[03:58] <mborzecki> morning
[04:31] <mborzecki> hmmm `Skipping non-snapd systemd unit snap.lxd.workaround.service` in postrm-purge breaks the test, however where does the unit come from?
[06:06] <mborzecki> pstolowski: hey
[06:06] <pstolowski> hey mborzecki 
[06:07] <mborzecki> pstolowski: tests are failing 😕 there's a weird thing in postrm-purge and user session socket is flaky but sergio opened https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10556 for this
[06:10] <pstolowski> mborzecki: oh.. the revert of services change landed, related?
[06:10] <mborzecki> pstolowski:  would that create snap.lxd.workaround.service file?
[06:12] <pstolowski> mborzecki: no
[06:29] <pstolowski> mborzecki: google:ubuntu-20.04-64:tests/main/snap-services passed for me
[06:29] <pstolowski> or do i need to run both in sequence?
[06:29] <mborzecki> pstolowski: nah, i don' think there's anything related to snap services
[08:22] <mvo> pstolowski: looks like there is one comment for 10551, are you on it or should I add the todo? I'm keen to land this so that I can branch 2.52 :)
[08:23] <pstolowski> mvo: the TODO from Samuele? i'll add in a sec
[08:28] <pstolowski> mvo: updated
[08:37] <mvo> pstolowski: ta!
[09:46] <mborzecki> meh, i can't get batch delete from bpf map to work, funny that deleting elements one by one works though
[11:30] <ijohnson[m]> morning folks
[11:30] <pstolowski> morning ijohnson[m] 
[11:31] <ijohnson[m]> hey pstolowski 
[11:31] <mborzecki> ijohnson: hey
[11:31] <ijohnson[m]> I am hopeful with slightly less meetings today I can get my review finished for the auto-refresh gating hook thing
[11:31] <ijohnson[m]> hey bboozzoo 
[11:31] <ijohnson[m]> how has this week been for y'all
[11:37] <mborzecki> ijohnson: rather silent, some tests are failing again, the postrm-purge is in particular interesting, as there's a transient systemd unit for which it isn't clear where it comes from
[11:38] <ijohnson[m]> bboozzoo: is it one our transiennt units we create to run snap apps/hooks ?
[11:38] <ijohnson[m]> I saw an update yesterday to this bug where it was fixed by a systemd patch someone has
[11:38] <mborzecki> ijohnson: it's called snap.lxd.workaround.service and it executes /bin/true ;)
[11:38] <mborzecki> ijohnson: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/z32jQzcDn6/
[11:39] <ijohnson[m]> this one 
[11:39] <ijohnson[m]> https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1928806
[11:39] <ijohnson[m]> bboozzoo: ah yeah that does look just like the sort of transient scope that is left around in the bug ^
[11:41] <mborzecki> ijohnson: but those are clearly scopes, probably from runs of kubectl
[11:41] <ijohnson[m]> I assume lxd runs this somehow as well
[11:41] <mborzecki> this one looks like it was added on purpose, with Deletegate=yes and RemainAfterExit
[11:42] <ijohnson[m]> oh I missed the `RemainAfterExit=yes` 
[11:42] <ijohnson[m]> hmm
[11:43] <pstolowski> i'm slightly worried by snap-services test failures, a bit odd it started around landing the changes around this area, but then it doesn't fail everywhere
[11:44] <ijohnson[m]> pstolowski: do you have logs for an example failure ? 
[11:45] <pstolowski> ijohnson[m]: yes, e.g. https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10551/checks?check_run_id=3142648936 (it was failing on master already, so it's not specific to this PR)
[11:45] <mborzecki> hm i think i know the culprit now
[11:45] <pstolowski> ijohnson[m]: there is a PR from cachio for this: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10556
[11:46] <ijohnson[m]> ah right that issue
[11:46] <ijohnson[m]> yeah I think that's been around for a few weeks
[11:47] <pstolowski> ah ok, i didn't see it.. good (sort of)
[11:55] <mborzecki> ok, i've updaed my standup notes and i'm wrapping it up for the week, got some driving to do
[11:55] <ijohnson[m]> bboozzoo: have a nice weekend, you're back on Tuesday ?
[11:56] <mborzecki> ijohnson: thanks, yes back on tue
[11:56] <ijohnson[m]> nice, see you then
[11:57] <pstolowski> mborzecki: have fun!
[17:51]  * cachio_ afk