| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.27.1ubuntu4 => 1.27.1ubuntu5] (core) | 07:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-or1k-elf [amd64] (impish-proposed) [1] | 07:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-or1k-elf [armhf] (impish-proposed) [1] | 07:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-or1k-elf [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [1] | 07:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-or1k-elf [arm64] (impish-proposed) [1] | 07:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-or1k-elf [s390x] (impish-proposed) [1] | 07:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted binutils-or1k-elf [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [1] | 07:52 | |
| juliank | sil2100: ^^ a fixed up fwupd-signed in focal | 07:53 |
|---|---|---|
| juliank | sil2100: I forgot to change the build-depends last time :/ | 07:53 |
| sil2100 | o/ | 07:54 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, saw the ping from ycheng | 07:54 |
| sil2100 | Looking now | 07:54 |
| schopin | xnox: I guess I did that (couldn't build the package without the patches anyway). Thanks for the explanation! | 07:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd-signed [source] (focal-proposed) [1.27.1ubuntu5] | 08:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [amd64] (impish-proposed) [0.13.0-1] | 09:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [armhf] (impish-proposed) [0.13.0-1] | 09:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [riscv64] (impish-proposed) [0.13.0-1] | 09:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [arm64] (impish-proposed) [0.13.0-1] | 09:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [s390x] (impish-proposed) [0.13.0-1] | 09:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wlroots [ppc64el] (impish-proposed) [0.13.0-1] | 09:14 | |
| sil2100 | slyon: hey! Accepted the new binaries ^ But yeah, I see libwlroots7 had some reverse-depends, so yeah, those might need rebuilding/handling | 09:15 |
| slyon | sil2100: thanks! Yes, I triggered a sync for the sway reverse-dependency that resolves this. There is a new phoc upstream release in Debian/experimental as well, I need to look into that too | 09:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-or1k-elf [amd64] (impish-proposed/universe) [1] (no packageset) | 09:36 | |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 09:46 |
| sil2100 | huh, a lot of image build failures I see | 09:49 |
| sil2100 | Most of the livefs builds failed with no logs though | 09:49 |
| xnox | something must have happened, as the gcc-or1k-elf builds also all failed without logs. restarted them now. | 10:22 |
| laney | eek | 10:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.13-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 15.2.13-0ubuntu0.20.04.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 10:27 | |
| mwhudson | sil2100: i asked in #launchpad and got this | 10:31 |
| mwhudson | <tomwardill> mwhudson: we had a network outage this morning, can you retry them and see what happens? | 10:31 |
| mwhudson | sil2100: so it might be worth trying again? | 10:31 |
| laney | I'm trying ubuntu desktop again | 10:38 |
| laney | see if that works | 10:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-or1k-elf [riscv64] (impish-proposed/universe) [1] (no packageset) | 11:06 | |
| laney | arm64 failed again | 11:19 |
| * laney has asked LP | 11:22 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | juliank, cjwatson I tried to build virtualbox locally | 11:54 |
| LocutusOfBorg | with DH_VERBOSE=1 | 11:54 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and r^3:no | 11:54 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I did "fakeroot debian/rules clean build install binary" | 11:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and I can confirm the bug if I run from unprivileged user, and no bug if I run as root | 11:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (in a chroot) | 11:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | fakeroot chmod -s debian/virtualbox/usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxSDL | 11:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this fails | 11:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and this doesn't chmod -s debian/virtualbox/usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxSDL | 11:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | forget the last sentence, I was doing -s instead of +s | 11:58 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: Rules-Requires-Root: binary-targets i've not seen such stanza before. | 12:32 |
| xnox | i've see no-stanza, and Rules-Requires-Root: no. | 12:32 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: i wonder if Rules-Require-Root: binary-targets is not well supported. | 12:33 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: i wonder if it worth a try to drop that line altogether, and build again. | 12:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, it stopped working when I added Rules-Requires-Root: no | 12:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | if I removed, or I add binary-target it works again | 12:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vbox is already busted in impish and hirsute-proposed | 12:39 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: one cannot use RRR:no with chmod +s.... it is contradictory. | 12:46 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: why did you add RRR:no? | 12:46 |
