/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/08/02/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (hirsute-proposed/main) [1:7.1.4-0ubuntu0.21.04.1 => 1:7.1.5-0ubuntu0.21.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)06:02
apwvorlon, for weeks?  that seems rather unexpected given we had a crd in there.06:59
apwvorlon, that is a very old version, -22 too, is this old kernel handling interacting badly with the nvidia upgrade process?07:01
apwvorlon, won't this in fact always happen, you have -N with an old nvidia ABI and upgrade to -M with a new nvidia ABI, won't it always trigger this need for removal and therefore the paritial upgrade warning?07:05
apw(with things as designed)07:05
apwthe dependencies as formed are designed to trigger an attempt to remove like linux-modules-nvidia-460-generic meta package if it cannot upgrade nvidia too; and you are protected by the partial upgrade warning.  but it also triggers a removal of your older kernels nvidia packages (you keep the kernel but not nvidia packages associated with them) which also triggers the partial upgrade protections.07:07
apwi suspect that while horribly inacurate once changed that making the linkage as >= rather than = would make it work the way we want.07:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zhmcclient (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.27.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.31.0-0ubuntu3~21.04.1] (no packageset)08:28
ricotzsil2100, hello :), when time permits please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/193693010:39
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1936930 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Hirsute) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.1.5 for hirsute" [High, In Progress]10:39
sil2100ricotz: sure o/12:45
ricotzsil2100, thank you :)13:12
=== sforshee_ is now known as sforshee
klebersbdmurray, hi! regarding evdi dkms (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evdi/+bug/1932163), I've talked to cascardo and he's reworded the regression potential a bit and we came to the conclusion that without hardware we can't really test it properly13:29
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1932163 in evdi (Ubuntu Focal) "evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1" [Critical, Fix Committed]13:29
schopinCould somebody re-run the autopkgtest for python in the focal openssl SRU? (I don't have permissions). The failing tests are timeouts on the main testsuites.13:39
tumbleweedschopin: retrying python3.9 for amd64 and armhf13:44
schopinthanks :)13:44
sil2100klebers, bdmurray: ok, so I'll consider this resolved then and look into getting it released today o/13:56
kleberssil2100, awesome, thank you! :)13:56
sil2100tjaalton: hey! Do you think the X .3 SRUs are verified and ready to go to -updates?13:57
sil2100I guess the sooner we get those verified and included, the more time we have to fight any potential regressions13:57
tjaaltonsil2100: yes, the mesa regression fix was tested to be good, so I think it's all ready now14:00
tjaaltonat least I haven't heard of anything else that might block it14:00
tjaaltonlet me go through them one last time today14:00
tjaaltonand mark verified what isn't yet14:01
sil2100tjaalton: thank you! But that's great news14:01
sil2100Note to all interested: I'll be releasing shim for both focal and bionic today, so be prepared for any strangeness related to that in the nearest days14:01
sil2100Also, this *will* cause focal daily installer media be unbootable on certain devices, this is something that will have to be fixed before we start working on the candidates14:02
sil2100Oh, xenial too, since I see we still have that to be released14:03
sil2100juliank: ^ JFYI14:03
sil2100bdmurray: hey! Did you have a moment to take a look at the u-boot follow up SRU from me?14:21
sil2100For focal?14:21
bdmurraysil2100: I'm trying to remember that was like 2 days ago14:24
bdmurraysil2100: apparently not but I could do it now14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-octillery-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]14:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-warcraft-intel-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]14:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aelfwine-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]14:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-squirtle-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]14:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-sutton.newell-aekerley-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]14:27
sil2100bdmurray: thanks o/14:28
bdmurraysil2100: where are we with livecd-rootfs for Focal?14:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencryptoki (hirsute-proposed/universe) [3.15.1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 => 3.15.1+dfsg-0ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)14:48
