| === iOllieN_ is now known as iOllieN | ||
| teward | cjwatson: do you need a blog post to supplement the May 20, 2020 one about bugs and DMARC complianc,e but for the code review bits? | 12:35 |
|---|---|---|
| teward | or is that just going to be considered "Done, no need to announce it" | 12:35 |
| cjwatson | teward: I probably wasn't going to, since the bugs one didn't cause any major issues that I remember | 12:42 |
| teward | well other than the singular whining about "Why can't you do XYZ" (and they don't understand that'll fail DMARC too) | 12:43 |
| teward | s/whining/concern/ | 12:43 |
| cjwatson | Changing the name part wouldn't fail DMARC | 12:43 |
| teward | glad to see that the code review emails're becoming DMARC compliant though | 12:43 |
| cjwatson | Which is what that commenter was suggesting | 12:44 |
| teward | cjwatson: no, but the 'on behalf of' part is a Microsoft terminology meaning that "Sender" is one thing and "From" is another last I checked | 12:44 |
| cjwatson | Right, wouldn't have to use that specific wording | 12:44 |
| teward | which, breaks DMARC. | 12:44 |
| teward | at the headers level | 12:44 |
| teward | you can have the display name be anything, but it's still its own form of chaos :P | 12:44 |
| teward | still, glad to see things're working towards full compliance :) | 12:44 |
| teward | (now if only the lists were so compliant...) | 12:45 |
| cjwatson | Indeed, and thanks for the contribution there! | 12:45 |
| teward | *yeets self into the abyss* | 12:45 |
| teward | cjwatson: how much of the work did I do but not complete? I saw your note that it was mostly based on my work and you fixed tests | 12:45 |
| cjwatson | If you've been paying close attention you may have noticed that we have some DKIM signing now too | 12:45 |
| teward | cjwatson: semi-close attention, been a little innundated at FT job with someone DoSing an application unintentionally | 12:45 |
| teward | (and breaking things hard) | 12:45 |
| teward | cjwatson: DKIM signing is fun though too xD | 12:46 |
| teward | well on the way to better email integrity (and DMARC!) | 12:46 |
| cjwatson | I tidied up headers a bit from your branch, but otherwise it was mostly fixing tests | 12:46 |
| cjwatson | I thought it best to put the user's display name back in | 12:46 |
| teward | makes sense to me. | 12:46 |
| teward | yeah my branch was unclean :P | 12:47 |
| cjwatson | The way it works now is that any email sent by LP with From: @launchpad.net or @*.launchpad.net should be DKIM-signed | 12:47 |
| cjwatson | (That was due to IS rather than me) | 12:47 |
| cjwatson | So there'll still be cases where we send with non-launchpad.net From:, but bugs and code review accounted for the vast majority of it I think | 12:48 |
| cjwatson | Looks like some kind of librarian outage, investigating | 14:25 |
| cjwatson | ceph backend seems to be down | 14:27 |
| === cjwatson changed the topic of #launchpad to: Firefighting: librarian outage | Help contact: cristiangsp (08:00-17:00 UTC) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| cjwatson | Ceph is back, librarian is working fine again | 15:18 |
| === cjwatson changed the topic of #launchpad to: Help contact: cristiangsp (08:00-17:00 UTC) | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | User Guide https://help.launchpad.net/ | Support and spam reporting: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | ||
| sarnold | cjwatson: excellent py2 -> py3 blogpost :) thanks | 17:08 |
| cjwatson | sarnold: yw :) | 21:30 |
| teward | can I have a link to this said blog post? I don't follow everyone unfortuantely :P | 23:54 |
| sarnold | teward: heya :) https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cjwatson/blog/lp-python3.html | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!