| * xnox expects virtualbox to build _without_ RRR stanza in control. | 12:47 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, it works also with RRR: binary-targets | 12:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | The builder may set DEB_RULES_REQUIRES_ROOT environment variable when calling any of the mandatory targets as defined in Rules-Requires-Root. If the variable is not set, the package must behave as if it was set to binary-targets. | 12:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and that variable is documented | 12:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | my issue is: why R^3: no works on Debian but not in Ubuntu? | 12:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | how many packages (wrongly) added R^3: no and then failed to run in Ubuntu? | 12:52 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: builders can choose to ignore RRR:no.... so i guess the question is if debian builders are honoring it, and are not missbuilt there too. | 12:56 |
| xnox | one is supposed to test packages before building them with RRR:no | 12:56 |
| xnox | some also try to do chmod +s in maintainer scripts, rather than packaging it. | 12:56 |
| xnox | also not sure if i care about package that incorrectly uses RRR:no and gets missbuilt to still be working. | 13:00 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: i am confused about your assertion that in Debian in works. In debian i see correct permissions and RRR:binary-targets. | 13:05 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: i don't see "correct permissions and RRR:no" | 13:05 |
| xnox | was that in some previous upload? | 13:05 |
| xnox | ah i see you did that in -4 | 13:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | <xnox> one is supposed to test packages before building them with RRR:no. | 13:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, you test on Debian, everything works, you upload, the package is broken in Ubuntu | 13:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | or even, you build with pbuilder, you test, you upload, its broken | 13:08 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: i am perplexed how did -3 build with correct permissions in debian. | 13:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | <xnox> LocutusOfBorg: i am perplexed how did -3 build with correct permissions in debian. | 13:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | that is the main point | 13:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the mismatch between Debian and Ubuntu behaviour | 13:09 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: either builder is ignoring RRR:no; or there is a buggy kernel; or there are some brand new fixes somehwere in debian that allow doing chmod +s; then chown root; and keep the +s ..... which is quite a violation of priviledge escalation..... | 13:09 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: there are lots of differences between debian & ubuntu. in sbuild, dpkg, toolchain, kernel behaviour. | 13:09 |
| xnox | so i'm not surprised that are discrepancies. | 13:09 |
| xnox | it would be nice to get them explained. | 13:10 |
| lucasmoura | Hi sil2100 we have already performed the verification for ubuntu-advantage-tools and the new package is sitting in proposed for more than a week now | 13:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but if Debian is "ignore R^3", how are people supposed to check/test it? | 13:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | looks more an experimental feature | 13:10 |
| lucasmoura | I think we can upload it to updates | 13:10 |
| lucasmoura | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1934902 | 13:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1934902 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.1 -> 27.2) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 13:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I already set to binary-target and looks working, so meh | 13:10 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg: normally one tests with local build by hand. aka dpkg-buildpackage -b => as non-root user; instead of like -rfakeroot or some such. | 13:13 |
| xnox | as per documentation RRR:no means may invoke any target with an unprivileged user. | 13:13 |
| xnox | => meaning some builders can choose to ignore that. | 13:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nobody ever told anywhere to not use pbuilder to build something, specially w.r.t. R^3 | 13:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | anyway, probably just virtualbox is broken | 13:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so meh | 13:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I might even change to do chmod in postinst | 13:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (focal-updates/main) [1.40.6 => 1.40.6] (core) (sync) | 14:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (focal-updates/main) [15.4-0ubuntu7 => 15.4-0ubuntu7] (core) (sync) | 14:01 | |
| bdmurray | vorlon: where are we at with the NBS removal for Groovy? | 14:06 |
| sil2100 | lucasmoura: hey! Will look at releasing it later today! | 14:19 |
| lucasmoura | Thanks sil2100 | 14:20 |
| sil2100 | xnox: hey, did you chat with William about why they didn't backport the new opensbi for the u-boot backport? | 14:21 |
| sil2100 | Would like to know if that's still needed for .3 | 14:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireless-regdb (bionic-proposed/main) [2020.11.20-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 2021.07.14-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core) (sync) | 14:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireless-regdb (focal-proposed/main) [2020.11.20-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 2021.07.14-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (core) (sync) | 14:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireless-regdb (hirsute-proposed/main) [2020.11.20-0ubuntu1 => 2021.07.14-0ubuntu1~21.04.1] (core) (sync) | 14:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-or1k-elf [s390x] (impish-proposed/universe) [1] (no packageset) | 14:43 | |
| xnox | sil2100: i did, he said him and/or xypron will be preparing it. | 14:57 |
| xnox | sil2100: i believe that yes we do need it for .3 | 14:57 |
| xnox | u-boot-sifive postinst + opensbi | 14:57 |
| xnox | i could make it too, but don't want to duplicate work if it already started by jawn-smith & xypron | 14:58 |
| jawn-smith | That's correct, xypron and I have started on that, and the plan is for xypron to be the main force behind that | 15:00 |
| sil2100 | didrocks999: helloooooooo! I have a request: could you reupload ubiquity with the new shim refreshed? | 15:02 |
| sil2100 | didrocks999: for focal that is | 15:02 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 15:02 |
| didrocks999 | sil2100: hey! I just need to basically dget 20.04.15.14 and reupload it, or is there anything else needed? | 15:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-or1k-elf [arm64] (impish-proposed/universe) [1] (no packageset) | 15:04 | |
| vorlon | bdmurray: NBS removal has finished | 15:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-or1k-elf [armhf] (impish-proposed/universe) [1] (no packageset) | 15:09 | |
| jawn-smith | xnox: is there anything else besides the loader1/loader2 issue missing from u-boot for 20.04.3? Someone mentioned it may have a problem | 15:10 |
| sil2100 | didrocks999: yeah, just refreshing the in-source deps is enough :) | 15:10 |
| xnox | jawn-smith: 1) add postinst 2) make that build of u-boot be built against the new opensbi. I.e. u-boot sru must have build-depends: opensbi => (the sru version of opensbi with errata fix) | 15:11 |
| didrocks999 | sil2100: shouldn’t you accept the shim packages first (they are still in unapproved)? | 15:11 |
| didrocks999 | or it’s independent and will be pick up when refreshing the in-source deps? | 15:12 |
| jawn-smith | right those are the two things that xypron has included in his latest ppa build that just needs sponsorship | 15:12 |
| didrocks999 | ack, seems it’s picking 1.40.6 | 15:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.14 => 20.04.15.16] (core) | 15:18 | |
| didrocks999 | sil2100: done ^ | 15:18 |
| sil2100 | \o/ | 15:20 |
| sil2100 | REVIEWING! | 15:20 |
| sil2100 | didrocks999: yeah, it pick up stuff from -proposed, no problem | 15:22 |
| Eickmeyer | ubuntu-archive: Does anybody have a cycle or two to review plasma-optimus? It's a neat little plasmoid I forked for KDE Plasma. :) | 15:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.15] | 15:27 | |
| sil2100 | didrocks999: eeek, sorry to poke you again, the SRU is all good and all, but since I hope you have the branch still on your PC and such - there's a debian/.changelog.swp in the diff | 15:33 |
| sil2100 | didrocks999: could you just re-upload with that removed? If you're busy I guess I could also tweak it though | 15:33 |
| didrocks999 | sil2100: argh, I thought debuild was skipping them, weird, anyway, let me rebuild the source package and upload | 15:34 |
| jawn-smith | sil2100: do we ever plan to SRU the golang ubuntu-image to focal? | 15:34 |
| sil2100 | didrocks999: thanks, this will be an insta-accept then o/ | 15:34 |
| sil2100 | jawn-smith: I would say yes! So the python ubuntu-image we actually supported on every supported release, and I think we'd still want to do something similar, especially for LTS users | 15:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (focal-proposed/main) [20.04.15.14 => 20.04.15.16] (core) | 15:36 | |
| didrocks999 | sil2100: \o/ this one should be good ^ sorry for this | 15:36 |
| sil2100 | If, let's say, we see there's some issue in supporting it in bionic, so LTS-1, then I'd say let's at least let's support it in focal | 15:37 |
| sil2100 | didrocks999: thank you! | 15:37 |
| didrocks999 | yw :) | 15:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.16] | 15:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.15.16] | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed debian-installer from i386-whitelist in impish | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added eglexternalplatform to i386-whitelist in impish | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added gtk4 to i386-whitelist in impish | 15:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-470-server to i386-whitelist in impish | 15:44 | |
