/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/07/23/#snappy.txt

mborzeckimorning03:58
mborzeckihmmm `Skipping non-snapd systemd unit snap.lxd.workaround.service` in postrm-purge breaks the test, however where does the unit come from?04:31
mborzeckipstolowski: hey06:06
pstolowskihey mborzecki 06:06
mborzeckipstolowski: tests are failing 😕 there's a weird thing in postrm-purge and user session socket is flaky but sergio opened https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10556 for this06:07
pstolowskimborzecki: oh.. the revert of services change landed, related?06:10
mborzeckipstolowski:  would that create snap.lxd.workaround.service file?06:10
pstolowskimborzecki: no06:12
pstolowskimborzecki: google:ubuntu-20.04-64:tests/main/snap-services passed for me06:29
pstolowskior do i need to run both in sequence?06:29
mborzeckipstolowski: nah, i don' think there's anything related to snap services06:29
mvopstolowski: looks like there is one comment for 10551, are you on it or should I add the todo? I'm keen to land this so that I can branch 2.52 :)08:22
pstolowskimvo: the TODO from Samuele? i'll add in a sec08:23
pstolowskimvo: updated08:28
mvopstolowski: ta!08:37
mborzeckimeh, i can't get batch delete from bpf map to work, funny that deleting elements one by one works though09:46
ijohnson[m]morning folks11:30
pstolowskimorning ijohnson[m] 11:30
ijohnson[m]hey pstolowski 11:31
mborzeckiijohnson: hey11:31
ijohnson[m]I am hopeful with slightly less meetings today I can get my review finished for the auto-refresh gating hook thing11:31
ijohnson[m]hey bboozzoo 11:31
ijohnson[m]how has this week been for y'all11:31
mborzeckiijohnson: rather silent, some tests are failing again, the postrm-purge is in particular interesting, as there's a transient systemd unit for which it isn't clear where it comes from11:37
ijohnson[m]bboozzoo: is it one our transiennt units we create to run snap apps/hooks ?11:38
ijohnson[m]I saw an update yesterday to this bug where it was fixed by a systemd patch someone has11:38
mborzeckiijohnson: it's called snap.lxd.workaround.service and it executes /bin/true ;)11:38
mborzeckiijohnson: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/z32jQzcDn6/11:38
ijohnson[m]this one 11:39
ijohnson[m]https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/192880611:39
ijohnson[m]bboozzoo: ah yeah that does look just like the sort of transient scope that is left around in the bug ^11:39
mborzeckiijohnson: but those are clearly scopes, probably from runs of kubectl11:41
ijohnson[m]I assume lxd runs this somehow as well11:41
mborzeckithis one looks like it was added on purpose, with Deletegate=yes and RemainAfterExit11:41
ijohnson[m]oh I missed the `RemainAfterExit=yes` 11:42
ijohnson[m]hmm11:42
pstolowskii'm slightly worried by snap-services test failures, a bit odd it started around landing the changes around this area, but then it doesn't fail everywhere11:43
ijohnson[m]pstolowski: do you have logs for an example failure ? 11:44
pstolowskiijohnson[m]: yes, e.g. https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10551/checks?check_run_id=3142648936 (it was failing on master already, so it's not specific to this PR)11:45
mborzeckihm i think i know the culprit now11:45
pstolowskiijohnson[m]: there is a PR from cachio for this: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/1055611:45
ijohnson[m]ah right that issue11:46
ijohnson[m]yeah I think that's been around for a few weeks11:46
pstolowskiah ok, i didn't see it.. good (sort of)11:47
mborzeckiok, i've updaed my standup notes and i'm wrapping it up for the week, got some driving to do11:55
ijohnson[m]bboozzoo: have a nice weekend, you're back on Tuesday ?11:55
mborzeckiijohnson: thanks, yes back on tue11:56
ijohnson[m]nice, see you then11:56
pstolowskimborzecki: have fun!11:57
=== dob1_ is now known as dob1
* cachio_ afk17:51
=== zyga__ is now known as zyg
=== zyg is now known as zyga
=== clobrano1 is now known as clobrano

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!