sil2100bdmurray: as mentioned in the release sync-up, still debugging that - it's weird and I have no idea why it's busted15:07
sil2100But I'm digging15:07
bdmurraygot it15:07
sil2100I don't understand why my current attempts are not working but then again I might figured out why the original code was troublesome - I'm testing some new solutions now15:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.197.2 => 1.197.3] (core, kernel)15:40
bdmurraysil2100: the u-boot change in the new focal upload isn't in impish‽15:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (focal-proposed/main) [1.187.15 => 1.187.16] (core, kernel)15:57
bdmurraysil2100: Well, I'll just upload the change for impish.16:09
tjaaltonsil2100: hwe stack all verified now16:36
sil2100bdmurray: wha? Why?18:31
sil2100bdmurray: it's invalid on impish!18:31
sil2100bdmurray: we need to drop it from impish-proposed - the target names are correct with the u-boot version in impish18:31
sil2100bdmurray: the issue was that the postinst change was backported from impish using the impish u-boot target names, while focal has an older u-boot version18:32
sil2100Let me drop the package18:32
sil2100eh, but the version number is burned, so we need to remember that when we go live with the next upload18:34
sil2100But that's fine18:34
sil2100tjaalton: thanks o/18:36
sil2100ricotz: hey! So was there a consensus among the desktop team to build libreoffice with noopt for armhf in the end?18:39
sil2100I of course leave the decision to the team managing here, especially that we currently have no active armhf-based desktop images/products that could potentially be consuming libreoffice18:39
bdmurraysil2100: okay, well that wasn't clear from the history in the bug reports18:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (focal-proposed) [2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04.3]18:55
ricotzsil2100, hey, yes, it is the better approach and seb128 agreed after he had performance concerns19:14
sil2100ricotz: ok, thanks19:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1:7.1.5-0ubuntu0.21.04.1]19:41
sil2100bdmurray: yeah, we only discussed it here on IRC and on syncs19:46
sil2100bdmurray, juliank: ok, I released shim and shim-signed for focal now, will release bionic and xenial tomorrow - please keep an eye out for reports from people19:47
sil2100And yell in case a revert is needed19:47
julianksil2100: Should we skip bionic, it didn't get a fwupd with SBAT yet19:47
juliankWell there's been one in unapproved queue since March19:48
juliankMaybe it is incomplete, I don't remember19:48
juliankfocal should be plenty already19:48
juliank(and xenial too, I suppose, no problems there as we don't build new isntaller images anyway)19:49
juliank(just cloud images, and while they boot via removable media path, they do so via fallback which (should) strip the wrong bootloader path if we parse one)19:49
sil2100juliank: ah, indeed, +1 on skipping bionic for now19:59
sil2100We'll have to get to it sooner or later though, but not a priority for now20:00
sil2100I'll do xenial tomorrow though20:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [sync] (focal-updates) [1.40.6]20:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim [sync] (focal-updates) [15.4-0ubuntu7]20:04
juliankqueuebot broken20:06
juliankor duplicate tarballs?20:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-ucm-conf [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1.2.4-2ubuntu1.2]20:07
sil2100Duplicate20:07
sil2100Those were the synces you performed to Updates some weeks ago!20:07
sil2100Since I released shims using sru-release as usual, forgot that you did syncs previously20:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.24 => 2.664.26] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)20:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.664.26]20:16
sil2100bdmurray: hey! I temporarily reverted my change from livecd-rootfs to not block other work while I try to wrap my head around what's happening20:16
sil2100I pushed a new version to the queue for focal (and released for impish too)20:17
sil2100And now I might go a bit EOD o/20:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.664.24 => 2.664.26] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)20:17
bdmurraysil2100: ack, thanks20:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magnumclient (focal-proposed/main) [2.11.0-0ubuntu4 => 2.11.0-0ubuntu5] (openstack, ubuntu-server)20:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-magnumclient (focal-proposed/main) [2.11.0-0ubuntu4 => 2.11.0-0ubuntu5] (openstack, ubuntu-server)21:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-maps (focal-proposed/universe) [3.36.1-1 => 3.36.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntugnome)21:38

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!