| xnox | bdmurray: can i please request early sru-release of bug #1932173 , bug #1932169 , bug #1932160 , bug #1932159 ? these are verified, no adt regressions, but we need them out to flip hwe kernels from v5.8 to v5.11 | 15:53 |
| ubottu | Bug 1932173 in linux-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu Focal) "xtables-addons/3.9-1ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1932173 | 15:53 |
| ubottu | Bug 1932169 in rtl8812au (Ubuntu Focal) "rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1" [Critical, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1932169 | 15:53 |
| ubottu | Bug 1932160 in broadcom-sta (Ubuntu Focal) "broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-12 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1" [Critical, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1932160 | 15:53 |
| ubottu | Bug 1932159 in bcmwl (Ubuntu Focal) "bcmwl/6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1" [Critical, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1932159 | 15:53 |
| bdmurray | xnox: You can always request things. | 15:54 |
| bdmurray | Seriously though I'll look at those today. | 15:55 |
| xnox | bdmurray: =))))))) | 15:56 |
| xnox | bdmurray: i feel like at this point my karma quota of that "one standard bottle of white wine" as declared on the customs forms is running out though. | 15:56 |
| sil2100 | I'll be still doing a sweep through -proposed packages to release, so let me ping you bdmurray when I'm done with that | 15:57 |
| sil2100 | Since I don't know if I'll manage to go through all of them | 15:57 |
| xnox | bdmurray: sil2100: from kernel team, we will need two more sru-accept; verify; sru-release. | 15:57 |
| xnox | added targets for 20.04.3 & set importance to critical https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-20.04.3 as without them, we are not going to get hwe changed from v5.8 to v5.11 it will regress peoples wifi => those people will not be happy about wifi-less kernel upgrades. | 15:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added pipewire to i386-whitelist in impish | 15:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added weston to i386-whitelist in impish | 15:59 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: why don't you review my livecd-rootfs MP and I'll do the SRU stuff | 16:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evdi (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-1ubuntu3~20.04.1 => 1.9.1-1ubuntu4~20.04.1] (kernel-dkms) (sync) | 16:04 | |
| xnox | bdmurray: in terms of sru-accepts kernel team really wants the evdi above https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=evdi | 16:05 |
| bdmurray | xnox: I've heard that | 16:05 |
| xnox | and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=lttng-modules | 16:05 |
| xnox | bdmurray: yeah, i bet you have. sorry. We just came out of sync meeting. and let's just say, nobody was happy that we can't flip to v5.11 already. | 16:06 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: I already did that! | 16:07 |
| sil2100 | Anyway, I'm doing a sweep of proposed now, will do some queue reviews tomorrow | 16:07 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: I'm out tomorrow so will do some of my SRU work today | 16:08 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: oh, ok, so maybe let's switch in that case, I'll do part of my shift tomorrow then - I only managed to release ubuntu-advantage-tools into -updates if anything | 16:11 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: that sounds like a solid plan to me | 16:11 |
| sil2100 | I'll also look into the release of shim in a bit, if not I'll do that tomorrow - so leave those to me for now | 16:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-or1k-elf [ppc64el] (impish-proposed/universe) [1] (no packageset) | 16:13 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: will do | 16:13 |
| sil2100 | Since it's a mess with the fwupd entangled | 16:13 |
| bdmurray | or not do in this case | 16:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libopenaptx to i386-whitelist in impish | 16:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: cockpit-machines (impish-proposed/primary) [243-1] | 16:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cockpit-machines [sync] (impish-proposed) [243-1] | 16:43 | |
| bdmurray | vorlon: Given the NBS removal has finished AIUI I can mark Groovy as obsolete. Is that correct? | 16:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cockpit-machines [amd64] (impish-proposed/none) [243-1] (no packageset) | 16:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cockpit-machines [amd64] (impish-proposed) [243-1] | 16:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xtables-addons (focal-security/universe) [3.9-1ubuntu0.2~20.04.3 => 3.9-1ubuntu0.2~20.04.3] (kernel-dkms) (sync) | 16:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libldac to i386-whitelist in impish | 16:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: broadcom-sta (focal-security/multiverse) [6.30.223.271-12ubuntu0.1 => 6.30.223.271-12ubuntu0.1] (kernel-dkms) (sync) | 17:02 | |
| vorlon | bdmurray: I believe so yes | 17:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8812au (focal-security/universe) [4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.3 => 4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.3] (kernel-dkms) (sync) | 17:04 | |
