[06:10] <lordievader> Good morning
[09:22] <webchat68> hi folks - is it possible to create an iso from a running instance of ubuntu?
[09:28] <lordievader> IIRC I once replaced the squashfs of the iso with one I had modified. I suppose taking a running install and putting that in the squashfs would work the same. However, I'm not sure if there are some special steps that you need to take. I wouldn't really be surprised if there are tools who do this for you.
[10:04] <TJ-> anyone familiar with 'heartbeat' and having it use IPv6 - docs are silent !
[14:51] <Psi-Jack> heh, I installed Ubuntu Server 20.04 onto a miniPC that had dual NIC's. Once it finished installing I was struck with a nice little "Waiting for Network" job that literally had an unlimited timer on it. What brain dead Ubuntu developer thought this was a good idea by default? LOL
[14:51] <Psi-Jack> I literally had to bypass it by plugging the cable up to the other port, for a moment then back to get actual network connectivity again.
[14:57] <mybalzitch> ikr
[15:02] <TJ-> Psi-Jack: that is systemd-networkd: man systemd-networkd-wait-online.service
[15:02] <Psi-Jack> heh, yeah, but, by default, this is an Ubuntu Server install issue!
[15:02] <Psi-Jack> I mean. most ... servers... have multiple NIC's in them. LOL
[15:03] <TJ-> so don't configure them all! Presumably this was caused by netplan config ?
[15:03] <Psi-Jack> I didn't.... I configured a single port, and post-install, it waited for the unconfigured port till the end of time.
[15:03] <Psi-Jack> OOTB!
[15:04] <Psi-Jack> And this can be repeated in a VM with multiple vNICs, the same result.
[15:04] <Psi-Jack> Just have one vNIC "disconnected"
[15:30] <patdk-lap> same here, happens on every install
[15:30] <patdk-lap> I'm too lazy to configure more than one nic in the installer, mostly cause the installer doesn't handle my usecases
[17:07] <tuxick> the systemd circus/clowns should handle that properly
[19:02] <rbasak> mwhudson: ^
[21:25] <pcfreak30> Hello, I seem to have an issue im getting stumped on. I have a raid array mounted to a /mnt/data/3G/. I am using NFS to export /mnt/data to a client node. THe client writes files to this folder, and i have verified by umounting it, BUT the files do NOT show up on the host. I would appreciate any help. thanks.
[21:26] <pcfreak30> The client writes to /mnt/data/3G/ to be clear
[21:27] <sarnold> pcfreak30: nfs filesystems crossing actual mount points is quite often trouble
[21:27] <sarnold> pcfreak30: it'd be better to export /mnt/data/3G/ and mount that, instead, and see if it works better
[21:28] <pcfreak30> i was trying to reduce the number of mounts needed and just have a sort of super share
[21:29] <sarnold> yeah, that makes sense, I just don't think it works very well
[21:29] <pcfreak30> well i did that
[21:30] <pcfreak30> umounted to verify
[21:30] <pcfreak30> the files exist, but are missing on the host nas server
[21:30] <pcfreak30> but they show up for the client
[21:31] <pcfreak30> the files show up on a second client as well
[21:31] <pcfreak30> when mounted
[21:32] <pcfreak30> the array shows 1% usage but is empty
[21:33] <pcfreak30> So the question is WTF is going on with ghost files on the host?
[21:33] <pcfreak30> FS ix XFS
[21:36] <pcfreak30> sarnold: any ideas on that?
[21:38] <sarnold> pcfreak30: my best guess is that they're written 'under' a mount point..
[21:38] <pcfreak30> i also remonted the host to a second folder and its still empty?
[21:38] <pcfreak30> under? huh?
[21:39] <pcfreak30> the array shows storage usage, which is good but the files cant be found
[21:39] <pcfreak30> unless your a nfs client
[21:40] <pcfreak30> sarnold: ^
[21:40] <sarnold> pcfreak30: this describes what I'm thinking about https://limbenjamin.com/articles/hiding-files-with-mount.html
[21:43] <pcfreak30> ok something like that seemed to hapopen
[21:43] <pcfreak30> how do I aviod that with nfs
[21:45] <pcfreak30> sarnold: