposed) [21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2~20.04.1] | 08:50 | |
| xnox | laney: should we just try a no change rebuild? becuase previous build on amd64 had a dep on roken. | 09:32 |
| xnox | laney: or like for example, disable lto. | 09:32 |
| xnox | as far as i can tell...... rk_getprogname => getprogname with lto | 09:32 |
| juliank | xnox: but where would a getprogname() come from? | 09:35 |
| juliank | I don't see where the call comes from, really | 09:36 |
| laney | I find it a bit weird to be just fixing the case which is exposing a flaw in the pkgstripfiles logic | 09:36 |
| laney | but maybe it's ok | 09:36 |
| xnox | ./lib/roken/roken.h.in:#define getprogname rk_getprogname | 09:36 |
| xnox | with a macro | 09:36 |
| xnox | i bet my wild speculation will turn out wrong, so uploading to bileto | 09:37 |
| juliank | we really ought to setup piuparts and have britney run it | 09:39 |
| juliank | Or just write a check that overlapping files in m-a: same are identical | 09:39 |
| juliank | such that they don't make it out of proposed | 09:39 |
| laney | yeah p-m could do that directly, that would be nice | 09:49 |
| xnox | Searching for duplicated docs in dependency libroken18-heimdal... | 10:00 |
| xnox | symlinking changelog.Debian.gz in libwind0-heimdal to file in libroken18-heimdal | 10:01 |
| xnox | so looks ok. | 10:01 |
| xnox | it feels like heimdal is both under and over linked, and has transitive deps on things that are not use and not made public; and at the same time underlinked to things that are used. | 10:01 |
| xnox | unless it's like all plugins. | 10:01 |
| xnox | i wonder if i could have forced lto on in heimdal on i386 too. | 10:01 |
| juliank | xnox: that log is from amd64? | 10:02 |
| juliank | yes, yes, it is | 10:03 |
| juliank | so odd | 10:03 |
| xnox | https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4627/+packages | 10:04 |
| xnox | sil2100: can you please remove https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu9.1 as verification failed from hirsute-proposed? | 10:51 |
| xnox | it never made it into impish; and is redundant and impcomplete / broken. | 10:52 |
| xnox | we shouldn't forward port 9.1 to impish, cause it will be trumped by new upstream release. Nor back to focal, as it is imcomplete. | 10:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: crust-firmware (impish-proposed/primary) [0.4-1] | 11:49 | |
| sil2100 | xnox: ouch, so this will require a new upstream u-boot version for everything to work properly? | 11:53 |
| sil2100 | I mean, which u-boot version should we essentially get into focal to get unleashed/unmatched boards working properly? | 11:53 |
| sil2100 | Or is what we have in focal-proposed good enough and working? | 11:57 |
| xnox | sil2100: everything is good in focal-proposed | 12:01 |
| xnox | sil2100: it's just hirsute-proposed is borken and redundant. | 12:01 |
| xnox | re: AA tasks | 12:02 |
| xnox | i want that impish NEW crust-firmware sync from debian experimental; and grub2-unsigned in impish unapproved reviewed please =) | 12:02 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 12:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [amd64] (impish-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu46] | 12:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-unsigned [arm64] (impish-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu46] | 12:08 | |
| xnox | sil2100: in other news, i am confused how we are backporting u-boot without backporting newer opensbi for it. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensbi i thought we must build newer u-boot againt newer opensbi to get the fu740 CIP 1200 errata fix | 12:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gcc-or1k-elf (impish-proposed/primary) [1] | 12:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: binutils-or1k-elf (impish-proposed/primary) [1] | 12:15 | |
| juliank | sil2100: I pinged you about shim-signed (1.37~18.04.10) bionic yesterday, you said you were on it, but it's still unapproved? It fixes up 18.04.9 to build on arm64 | 12:33 |
| juliank | (removing efitools build-dep) | 12:34 |
| lucasmoura | hi bdmurray, he have completed our tests for ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.2.1. We can proceed with the SRU process: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1934902 | 13:41 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1934902 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.1 -> 27.2) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 13:41 |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.37~18.04.10] | 14:36 | |
| sil2100 | xnox: I don't have much context re: u-boot, I think jawn-smith and waveform were driving it. Maybe they need to be made aware of that! | 14:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dahdi-linux (focal-security/universe) [1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu6.3 => 1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu6.3] (kernel-dkms) (sync) | 14:38 | |
| blackboxsw | lucasmoura: bdmurray, vorlon actually it seems that the accepted SRU upload into -proposed didn't track the related SRU bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1930741 and 1932028 they are not showing up as required on the pending-sru page | 14:43 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1930741 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) "20apt-esm-hook.conf is missing semicolons at end of option" [Undecided, New] | 14:43 |
| blackboxsw | I think we need verification logs and tags on those two bugs: 1930741 and 1932028 for ua-tools SRU | 14:44 |
| ubottu | Bug 1932028 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) "missing version dependency on distro-info" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1932028 | 14:44 |
| waveform | xnox, yup -- wasn't aware of that specific opensbi requirement; jawn-smith had indicated that simply updating u-boot to the version in -proposed enabled boot on the unmatched, though I recall adding a tweak to d/control to require opensbi >=0.8 as that was the first version to incorporate the necessary firmware bins (i.e. it would fail with opensbi 0.6 from focal's release); is there a plan to SRU opensbi 0.9 for focal? | 14:45 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: the source.changes file only included bug 1934902 https://launchpadlibrarian.net/548803280/ubuntu-advantage-tools_27.2.1~20.04.1_source.changes | 14:47 |
| ubottu | Bug 1934902 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.1 -> 27.2) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1934902 | 14:47 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: The uploader would have wanted to use -v with debbuild | 14:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lime-forensics (focal-security/universe) [1.9-1ubuntu0.3 => 1.9-1ubuntu0.3] (kernel-dkms) (sync) | 14:47 | |
| jawn-smith | interesting, the images are booting reliably in qemu, but I'll look into this errata some more | 14:47 |
| xnox | jawn-smith: erratra is specific to u-boot that is used on unmatched CPU.... qemu does not use u-boot from the image.... | 14:48 |
| xnox | cause qemu uses u-boot-qemu obviously | 14:48 |
| jawn-smith | ah that makes sense. I can work on that SRU if it's deemed necessary then | 14:49 |
| jawn-smith | alright well, does seem important | 15:05 |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: If you could mention the two bugs not showing up in bug 1934902 that'd be helpful to ensure u-a-t doesn't get released prematurely | 15:15 |
| ubottu | Bug 1934902 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.1 -> 27.2) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1934902 | 15:15 |
| xnox | waveform: it was 0.9, with ubuntu revision, because of the erratra fix, not because of shipping .bin files. Those became available earlier indeed. | 15:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lime-forensics (focal-security/universe) [1.9-1ubuntu0.3 => 1.9-1ubuntu0.3] (kernel-dkms) (sync) | 15:21 | |
| blackboxsw | +1 bdmurray thanks we will | 15:34 |
| jawn-smith | this actually might be a good one for xypron | 15:51 |
| vorlon | juliank: should the shim-signed/devel task be closed on LP: #1934506? | 23:27 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1934506 in shim-signed (Ubuntu) "Mirrored MOK variables could be accidentally deleted" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1934506 | 23:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!