| bdmurray | vorlon: okay, let's find out | 17:04 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: also there should be 4 packages for the security pocket in the Focal unapproved queue - bcmwl will be the 4th | 17:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bcmwl (focal-security/restricted) [6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3 => 6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3] (kernel-dkms, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 17:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 7772 entries have been added or removed | 17:29 | |
| krytarik | xnox: You can simply separate multiple bug numbers by commas or "and" btw (other languages too) for the bot to parse them properly. | 17:37 |
| krytarik | Also, for anybody who is used to write "LP: #num", you don't need the colon here either. | 17:38 |
| bdmurray | krytarik: but you need LP: # for terminator! | 17:39 |
| krytarik | I'll be baaack! | 17:40 |
| krytarik | Fwiw, the '#' is entirely optional either. | 17:42 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: state of the art on checking syncs to -security is still to manually review the build log? | 17:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xtables-addons [sync] (focal-security) [3.9-1ubuntu0.2~20.04.3] | 17:50 | |
| bdmurray | vorlon: yes, although now that the PPA has been deleted... | 17:52 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: build logs seem to still be there | 17:52 |
| bdmurray | ack I found it | 17:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted broadcom-sta [sync] (focal-security) [6.30.223.271-12ubuntu0.1] | 17:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rtl8812au [sync] (focal-security) [4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.3] | 17:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bcmwl [sync] (focal-security) [6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.3] | 17:57 | |
| bdmurray | xnox: If you want to earn more good will you could tell me if bug 1914075 is fixed. | 19:09 |
| ubottu | Bug 1914075 in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "subiquity 20.04.2 fails to install hwe kernel offline" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1914075 | 19:09 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: bcmwl and rtl8812au still could use accepting for focal-security | 19:10 |
| bdmurray | Oh maybe I hadn't refreshed | 19:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-oslo.limit (impish-proposed/primary) [1.4.0-0ubuntu1] | 19:32 | |
| bdmurray | xnox: Is there reason why evdi and lttng-modules are in the same PPA? I ask because sru-review will get the diff from the PPA description but bileto only adds the diff for one package so its only easy to review lttng-modules which is a big SAD. | 19:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:21.04.14 => 1:21.04.16] (core) | 20:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:21.04.15] | 20:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evdi [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [1.9.1-1ubuntu4~21.04.1] | 21:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evdi [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-1ubuntu4~20.04.1] | 21:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (focal-proposed/universe) [2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.1] (kernel-dkms) | 21:55 | |
| jawn-smith | There are automatic daily tests of Unleashed images running in Testflinger or something similar, correct? | 22:24 |
| vorlon | xnox, plars__: ^^ is this the case? cdimage.production doesn't show riscv in current-triggers, so we at least don't block image promotion on any tests | 22:25 |
| sarnold | "unleashed"? this book from 1996? :) https://books.google.com/books/about/Linux_Unleashed.html?id=IZ5kQgAACAAJ | 22:25 |
| vorlon | sarnold: aaaaahhhh | 22:25 |
| vorlon | "Readers will turn to this second edition for even more in-depth coverage of hot Linux topics -- PPP's" aaaaaaahhhhhhh | 22:26 |
| jawn-smith | If nothing is automatic, is there documentation someone can point me to for how I would test the daily images on the Unleashed? | 22:27 |
| vorlon | I'll stick with trumpet winsock thank you very much | 22:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lttng-modules [source] (focal-proposed) [2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.1] | 22:59 | |
| bdmurray | blackboxsw: It seems like bug 1920836 is verified in that you are fine w/ its current state. Do you know anything about it being slow to launch though? | 23:30 |
| ubottu | Bug 1920836 in software-properties (Ubuntu Xenial) "Show Extended Security Maintenence status" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1920836 | 23:30 |
| jawn-smith | okay bdmurray: u-boot for focal has been SRU verified | 23:36 |
| bdmurray | jawn-smith: cool | 23:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lttng-modules (focal-proposed/universe) [2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 => 2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.1] (kernel-dkms) (sync) | 23:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lttng-modules [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.12.5-1ubuntu1~20.04.2] | 23:53 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!