[05:43] <mborzecki> morning
[05:49] <_moep_> good morning mborzecki 
[05:50] <mborzecki> _moep_: morning
[06:04] <pstolowski> morning
[06:44] <mborzecki> pstolowski: hey
[06:58] <zyga> good morning
[07:32] <mborzecki> mardy is on vacation right?
[07:42] <mborzecki> meh, i need to run some errands today :/
[08:17] <pstolowski> mborzecki: yeah
[08:38] <mborzecki> re
[08:42] <_moep_> wb
[09:19] <pstolowski> damn, services are complicated
[09:31] <mborzecki> pstolowski: haha damn right :)
[09:32] <mborzecki> zyga: btw. i've updated the bpf program to support matching any minor number in device cgroup (similar to eg. `c 1:*` to allow all char devs with major 1): https://github.com/bboozzoo/snapd/commit/ad3ad5c76cf1535d9554dc88abc1f60377b73539 turned out to be quite easy actually once the verifier was happy
[09:44] <zyga> mborzecki, nice :)
[09:44] <zyga> mborzecki, how close is full v2 support?
[09:45] <mborzecki> zyga: a branch with some refactoring is up
[10:42] <pstolowski> hmm error: cannot refresh "lxd": unexpectedly empty response from the server , it's the 2nd time i see this today on github
[10:53] <mborzecki> errand, back in 1h
[11:23] <ijohnson[m]> morning folks
[11:23] <ijohnson[m]> pstolowski: hey thanks for #10551, so is that PR sufficient to fix the failing spread test I proposed ?
[11:23] <ijohnson[m]> or is that PR a pre-req to be able to fix the failing spread test
[11:24] <pstolowski> ijohnson[m]: hey
[11:26] <pstolowski> ijohnson[m]: i think it needs snapctl side fix, but need to think a bit more. if it passes then it may be by luck
[11:27] <ijohnson[m]> interesting, I would have thought that since snapctl just creates service-control tasks that it would fix it
[11:28] <pstolowski> ijohnson[m]: it gets tricky wrt to explicit services vs disabled services
[11:28] <ijohnson[m]> ah I see
[11:29] <pstolowski> ijohnson[m]: if snapctl passes foo (as opposed to snapname.foo) it won't get onto explicit services list afaiu. but i need to double check, this stuff is tricky
[11:29] <ijohnson[m]> indeed it is tricky
[11:29] <pstolowski> and everything being strings makes it harder
[11:29] <ijohnson[m]> I'll give this PR a review now and then I'll try to review your auto-refresh one today I started a bit yesterday
[11:30] <pstolowski> thanks
[11:30]  * pstolowski lunch
[11:30] <pstolowski> ijohnson[m]: see also my comments under mardy's pr
[11:30] <ijohnson[m]> ack
[11:44] <mborzecki> re
[13:10] <mborzecki> pstolowski: quick thought, maybe we should have separate types for those strings?
[13:11] <pstolowski> mborzecki: yeah, i was moaning about that in the su notes
[13:12] <pstolowski> mborzecki: i think that's not for now, but would be nice when we do further changes wrt to pedronis' plan
[15:13]  * cachio lunch